why are the restraints not respected for this SID?
 

Spoiler

---

 

for this reason, it calculates the wrong cruise ALT for me,since as soon as we take a cruise, at the same time we should already be declining...

I am also using the newest AIRAC 2109 database  and PFPX  RAD Restrictions and Directs 2109.

Which PFPX version ?

 

Can you post the complete OFP and what aircraft performance file is in use.

1 minute ago, srcooke said:

Which PFPX version ?

2.03

 

2 minutes ago, srcooke said:

complete OFP and what aircraft performance file

done

aircraft performance.rar CTV046 SKBO-SKRG (23-Sep-2021) #1.txt

Computing here the altitude constraints are respected, crossing ABL at @16000

 

The cruise length is exceedingly short so I guess climb to TOD is likely unless restricted.

 

Using W36 instead of the direct returns cruise FL200.

 

Are there any restrictions on directs in Columbia ?

5 hours ago, srcooke said:

Computing here the altitude constraints are respected, crossing ABL at @16000

it is not obvious to me, I have not seen it anywhere ... besides, constraints is not observed for the first 3 points, not below or above 12000...

 

5 hours ago, srcooke said:

Using W36 instead of the direct

where should i choose?

 

5 hours ago, srcooke said:

Are there any restrictions on directs in Columbia ?

maybe, but I can't see them in my path

PFPX does not generally use the SID level restrictions, it was my mistake in this case.

 

Edit the route: