Jump to content

restraints not respected for SID...


Recommended Posts

why are the restraints not respected for this SID?
 

Spoiler

pfpx2.thumb.png.962a45d8a1d7a69dc9c172018a3734ff.png

---

pfpx.thumb.png.041bb44ac1d86c6092e728c274e4f9d9.png

 

for this reason, it calculates the wrong cruise ALT for me,since as soon as we take a cruise, at the same time we should already be declining...

I am also using the newest AIRAC 2109 database  and PFPX  RAD Restrictions and Directs 2109.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Computing here the altitude constraints are respected, crossing ABL at @16000

 

The cruise length is exceedingly short so I guess climb to TOD is likely unless restricted.

 

Using W36 instead of the direct returns cruise FL200.

 

Are there any restrictions on directs in Columbia ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, srcooke said:

Computing here the altitude constraints are respected, crossing ABL at @16000

it is not obvious to me, I have not seen it anywhere ... besides, constraints is not observed for the first 3 points, not below or above 12000...

 

5 hours ago, srcooke said:

Using W36 instead of the direct

where should i choose?

 

5 hours ago, srcooke said:

Are there any restrictions on directs in Columbia ?

maybe, but I can't see them in my path

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...