Jump to content

radeon29

Members
  • Posts

    152
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About radeon29

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

radeon29's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Week One Done Rare

Recent Badges

12

Reputation

  1. Hey! localizer and glide slope antenna seem superfluous there, right? and also wondering why the folder OPTIONAL_ALTERNATE_FILES is there, nowhere is there a description of the meaning of these files...
  2. does anyone use this scenary in P3Dv5? unfortunately the developer no longer replies after our last conversation (about the wrong version number, which was eventually resolved), I hope he is doing well ... but I have a new problem and so I ask here... I see default buildings in the runway area, can anyone else confirm this in P3Dv5?
  3. I'll just add, that the version in this post: is not up to date... the latest fix version is here:
  4. they fixed it today, downgraded it.
  5. version 1.06 was released quite a long time ago ... there are two or one of two problems: 1) they just forgot to send you a new version... 2) or they just forgot to update the number of the version in the installer... In any case, the version 1.05(or is it possible 1.06) does not work correctly in P5, we get several stock builds and objects.
  6. On the aerosoft website current version: 1.05 also Aerosoft Updater does not see this product... On the flylogicsoftware current version: 1.06 Where is the truth?
  7. no it(the effect of temperature on the barometer) is not implemented in any of the sims...
  8. sorry, probably I asked not quite clear... I just want to clarify: version 2.0.0.0 for P5, this is also the same as 1.0.2.0 for P4, but only P5 support is added?
  9. this is a similar update as 2.0.0.0 for P3D V5?
  10. here you only need an example from a sim( I showed it above and I will be very glad to know that I was wrong) on paper and in real life it would work, but the effect of temperature on altitude is not implemented in sim.
  11. this is not implemented in sim Q.E.D: METAR: Latest Jepp: FAF alt 2470 ft (D5.1 DEM): If this were implemented in the sim, then we would be about 320 ft lower(if the effect of temperature were to be implemented, the correct altitude with corrections should be approx. 2790 ft).
  12. as it is on paper, we roughly know🤔 need a test in sim with screenshots🤗
×
×
  • Create New...