Jump to content
If you cannot find the message you posted we probably moved it to the correct forum section! ×

radeon29

Members
  • Content Count

    145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

2 Followers

About radeon29

  • Rank
    Cheers!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. no it(the effect of temperature on the barometer) is not implemented in any of the sims...
  2. sorry, probably I asked not quite clear... I just want to clarify: version 2.0.0.0 for P5, this is also the same as 1.0.2.0 for P4, but only P5 support is added?
  3. this is a similar update as 2.0.0.0 for P3D V5?
  4. here you only need an example from a sim( I showed it above and I will be very glad to know that I was wrong) on paper and in real life it would work, but the effect of temperature on altitude is not implemented in sim.
  5. this is not implemented in sim Q.E.D: METAR: Latest Jepp: FAF alt 2470 ft (D5.1 DEM): If this were implemented in the sim, then we would be about 320 ft lower(if the effect of temperature were to be implemented, the correct altitude with corrections should be approx. 2790 ft).
  6. as it is on paper, we roughly know🤔 need a test in sim with screenshots🤗
  7. I think we are talking about different things ... pressure is not compensated, we just make a altitude correction by adding extra, moreover, in the case of the airbus, we shouldn't to altitude correctionin any of the cases when we use VNAV minimums and you no fall outside of the temperature restrictions: (in this case - 16 or +54).? This was also discussed here, in none of the simulators this is implemented: (even if it is - 60 or +60 in the sim, the altitude will not depend on the temperature)
  8. no, so this(the effect of cold or hot weather on the altimeter) is not realized in sim, or am I wrong? understood, thanks, I hope he clears up my last question;)
  9. it turned out to be an interesting discussion, but still wanted to summarize for the airbus, what do we do in 1 case: and what do we do in 2 case: ?
  10. I think I got ahead of the developers and found the cause of the problem, now I hope the developer will not be silent and fix it: 1)after uninstalling MSFS this problem appear... 2)after installation MSFS this problem disappears... i.e. the problem occurs when trying to read MSFS (XBOX ver) paths after MSFS uninstall ... p/s I also have H4 and P5 installed.
  11. all this is very interesting, but as far as I know, we will not be able to test this in sim because it is not implemented😔 but nevertheless it's interesting: REQUIREMENTS FOR COLD TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION Following Commission Regulation (EU) 965/2012, EASA states in documents AMC2 CAT.OP.MPA.126 and AMC2 NCC/NCO/SPO.OP.116, section (d) item (1): For RNP APCH operations to LNAV/VNAV minima using Baro VNAV: the flight crew should not commence the approach when the aerodrome temperature is outside the promulgated aerodrome temperature limits f
  12. unfortunately not found, if you have a link please send via PM. P.S i doubt you read this document every time in cold weather;) if you can summarize the main points it would be great!
  13. as we all know , we need to apply cold temperature correction to our airbus and there are many different discussions on this topic🤔: -someone is sure that it is necessary to correct only DA/MDA -someone suggests correcting from FAF -someone suggests all points below MSA -someone claims that there is no need for an adjustment if the temperature is not lower than the minimum permissible specified in the charts we have real pilots here, how is it right?)))
×
×
  • Create New...