Jump to content

Something goes wrong with V2


Recommended Posts

good day

 

It s seem some route arent available

 

if someone can try to find a valid route LFPG-EHAM with upper airspace

for me un873/874 doesn't exist but why because i can see when i toggle upper airway on the map... 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try this route: NURM2B NURMO UN874 VEKIN UN873 FERDI UY18 DENUT DENU1A File for FL300 as maximum altitude or it will be rejected. In general it is sometimes all about the correct routing, or altitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is currently an issue with altitude restrictions, they may be tagged disabled but actually remain active.

 

For the summer months YX4005 is active restricting the city pair LFPG-EHAM to FL245

 

You could delete this entry in the route restrictions\FL editor as an interim measure.

 

LF4085 remains in force capping the level to 305 and a valid route is achieved on first pass.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok but in my case, these two airways UN873 and UN874 aren't recognize as an existing airways, before having a valid cfmu route, i would like to be allow to build a route with one of these two airways, actually pfpx can't build a route with 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If YX4005 is active, erroneously as noted in this case, then further restrictions prevent the use of UN874 for example.

 

Delete the YX4005 entry restart PFPX.

 

You should be able to use the advanced route editor and 'ignore restrictions', yet again the alt cap remains active at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use