Aerosoft official retail partner for Microsoft Flight Simulator !! 
Click here for more information

Jump to content

Caribbean_Redz

Members
  • Content Count

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

17 Good

1 Follower

About Caribbean_Redz

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork

Recent Profile Visitors

543 profile views
  1. Greetings all. I was flying the smaller buses a week or so ago and just as I was about to push the throttles for departure I got a CTD. When I looked in the event viewer it returned the "D3D10Warp.dll" as the error. I restarted the PC redid the flight and it was fine. Today, Aug 3, I did a flight in the A333, and halfway through the flight, I got the same error. Please see the log below from the event viewer. Faulting application name: Prepar3D.exe, version: 4.5.14.34698, time stamp: 0x5e94b5c2 Faulting module name: D3D10Warp.dll, version: 10.0.18362.356, time stamp: 0x3ff1131a Exception code: 0xc0000005 Fault offset: 0x00000000000abe00 Faulting process id: 0x728 Faulting application start time: 0x01d669ebeeb77a1f Faulting application path: D:\Program Files\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v4\Prepar3D.exe Faulting module path: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\D3D10Warp.dll Report Id: f272aec7-3f71-44cd-afcc-d9879c8576db Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID: Application: Prepar3D.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: exception code c0000005, exception address 00007FFD7F9EBE00
  2. Thanks for sharing this Mathijs. I have now had this same CTD now three times. And for nothing, I cannot even update the file should it be corrupt. I have even tried installing over the DirectX12 and it says that the latest files are already installed. Hopefully there is a fix soon because I would like to fly my 330 unhindered. Regards,
  3. Ok, thank you for the response... The challenge is though, and I can stand aside where Dave can correct me, this was to be address in this new build. So when I saw it not fixed this why I posted it here. Regards,
  4. Greetings Team. I would like to offer thanks! for the work you have put in to get this new update out. I have updated the airbuses following the guide, that was given in a subsequent post, to the letter. Even after the new builds, I am still getting the fuel planner issue where my trim setting does not offer an "up" position for the baby buses (see photos) No matter the combination, out of range and within range gives me a down trim. Only on the A333 I can get the trim to be in the up position. Please, if you will, let me know what other steps I may take to resolve this issue. Regards,
  5. aiight so I would have done the reinstall of all the buses. However, the fuel planner is still giving me an issue that I am not "ok" with. Regardless of what payload I have in the fuel planner for the A318-321, it gives me a trim setting of "down"... only in the A333 it shows a trim setting of up. Is that something you are aware of? Regards,
  6. I was very pleased with the flight that I did as well and mine was a 7hr flight... My issue is not the A330 itself.. it's the fuel planner (will message in that thread 🙂 ) thanks for your hardwork guys... it is really appreciate it!!! Regards,
  7. I am up to date with all three installers... 1.0.0.6 But thank you for assuring that you all are working on the fuel planner because it just didn't make sense that all my flights in the baby bus have a trim down...
  8. Ok, I just did a reinstall, but with the A333 first... and I am still seeing the same issue. I will attempt to do it the other way around and report back.
  9. Greetings, Just wanted to know if this issues is being looked at. Also, I just wish to ask if after the removal of the older versions (of the baby bus) were we to remove the A333 before we reinstalled the small buses? Does it require a sequence?
  10. I have noticed that with the update, the baby buses fuel planner is giving me a very low cargo limit before hitting red on the landing weight and in some cases - red even when there is no cargo (see images below). In addition the trim setting does not allow for up values, only down. Is this a known issue?
  11. Ah ok. Thanks Dave Thank you guys very much for that response. I have seen since the updates that the taxiing speed doesn't really go pass 13/14kts. Regards,
  12. Hey team.. As always, I start off affirming you of the work you continue to do to make this plane even greater. Just one concern that was raised. Considering that the baby buses require input (where N1 is at 0) for taxi; is it possible for the same to occur with the A333? even if the N1 is greater than 0, can it be less than the 23% that's currently there? I have seen videos of A333 and you hear the engine spool before the aircraft moves. Moreover, if she is heavy for a long trip, I feel that the inertia will require some "thrust/push" to get the bird going. I am no expert so please, I can take correction 🙂 thanks in advance. Regards,
×
×
  • Create New...