Recently we have seen a lot of codes used to unlock our products being offered for discounted prices. Almost all of them are bought using stolen credit cards. These codes will all be blocked by our systems and you will have to try to get your money back from the seller, we are unable to assist in these matters. Do be very careful when you see a deal that is almost too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.

Jump to content

Jan Broe

members
  • Content Count

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jan Broe

  1. Back in January, Mathijs wrote that they were expecting files from the developer. Since then there's not been a single word about the progress. I simply refuse to believe that after 11 months of silence, there should be nothing to report. But even if the project had indeed been mothballed for all of 2018, by all means say so! In many other threads on the Preview forum, reporting problems and delays are not a problem. For the record I was not the one downvoting your response, but to counter the downvote you received, I have just upvoted it.
  2. No official progress reports since April when @Mathijs Kok would "try to get some updates". Seeing how this product is still labelled Singapore X rather than Singapore Professional, I have a faint hope that there will be an FSX version coming out, but it seems less and less likely for every day that passes, and I don't really like how questions to Aerosoft in this thread seemingly fall on deaf ears - as a long-time reader of Aerosoft's forum I know this usually spells trouble. I appreciate that as customers we're not in a position to "demand" information, but I think the posts in this thread indicate that there *is* an interest in this product, even if the competition has launched a competing product for P3D, so asking as politely as possible, could we possibly get an up-to-date report on the status of this project? TIA :-)
  3. This seems to be one of the few airports in development where the title hasn't yet changed from "Mega Airport" to "Professional". Does that mean that a version for FSX is still planned? And seeing how all the way back in January you were awaiting the files from the developer, is there any progress to report?
  4. Thanks for your reply, Herman. I read the Preview threads on an almost daily basis, so I'm very familiar with Jo's Cologne-project. But I'm still surprised that with all the Norwegian airports published by Aerosoft over the years, Kristiansand has been ignored. Of the Norwegian airports not made yet, I believe that KRS is by far the biggest/busiest and also much bigger than some of the ones that have in fact been published (although I know that size in itself is not a deciding factor for Aerosoft). So basically I was just wondering if there were "external reasons" preventing this, like fx. the Johannesburg project where the airport authoritites would not allow access for a photoshoot. If there were simliar challenges at KRS, it would be pointless for me to sit around and patiently wait/hope for it to happen sooner or later...
  5. Jo Erlend seems to have stopped working his way thru Norway's airports big and small. A shame, really, as KRS/ENCN Kristiansand is still missing. Is there any reason (that you can reveal here) for not making this part of Aerosoft's Norway portfolio? In terms of private sales, I'm sure it would sell just as good as Bergen, Trondheim, Tromsø etc...
  6. Okay, here we go... My Cessna is a little outside the airport boundary this time, but well within the scenery package. But where?
  7. @A320neo777 you guessed the previous pic, so now it's your turn to post a pic for us to guess. If you're not interested in posting a pic, please let us know, so someone else can post one, and get this quiz running again. Thanks :-)
  8. Okay, I'll try to reinvigorate this thread. Where am I (about to land)?
  9. When the FlyTampa Copenhagen scenery was released, the first set of AES data was not correct either. But an employee at the airport with access to the correct information got in touch with Oliver Parbst, and it was all rectified in the following release. I am sure that if you can get your hands on the correct information, Oliver would do the same for Brussels. Towing - at least as part of a "push back and pull forward" procedure is already available in AES. Again it's just a matter of informing Oliver Parbst if you find that it is missing at some gates.
  10. It's okay - let's use Kim's picture! But any chance you could re-do the picture with a bit more brightness, Kim? It looks extremely dark here, so it's hard to see the details in the background...
  11. Indeed Hamburg - Finkenwerder Airport in upper right corner and Volkspark Stadium (or Imtech Arena or whatever it's called this week) midway down on the right...
  12. Man, that was quick... I knew I should have picked a harder one Scotth6, your turn!
  13. Thanks, Rihards. My trusty Cessna has moved to another major airport. But which one?
  14. Well, I deliberately tried to make it a little harder by placing a small (by EKCH standards) aircraft in one of the maintenance areas away from the terminals. I thought it would be a bit more fun this way than just placing a SAS A320 at one of the terminal stands... Will be interesting to see what Rihards has in store for us now!
  15. Correct The banner advertises Norwegian, who are using the hangar as a technical base. It was originally built for Maersk Air - hence the colour of the building. Maersk merged with Sterling but the combined airline went bankrupt. The building on the left is (the bottom of) the control tower, where I've worked for 26 years... The scenery is FlyTampa's EKCH. Your turn, Rihards!
  16. The banner on the building advertises a certain airline (and is 100% realistic in terms of colours and font used by the real-life airline), and as such indicates that this is a destination served by that airline... The building that the banner is on, is today used as a technical base for this airline. But the building was originally purpose-built by another airline as their headquarters and served as such, even after that airline merged with another to become a low-cost outfit. However, the combined outfit, which by then no longer used light blue as their 'trademark' colour, went bankrupt a few years later... The gray building on the left is taller than any building in Greenland... Confused?
  17. Finals for rwy 26 at EPRZ Rzeszow Jasionka (or is the GA part called EPRJ? I'm not quite sure!)
  18. Apart from Emi's tongue-in-cheek remark about his home airport, there has been no word from Aerosoft staff about this airport since the project was announced on 2 May. I appreciate that Simwings are busy people, but surely after almost 6 months there must be something new to report? Sorry, no annoying Tapatalk signature here!
  19. A trio of Scandinavian airports I'd like to see developed for FSX in Aerosoft quality: EKYT - Aalborg ENCN - Kristiansand ESMS - Malmö Sturup I've been waiting (patiently) for Jo Erlend to start working on Kristiansand, as I believe that's the largest/busiest Norwegian airport that has not yet been made by Aerosoft, but not much has happened yet. And before Patrick jumps at it, yes, I am aware that both Aalborg and Malmö have been developed by enthusiastic people, but compared to commercial sceneries, they leave a lot to be desired... Sorry, no pointless Tapatalk signature here...
  20. Finally we'll be able to replace the old and outdated Simgiants scenery with an updated version of much higher quality
×
×
  • Create New...