Cyberstudio
-
Posts
88 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Cyberstudio
-
-
Or a Dassault Falcon!?
-
Hi Mathijs!
Can i ask you, what is the official aerosoft position regarding classic jetliners (For example... 747-200 or a DC8)? and what about something like a learjet? What's the position about that?
-
Rubbish. You understand nothing about development and marketing. If you want a better 727 then moan like frack to the idjits that you paid for a good 727, and didn't get it. I'm still waiting for them to fix the 707...
Yeah... you may be right. i dont understand anything about marketing. but, as a software developer who make his life writing code 6 days a week, i think i may have a clue about development
-
Ahh... so bad.. I have that 727 and is full of bugs. the other two are lacking in systems
that's why i think they should be made with the Aerosoft Quality
-
Aerosoft has AirbusX and the CRJ is on the way. BTW: DC10-Done, A310-done, 737-done, 727-done, cessna citation-done, tristar-done, 747 "classics"-done.
As I can't mention the developers, but hey there is Google.com.
!? What? Dc10? a310? 747? what? done? by who?
If you're talking about that old 737.. the vc isn't good at all, and the auto pilot has issues turning. Also, is a few years old by now. i know about the citation you may be thinking about, but im thinking of a bigger one. The 727, well.. is a mess of bugs (At least the one from a famous developer)
anyway... please send me a message with the dc10, 747 and a310 developer names please!!
-
Hi guys!
I love the quality of Aerosoft addons, and i always wonder... why only small aircraft projects? like two seat planes, and stuff like that? Please, try with a classic! A classic jetliner or a classic turbo prop. (+10 seats http://forum.aerosoft.com/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
If you don't want to make a classic (that's too bad!), try something different. Like a business jet.
Some projects that i will die for:
747 Classics (200, 100, SP, etc)DC-8DC-7TristarA cessna citation727! (I know there's one from other developer. i own it, but can't fly with it because its full of bugs!)737 (300, 400, 500)A310DC10
Can you imagine being at Aerosoft Anchorage, with your 747-200, at 3AM, full of cargo, makng your pre-flight for leaving to KJFK!? My god... Wet dream!!
What do you say guys? There's an entire market for those. We (the classics lovers) are always ignored. http://forum.aerosoft.com/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif
Sorry for my bad english! -
"what needs to be done until it is going to be released?"
Mostly MCDU systems, our simplified VNAV (we are not 100% sure on what this will include so don't ask) and a few other bits of coding. Sound, flight models, modeling, texturing etc is all done.
Hi
Just to confirm this part... What you're saying is that maybe VNAV will not be included? so maybe we will only have LNAV?
In that case, we will be descending using the V/S, like on a 747-200?
-
Hi!, just a note: the DHL Yellow nose and the PIA nose aren't well aligned. Maybe that should be fixed in a future service pack or something
Aerosoft CRJ Developers...Please answer this question on LNAV Tracking issue (over-correcting, swaying back and forth)
in Manual Flight, Autoflight and Flight Management
Posted
My opinion is that the CRJ has been abandoned and its just on life support. They will only fix issues that prevent the plane from being used but that's it. Don't expect mayor improvements to the product or extensive bug fixes. I think they already moved on. I see the same signs already with the twin otter.