Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cyberstudio

  1. I changed manually the file and changed the R237L for R237R And yet the plane still turns left. Is that the only change that i should make?


    5 hours ago, metzgergva said:

    The drawing of the route is correct. After take-off intercept radial 166 and at 10 nm from PJM turn right onto a DME ARC 12 nm and then at radial 237 intercepet radial to Juice with HDG 325.


    I was under the impression that the drawing was wrong because there's no visible connection between the arc and the flight plan path as i always see on the pmdg/fsl planes but i may be wrong on that

  2. Hi Hans!


    First of all let me congratulate you. This plane is awesome!. The modeling is just amazing as well as the lightning and the systems!


    This morning during a flight i found an issue. If you position the plane at TNCM and try to add this SID: " JULNA2 transicion JUICE" you will notice something odd: The route isn' t drawn correctly in the ND. furthermore, if you try to fly it the plane will initially fly it ok until it reaches the beginning of the arc: It will turn left instead of right and stop following the flightplan and will start flying in circles. Please look at the image attached.


    The issue is fairly easy to reproduce. Just put the plane at TNCM and add the sid JULNA2.


  3. Rubbish. You understand nothing about development and marketing. If you want a better 727 then moan like frack to the idjits that you paid for a good 727, and didn't get it. I'm still waiting for them to fix the 707...

    Yeah... you may be right. i dont understand anything about marketing. but, as a software developer who make his life writing code 6 days a week, i think i may have a clue about development smile.gif

  4. Aerosoft has AirbusX and the CRJ is on the way. BTW: DC10-Done, A310-done, 737-done, 727-done, cessna citation-done, tristar-done, 747 "classics"-done.

    As I can't mention the developers, but hey there is Google.com.smile.gif

    !? What? Dc10? a310? 747? what? done? by who? blink.gif

    If you're talking about that old 737.. the vc isn't good at all, and the auto pilot has issues turning. Also, is a few years old by now. i know about the citation you may be thinking about, but im thinking of a bigger one. The 727, well.. is a mess of bugs (At least the one from a famous developer)

    anyway... please send me a message with the dc10, 747 and a310 developer names please!!

  5. Hi guys!

    I love the quality of Aerosoft addons, and i always wonder... why only small aircraft projects? like two seat planes, and stuff like that? Please, try with a classic! A classic jetliner or a classic turbo prop. (+10 seats http://forum.aerosoft.com/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

    If you don't want to make a classic (that's too bad!), try something different. Like a business jet.

    Some projects that i will die for:

    747 Classics (200, 100, SP, etc)DC-8DC-7TristarA cessna citation727! (I know there's one from other developer. i own it, but can't fly with it because its full of bugs!)737 (300, 400, 500)A310DC10
    Can you imagine being at Aerosoft Anchorage, with your 747-200, at 3AM, full of cargo, makng your pre-flight for leaving to KJFK!? My god... Wet dream!!
    What do you say guys? There's an entire market for those. We (the classics lovers) are always ignored. http://forum.aerosoft.com/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif

    Sorry for my bad english!
  6. "what needs to be done until it is going to be released?"

    Mostly MCDU systems, our simplified VNAV (we are not 100% sure on what this will include so don't ask) and a few other bits of coding. Sound, flight models, modeling, texturing etc is all done.


    Just to confirm this part... What you're saying is that maybe VNAV will not be included? so maybe we will only have LNAV? :blink:

    In that case, we will be descending using the V/S, like on a 747-200? :o

  • Create New...