Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jackjones

  1. Dear PFPX Team, I kindly want to ask, if there are any major updates planned for the near future of this beautiful piece of software? There have been several requests, especially when it come to the Flightbrief outputs, in the past and of course any other things too Just a bit qurious Regards
  2. Well it´s the Forum for the MSFS 2020, so I´m talking about it And I do have the latest version of EDDK, according to the Aerosoft updater:
  3. Dear Team, I just found a bump in the surface, while taxiing to RW24, via A3. When crossing rw 14L/32R into the taxiway D for rw 24, there´s a bump, which makes the plane jumping around. Taxiway B coming from V apron is also a bit bumpy tbh. Not sure if there are plans for a future update, but if so, it would be nice to take this into account Thanks a lot and best regards
  4. Was working for me too a couple of hours ago....
  5. My request is solved! I can´t edit it, so please delete it. Here the source for the CJ4 performance file. https://flightsim.to/file/5645/cessna-citation-cj4-pfpx-aircraft-performance-file At the moment there is a little error in file about the DOM and MFZW in the section [LB]. I informed the creator already to change it, otherwise PFPX will create an error message that the MFZW is lower then the DOM. The correct value in LB for the MFZW is 12359 lbs, just in case you want to change it yourself Cheers
  6. Thanks for the fast reply and this sounds good to me and I guess all the others as well Cheers and Happy new year to all following here.
  7. Hello, first of all I would like to tell you, that I was very happy to see my "home airport" as one of the first beeing released for MSFS, thanks for that. Due to the new technique, SDK and options all develeoper have now, I´m wondering a bit about these floating light balls everywhere. Well this of couse not only releated to this szenery, as it is possible to spot them everywhere in the world of MSFS. I guess these are a kind of light source, which illuminates their surrounding, what is a really a cool thing, but why are they set so random and why is it not possible to put them into lightpoles ? It´s not only that they are floating around, they also appear out of nothing. Here a two sample picuture for a better understanding: First is during daytime and the next when the light appears a bit more zoomed in ( I mean the one between the left light pole and the hanger, just overhead the aircraft). It´s quite clear to see that there´s no lightpole and suddenly there´s this light, floating. Funny is also that somehtimes there are lightpoles, but this lightsource ball is only next to it, so the pole is getting useless Is there a chance to get this fixed in future updates? Cheers
  8. Did a fligth and planning 4 hours ago, no issues...even now, all is working for me
  9. Update V. 2.04 available. I´m not sure if this is the answer most of us are waiting for, but least there is something happening Still waiting for the offical statement about the actual situation to Aerosoft
  10. In the download section for PFPX you´ll find an Excel sheet, it´ll to bring the actual "preffered routes" within the US to the needed format to import them into PFPX. The webadress and how to use it is also mentioned in this document. This will bring you a couple of thousend routes..... As well there is file for Russian routes for non Russian airlines, you can import as well. Most of these routes are outdated, but still about 7000 routes are valid and working with AIRAC 2012. Cheers
  11. Thank you Phil I checked the profile, I already have and all values are according to the books and even more detailed as there are additional values which got inerpolated (which I also x-checked). When I posted my issue here, is was still running on V1.28, because PFPX didn´t showed any update options, but now I´m running the latest V2.03 and so far so good....this error didn´t showed up anymore. I will monitor it and post here, if this error will show up again.
  12. Well, yes.... The FlightPlanTemplate has some more options you can choose from, but is limited to the number of entries. For some field you can just, double, or tripple enter values, which will get filled out by the system by choosing the actual best fitting value into it (like Callsign, Airline, Tailnumber). Temperature is just one fix value e.g. OAT, if you know enter the ISA in the same way behind, or infront the OAT <ISADev>, it will show you both values during cruise, but only should display the actual ISADev during climb out/ descent phase. There is also the option to enter <&TOCTemp> / <&TO_Temperature> / <&LDG_Temperature>, but I assume that these values for TO and LDG only will show you the actual temps at the airport. This is kind of trial and error For me personally (in my own created OFP) works ISADev[0] -> shows actual +/- instead of P/M the best, because I want to know the actual differenz in ISA for performance reasons.
  13. You need to change an entry within the "flight plan template" Check: User/Public/PublicDocuments/PFPX data/FlightPlanTemplates Open the one your are using e.g. PFPX, or EDS with the Editor Find the entry for "ISADev" ->" <&ISADev[1]:3> " within the document and change it to <&OAT[0]:3> Safe the file! You can see the effect direct after saving it! You just need to switch in PFPX to the other OFP format and back to the one you just had changed Cheers
  14. I can´t edit my prior post, that´s why here an update: I have to following sub-routes: BIKF-CYFB ---------- SORIRYFB01;SORIR SORIR SOSIT UT594 NUTKA CLAVY N898A MUSVA BILKU YFB YFB SORIRYFB02;SORIR SORIR GOKIK SOSIT UT593 DA TOLAN AVPUT N906A NALDI DUTUM YFB YFB SORIRYFB03;SORIR SORIR SOPEN 6530N 6540N 6650N AVPUT N906A NALDI YFB YFB CYFB-BIKF ---------- DUTUMGOKIK01;DUTUM DUTUM AVPUT TOLAN MASIK GOKIK GOKIK DUTUMGOKIK02;DUTUM DUTUM CLAVY 6550N 6540N 6530N GOKIK GOKIK It seems that the first three from BIKF - CYFB are "accepted by the Route Database, so if I now hit the "find..." button, it shows me a route , GREAT !!! This doesn´t work the other way..... CYFB-BIKF still requires the "advanced route finder". All routes are imported and checked for compliance with AIRAC2012 (green hook) Why does PFPX still can´t find me a way back from CYFB to BIKF?
  15. Thanks again Stephen, I tried it, but it still does not work, like you discribe...I did the following: Routing: BIKF -> CYFB 1. I created my own route, which I saved so that I could selcet it via the drop down menu (Route field -> Ident) -> From here I can select: BIKFCYFB01 (my saved routing), Edit, Find, Load 2. I created two additional routings in the "sub-routes.txt" file (according to the sample, out of "RAD Restrictions and Directs 2012 1.0.0", in the same format and imported these into my Route Database. Here are now some route options for PFPX, but when I hit "Find..." there is still the message opening: "Route Finder was not able to find a valid Route, Open Advanced Route Finder"
  16. Thanks Stehpen for this fast reply! In that case I´m aksing myself, if there´s an option implemented in PFPX for these special routes (maybe I just didn´t found it, yet), just because I couldn´t create them by the system "Auto". Sorry for this question, but I´m not a dispatcher
  17. Hi gyus, I´m wondering if there´s a possibility to upload and share the routes I´ve created to the PFPX Server, so that other users are able to "AUTO" route them, or just load them. These routes I´m talking about are mainly in the NAT HLA airspace (special routes / Blue Spruce Routes), between Europe and North America and vice versa. Unfortunately in this aera there are only few, or none known routes avialable at the moment. Just as information: These routes are used mainly for smaler aircrafts, which need to operate within this area e.g. Buisness jets, Medevac flights, or just ferry fligths.
  18. I found that I was still working with V1.28 (there was no update available showing to me)...anyway, now I´m running on V2.03 and it´s great! Just still the issue with me OFP So, if here are some dev. reading in the Forum, I would be happy to get some more print options within the next update. My Nav Log is horizontal, so I wish I could print it like that too....for the moment I´m doing it like JP (see above) and copy & paste it into a Word file to have it the in format I´m used to. Just an Idea, don´t know if this is possible !? At the moment the flight plan template is just printing out, what is shown after computing the flight. If there were be an option to divide it into seperate pages e.g. Cover->(Briefing package) page 1, then the followed by page 2 until xx (end of Nav Log), page xx to xx performance, page xx to xx, etc.... and to add an additional "printing orientation" which is editable in the flightplan template, it would be editable the user. Like I said...just some thoughts I do have
  19. Thank you srcooke, I uninstalled PFPX and deleted all folders, after that the new version 2.03 was available to me! Cheers
  20. What´s the latest verion of PXPX at the moment? I´m still running on 1.28 (Win 10) On the webpage I found someting like 2.03 ? After installation it´s still showing 1.28
  21. I think so yes! The original creator of the performance file, put in random values from a Learjet 35, but not the ones from FlightSimware! Due to that I changed my file to the correct values (weights) to match the values from FSW, as well I´ve added the values for LRC out of the books. I´m wondering how you did your LRC calculations in PFPX with the Lear 35 as there´s no profile to do it
  • Create New...