jackjones

Yes, that was it....expired subscription! Thanks

Hmmmmmm, yes it always crashes direct after starting the app. System rebooted and still direct after start up, when it´s trying to load actual WX and tracks. When I disconnect the internect connection, there´s no CTD until I reconnect the internet. That´s what I could investigate so far.

A few days ago, PFPX was working fine. Since today I do have constant CTDs. Does anyone having the same? Name der fehlerhaften Anwendung: PFPX.exe, Version: 2.0.4.0, Zeitstempel: 0x5fdb05ce Name des fehlerhaften Moduls: ntdll.dll, Version: 10.0.19041.1288, Zeitstempel: 0x027db076 Ausnahmecode: 0xc0000005 Fehleroffset: 0x0005f583 ID des fehlerhaften Prozesses: 0x2720 Startzeit der fehlerhaften Anwendung: 0x01d7d9f7e1353e63 Pfad der fehlerhaften Anwendung: C:\Program Files (x86)\Professional Flight Planner X\PFPX.exe Pfad des fehlerhaften Moduls: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll Berichtskennung: 428493c7-f1fc-4c39-8f6b-054b29286082 Vollständiger Name des fehlerhaften Pakets: Anwendungs-ID, die relativ zum fehlerhaften Paket ist: Cheers

Dear PFPX Team, I kindly want to ask, if there are any major updates planned for the near future of this beautiful piece of software? There have been several requests, especially when it come to the Flightbrief outputs, in the past and of course any other things too Just a bit qurious Regards

No sweat Alles gut VG

Well it´s the Forum for the MSFS 2020, so I´m talking about it And I do have the latest version of EDDK, according to the Aerosoft updater: 1.0.4.0

Dear Team, I just found a bump in the surface, while taxiing to RW24, via A3. When crossing rw 14L/32R into the taxiway D for rw 24, there´s a bump, which makes the plane jumping around. Taxiway B coming from V apron is also a bit bumpy tbh. Not sure if there are plans for a future update, but if so, it would be nice to take this into account Thanks a lot and best regards

Was working for me too a couple of hours ago....

My request is solved! I can´t edit it, so please delete it. Here the source for the CJ4 performance file. https://flightsim.to/file/5645/cessna-citation-cj4-pfpx-aircraft-performance-file At the moment there is a little error in file about the DOM and MFZW in the section [LB]. I informed the creator already to change it, otherwise PFPX will create an error message that the MFZW is lower then the DOM. The correct value in LB for the MFZW is 12359 lbs, just in case you want to change it yourself Cheers

Thanks for the fast reply and this sounds good to me and I guess all the others as well Cheers and Happy new year to all following here.

Hello, first of all I would like to tell you, that I was very happy to see my "home airport" as one of the first beeing released for MSFS, thanks for that. Due to the new technique, SDK and options all develeoper have now, I´m wondering a bit about these floating light balls everywhere. Well this of couse not only releated to this szenery, as it is possible to spot them everywhere in the world of MSFS. I guess these are a kind of light source, which illuminates their surrounding, what is a really a cool thing, but why are they set so random and why is it not possible to put them into lightpoles ? It´s not only that they are floating around, they also appear out of nothing. Here a two sample picuture for a better understanding: First is during daytime and the next when the light appears a bit more zoomed in ( I mean the one between the left light pole and the hanger, just overhead the aircraft). It´s quite clear to see that there´s no lightpole and suddenly there´s this light, floating. Funny is also that somehtimes there are lightpoles, but this lightsource ball is only next to it, so the pole is getting useless Is there a chance to get this fixed in future updates? Cheers

Did a fligth and planning 4 hours ago, no issues...even now, all is working for me

REQUEST Request CJ4 aircraft template for the new MSFS Cheers

Update V. 2.04 available. I´m not sure if this is the answer most of us are waiting for, but least there is something happening Still waiting for the offical statement about the actual situation to Aerosoft

Sorry...forgot to qoute him.....see my post above