Jump to content

uadriver

Members
  • Content Count

    175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About uadriver

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Solo

Recent Profile Visitors

1886 profile views
  1. Unfortunately, my exuberance has waned a tad... with both V2.03 & 4. After my previous, I moved on to customise my recent install a little more ...... but found some interesting "disconnects / glitches" which collectively & separately it seems give one a differing OFP's for the same aircraft / route / weather, particularly in respect of the "negative distance" issue, but also as discussed in this topic. In no order, I notice: The Configurator/Planning does not save changes to SID/STARS nor Runway Selection. If one imports an enroute plan, it overri
  2. Stephen Hope you enjoy your morning coffee as I am now ........... I believe I've found some of the glitch herein (though odd's at VEPAM as yours) but also the glitch with "negative" ADEQUATES (cancelling my support enquiry next) My routes to date had been imported from V1.28 ....... but have built "newbies" with apparent success for V2.03. CPA741 VHHH-WSSS (23-Apr-2021) #1.txt
  3. Stephen The attached (V2.03) OFP (my custom one) shows an ATS profile on L642 different to what I expected. After the initial climb to F360(SA), I was expecting metric 11000(FA) thru Sanya, then F360(PJ) most of the way to WSS. Max possible would not have achieved F390(PJ) but certainly F360. Your thoughts. CPA741 VHHH-WSSS (19-Apr-2021) #1.txt
  4. Stephen Contrary to earlier thinking, filed the attached yesterday to see a lemon or 2.... v2.04. The other point of note, the map is not showing start (GLORY) & end (ELATO) fixes of the en-route plan portion ...... never noticed that before. As before, your questions / thoughts if appropriate. I'll try v2.03 to compare. Cheers, John CPA2037 RJBB-VHHH (10-Apr-2021) #1.txt current_wx_snapshot.txt
  5. Stephen This is a tad weird. I checked other routes each way along with the return of the subject route & no quirkies (v2.04) This morning, having trashed my earlier plans of ZBAA-VHHH, I rebuilt that with the same 20201007 weather & guess what, no quirkies. So still using v2.04 but will report if I see the issue again. Attached are some "pics etc." of the is morning's effort ..... in case it helps somehow. You will notice in comparison with yours that VMMC is not listed as an adequate. Cheers John CPA349
  6. Stephen Firstly, the anomalies I refer to are at the VHHH Adequate in both the attached & also at ZGHA in CPA3942. The AS weather / departure times are 2020100402Z CPA3942 & 0702Z CPA349. Using PFPX OFP shows similar negative distances to the next fix plus other fuel & time quirks ..... as it does in my CPA Regional Template (inherited from V1.28) Cheers, John CPA349 ZBAA-VHHH (05-Apr-2021) #2.txt CPA3492 ZBAA-VHHH (05-Apr-2021) #1.txt
  7. Stephen Back on topic, well almost. With V2.04, I get OFP's with Adequates nominated (& markers shown on the planning map). But most instances include quirky data such as incorrect segment distances between route fixes (some negative) and time intervals/fuel not matching the distance suggested as to be flown. It is a a tad difficult to detail further though it does seem distance to the adequate itself is being substituted for the route distance to the marker. The attached show examples of this. Your thoughts / questions. John
  8. thanks stephen .......... another level of detail pfpx has that i had "chased" eAIP's for without joy.
  9. stephen thanks & apologies for a tardy reply (notifications not set correctly) yes, the attached OFP's (light, medium, heavy ZFW's for a 77F) show how the FLAS's work ..... & extend through vietnam & chinese airspace but not into hongkong. is there a way one can see such data in PFPX ...... i could not find it in a search of the respective FIR's eAIP's. the approved atc's make interesting need for level changes in sim atc addons. cheers john CPA2042 WSSS-VHHH (22 Oct 2020) #1.txt CPA2042 WSSS-VHHH (22 Oct 2020) #2
  10. stephen thanks for your note ........ now i'm thinking it may be a glitch in one of the aircraft files. will report more if apprpriate john
  11. I get some curious OFP (ATC) results on the above. The approved is at even FL's, not odd for flights in that north east direction. It is as best I know it a 1 way in that direction, but behaves in the opposite (?) "VMR M771 DULOP" is the route used to VHHH. If I use "VMR DCT DULOP" odd levels are filed. Is this an airac problem or ....... it is unique amongst many others (could it be because the WSSS track to VMR is west of north.. Comments welcomed.
  12. francescom i am surprised you have not heard from others ... given i thought there was many like you & i that have the " issue". have you updated to vers 1.1 of the a320/1 yet ... i was wondering if inadvertently / accidently there was a solution therein / it has disappeared ! i will be updating soon, just haven't had the time !! having simmed other complex aircraft on the same pc / same add-ons including the axe, i find it hard to believe it's not a "stress glitch" in the a320/1 somehow (as you have possibly identified). cheers john
  13. francescom an interesting & encouraging find ! i don't have the 318/9 & i have only flown the 320IAE so can't add any further to your efforts .... so hope another can "duplicate" your results for either model ! i do note however that others reported the "problem" on the 319 prior to the 320's release, but then that may have been before the various "fixes etc" to the 319 after its release. john
×
×
  • Create New...