Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted April 14, 2008 Aerosoft Share Posted April 14, 2008 Screenshot artist, who do pretty solid reviews, reviewed the Twin Otter. And of course, they liked it. "The night before I wrote this conclusion, I downloaded and installed a little tool which extracts and breaks down a lot of information from the FSX flight log, giving you, amongst other things, a total time per model breakdown of your hours. I was slightly surprised to find that I had flown two particular turboprops a lot more than anything else and that the Aerosoft Twotter, which I have had for a considerably shorter time than the other one, was top of the list."Check out the review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorisVdB 0 Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Now well Mathijs, I guess you'll be happy to hear that I (one of the reviewers of www.flightsimx.be - probably the largest Belgian FS website) have the honor of reviewing the two deHavilland's from you guys. At the moment I haven't got much time left (school ) but I'll let you know when I start writing the review, and when it'll probably published. I must say that these two products are the only ones I'm completely satisfied of; especially the performance in the sim is excellent. And the lack of a 2D panel...who cares about a panel when you've got such a nice virtual cockpit ?! The only thing I regret is that there is an amphibious version; something my 'colleague' Ian at Screenshotartist.co.uk pointed out too. Though rare in the real-world, it's a lot more useful for us bush-pilots in Flight Simulator...Joris(P.S.: you may want to check out my Photobucket album - check my signature for the URL -, some people say there are some pretty good pictures in it, and quite alot from the Beaver). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts