Jump to content

ORN

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ORN

  1. New super-pc Dag? I guess Photoshop is running very fast on that one ;)

    Come on Dag, paint the Beech and do Kofi and me a big favour.

    I have a suggestion: You paint it as if it was brand new, then hand the .psd file over to me, and I'll make a rusty, weary old version. Then we get two new paints made in Norway :). What do you say?

    Kofi, very cool paint you found there ...

    Eagle

  2. He he, that's funny! This is not a baloon Shawn ;)

    Anyway:

    Pilot: 165

    Co-polot: 165

    Passenger Seat: 0

    Passenger Seat: 0

    Mid R: 200

    Mid L: 200

    Aft R: 250

    Aft L: 250

    Tail: 300

    Eagle

  3. Hi,

    have anyone noticed that long after touchdown, after the tailwheel is down and all wheels spinning, the plane is still hovering some inches over the runway? Here's an example:

    air.jpg

    Eagle

  4. That's a nice paint Dag!

    With your style and class I'm sure you could make an awesome Twin Beech with more of a style like the Beaver below, B U T with this in mind:

    1. Cool: Spare part from another plane (tail fin)

    2. Not so cool: Weathering a bit overdone

    With more detailed and varied work, but the same general approach I think you could have fun making a rusty 18 :).

    Eagle

    14.jpg

    13.jpg

  5. Dag

    you´re THE painter, so I can understand why you like the hog. Just a brief look at Vin's latest screenies leaves no doubt, Aerosoft did a good job with that model.

    Actually I have decent system with a nVidia 7800GT and AMD Athlon 3500+. The texture loading time is not the worst part either (on my old system it was), the gauge refresh rate is the reason why I don't feel like flying the hog. Which again is no big deal, there are other planes to fly :).

    Btw, have you considered making a paint for the Beech 18? How about a really weary rugged and rusty bush Beech for smugglers. It would make a different challenge for you i guess, your paints are usually very detailed and well done, but also very new and shiny :). Just a thought ...

    Eagle

  6. However, since many companies now use these methods, I would hope future AEROSOFT releases would incorporate them :D

    Good point Kofi Superuser with strange name and 18 pixel high fonts ;). I would certainly hope that too! Of course I would welcome a "New VC Tech" F18 from Aerosoft or any other high end addon developer for that matter. I must admit though (although, as I said, it is not THAT critical) I was a bit surprised when the Twin Beech came with 6 vc sections, I have only kept 4 of them in order to get acceptable refresh rate.

    Eagle

  7. There's no problem to find a F18 external model (Aerialfoundry already mentioned), but I have yet to see a F18 with a decent interior/panel/vc.

    Also, (beware, I'm gonna be rude now) I'd rather have Cloud9 make it (MB339 style) if the Worthhog still is the Aerosoft way – it has way to detailed and cpu-demanding textures/model, and waaaaaay to slow gauge refresh rate. A fighter imho MUST be flyable with fluid ... everything. Things happen fast, and you can't take a cofee brake to wait for the gauges to refresh ;).

    In a plane like the Beech 18 (which I adore) the refresh rate isn't that cruical, slow as it is, but a fighter ...

    Aerosoft staff, please don't get me wrong, I love your work/company/service, but I think it's high time you jump on the the "new" VC wagon.

    Btw, I had a flight with the Seahawk yesterday (vc section 4,5,6,7 commented out in order to get decent refresh rate). The screenshots should speak for themselves, but just to let you know – the Seahawk is the only chopper I like to fly in FS9:

    http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...6&mode=full

    Eagle

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use