[FMC]

Thanks for the feedback Bjorn. Is there a reason there is no support for an fmc/gps to be slaved to the HSI and flown in NAV/LNAV mode? INS is just not practical in todays environment with complicated sid's and stars requiring RNP 5.

Regards,

Christian.

[FMC]

Are there any good add-on FMC's that works with this aircraft. I am just talking about the FMC, not the ND. An FMC that will couple to the HSI.

Regards,

Christian

[What is going on developers?]

Why are most of the new aircraft simulations targeted the light/medium market??? I am sick and tired of seeing nice fancy exterier models/VC's and bautiful pictures and great websites. Are the developers getting greedy and lazy?? Is it just too much work too create a complex simulation?? Limited LNAV,VNAV,FMC etz what a joke............its the brain and the heart of the airplane and should be modelled accordingly. What is going on developers???? VNAV and LNAV is used all the time in real life. Its the most efficient way of operating an aircraft. So why not modell it properly?? It is not difficult to learn and manage, and I really dont understand why the developers think its for advanced users only. Again, i think the developers are getting lazy and avoiding the complicated/realistic path. Its a shame really, because im getting tired of the Maddog MD82 and the PMDG MD11 (The only realistic products out there).

[FMC]

Nice package and a lot of fun to fly. I love the 2d panel!! The INS is a nice touch but I would love an FMC addition. Any chance of seeing an FMC version??? The INS requires the lat/long's, enroute charts and sid's star's with lat/longs. It is a lot of work for a casual "simmer". The FMC is also a bit more realistic in todays environment. Are there any realistic add-on FMC's that will work with this great package???

Christian