Thralni
-
Posts
358 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Thralni
-
-
-
Wow. That VC is looking great. I'm not sure how much more often I'm gonna say that, but it really looks genuine to me. Simply stunning.
You are absolutely right about that price, too. 30 euros is indeed a sweet spot for many people. 25-30, mostly. Go higher, and people start to doubt, or at least, I will start to doubt. One will have to tell me that the plane is of extraordinary high quality before I buy a plane of 50 euros. The PMDG FS9/FSX combo package, for example, is 82 euros... That's an awful lot, and I've been in doubt for the past year or so whether or not to buy it. I know I will enjoy the plan when I get it, but it's simply too much to spend right now on a virtual thing.
Tell you what: I will buy the Airbus, Mathijs, but I'll need to know for sure it's got good framerates. Any idea how the planes performes next to the Twinotter? That plane is super-detailed and has FPS like a default plane - a winner, for as far as I'm concerned.
-
Is this often a problem for you guys? I know in most places they are not fond of you taking poctures, but I thought most of Europe is quite okay with it.
-
The quality of that panel just keeps amazing me, you know that?
-
1
-
-
What's wrong with Air Astana?
Well, it's neither a company I ever flew with, nor a company from my father or motherland. Israir is from Israel, hence why I would like it. When I flew with Austrian Airlines, it was the first and last time I ever flew with an Airbus (yes, I know, I only flew once with an Airbus... I know, shame on me...). So, I got some weird emotional ties with these two. While it looks pretty, I have nothing to do with Air Astana. It doesn't "do" anything for me. I hope you understand what I mean, because I can't seem to find the correct phrase. I hope you will consider either one, or both.
-
My god, that really is some amazing stuff you got there! Really great how each of the blue-doored buildings actually have different fronts for each of them. Now that's the detail that I love and know from Aerosoft!
-
-
Kwiss: is there any product that doesn't do that? I thought it's built into the sim and therefore works with whatever plane you throw at it...
-
I think I'd probably only seriously fly this airbus with liveries of:
Austrian Airlines;
Israir.
-
They are working on it. Read this post:
http://forums1.avsim.net/index.php?showtopic=272958
That post contains all recent information on the 747-8, NGX, Dash 8 and 777. By the way, that topic title seems to suggest it is released... it is not.
-
What's wrong with the ESSA they did? I always really liked it. On the other hand, I don't like their EBBR that much. It's hard on my framerates, and for no apparent reason.
Whatever they did in the past though, I like what I've been seeing from their new EHAM scenery. Can't wait to see it "for real" on my own computer!
-
Well, in Holland there is a big shop at Aalsmeer. They would have just about any boxed FS product, I suppose.
-
777cpt: I really do not want to be rude, but you have no idea what you are talking about. It is clear you have no idea of the VRS Superbug; what it can do, how it looks like, sounds like; feels like when flying with it in your sim. Please, before you say anything more about the VRS Superbug, go read the review of it over at Avsim:
http://www.avsim.com/pages/0609/VRS/F18.htm
By the way, that video is from FS2004. The VRS Superbug is simply MIND BLOWING, too. Really, just read the review and should be clear to you that its functionality is far greater than Aerosoft's F-16.
NOTE: I'm not trying to put down Aerosoft's F-16 at all. I'm only trying to point out that the perfect F/A-18E simulation already exists, and I don't think Aerosoft could do a necessarily better job.
Jeez, how I hate it when small companies are kicked away into the trash because they are somewhat smaller and less known
-
1
-
-
Sounds good to me
-
Right now it's presented in the shop as if you get one package that inclues both FS2004 and FSX versions of the same thing, and that's what people get when they buy it... So, I'm not sure how it should be... Are you saying that the FS2004 should be a completely separate product?
-
Wait a sec, this problem now suddenly looks familiar. If I remember correctly, the installer sets a certain parameter in fs9.cfg to a certain value in order for the bridge in that screenshot of yours, to displkay correctly. If it is not at that specific value, you get this error I think.
From another thread:
"I read in the manual a note for fs9 users: the installer set the max_vertex to 21 iso 19 so that the bridges at the 24 threshold displays correctly. Setting up that entry in the fs9.cfg to 21 has its downside unfortunately, especially increasing in some paces the 'plateau effect'. I reverted mine to 19, although I am well aware 21 allows a higher terrain definition."
Could you go into your fs9.cfg, and check the value at max_vertex?
-
It's okay, I too don't really miss them... I think trying to reinstall for now is the way to go. If that doesn't clear up the problem, I say wait for Shaun, or send an email to support@aerosoft.com. They usually are relatively fast (and if they are not, PM Shaun. He will make them work harder
). -
But that is exactely what I'm pointing at, the road that goes under the runway plateau like in real life is not there!
No, I do not.
If you read the specification, it says that these two airports are included.
How do YOU know that they are not there then? Are you one of the developers?
So Shaun, do you have any ideas ?
Carl
Carl,
I know you are pointing at that, I have only tried to determine that the problem is not in the product but on your computer (because for me it works perfectly). Instead, the road that should be there seems to have moved a few hundred meters to one side. Why that is I don't know. Perhaps you find this useless, but I'm only trying to offer some help, you know...
I know what the specification says, and it is false. It has been said numerous times in various threads that ELUS and ELNT would not be included in the FS9 package. The first post by Christopher (chrieger) on this page: http://www.forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?showtopic=29993&st=60 will make you see this is true (he says no further airports besides ELLX will be included, and indeed, they are not there).
Aerosoft has to make it clear that the FS9 version doesn't include these two airports, and they should do it sooner rather than later. Multiple people buy the package, thinking they are getting a FS9 version of what we saw in FSX, which is absolutely false.
-
Still, even with this "going around the problem" stuff actually looking like it's going to work, can't Christopher simply, you know, "amend" the scenery and give us a tool so we can do this simply with one click, like in the FSX version? I really don't want to sound ungrateful, but I think this is elementary stuff that should be in a modern-day scenery...
-
Carl: from what I can see, Shaun did not show FSX shots. These must be FS9: in FSX, all the jetways and stairs have transparant windows, only in FS9 are they not transparant. As for the road, I think the road is there, but it has been moved. See the road that runs in front of the airport on the first shot? Now look at the shape of the "valley" where the road should be in, and compare it with the road that lies to the right of it (you can see it very well on the third shot). The road you see there should fit perfectly in the "valley" - where a road should be. Do you use anything that could have moved the road? UT:Europe perhaps?
Also, as I said just two posts before yours: ELUS and ELNT are not part of the FS9 version of this package!
-
VERY welcome to see Luxembourg is now available for fs9 - bought it as soon as I found it! ELLX is created in very good detail but I just wonder whether the airfields ELNT and ELUS should have any detail as all I can find is a strip but no airfield buildings? Also there does not seem to be a lot of extra autogen scenery away from the airport over and above what I would get with UT Europe. Is that the way it should be or has it installed incorrectly? Incidentally there were 4 new additions to the fs9 scenery library following installation - Luxembourg Airports, Luxembourg Terrain, Luxembourg Landmarks and VFR-Airfields Library.
Thank you for creating this for fs9!
Bill
That's how it should be. The FS9 release first was to have only ELLX, but the landmarks were later also included. ELUS and ELNT were never to be part of the FS9 version.
-
What can I say? I'm overly curious. Will check it out tonight. Before I do though: Thanks for supporting what seems to be becoming a minority in sales!
-
Ouch... That's a great pity... I want all my aircraft to move. Really, isn't there a way to get them out? Not wanting to sound ungreatful or anything, of course, but I find it a pity. Less space at the airport = less space for my AI traffic = greater chance I won't have space to park my aircraft once I land.
-
Very glad to see it's released! Looks very good, judging from the screenshots. To be honest, other than the non-transparant windows, I'm not sure what the differences really are. Are there any more big differences?
AEROSOFT - YOUR NEXT MISSION SHOULD YOU CHOOSE TO ACCEPT IT IS. . . . .
in English
Posted
Wait until the FSX version of the VRS Superbug is released! That plane has potential like I've never seen on any FS plane before.
I really urge you to read the review I did for Avsim: http://www.avsim.com/pages/0609/VRS/F18.htm