-
Posts
222 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by mikkel
-
-
Great, hopefully that will lead to a fix. The scenery is otherwise quite perfectly made, looking forward to seeing more sceneries from this developer in the future!
- 2
-
On 4/16/2024 at 7:46 AM, westbros said:
I am surprised that there has been no comment in the last 12 hours. The well-known streamer Chewwy94 did a pre-release stream of this scenery yesterday evening
What is a well-known streamer?
-
You're not able to notify the developers you're selling for?
- 1
-
Whats going on with the hue, saturation and gamma in these screenshots?
- 1
-
On 1/23/2024 at 7:58 PM, Tom said:
Perfect - I'll pass on the feedback regarding this and see what can be added.
Still not able to filter out simulator when searching.
I'm having a hard time to understand how it cannot be top priority to keep the shop competitive. -
This is an offical support forum for Aerosoft airport products?
- 1
-
Someone from Aerosoft care to comment on this visual glitch?
- 1
-
-
14 hours ago, amahran said:
And do you actually want bug reports or not? Because I’ve been documenting everything meticulously, but if Aerosoft is signaling that my effort is a waste of time by simply not acknowledging anything I’m reporting, I can go back to lurking and let this forum go back to being as quiet and inactive as the Twin Otter support forum. This crap takes time and makes my simming evenings take twice as long as they normally would be, and if my effort is wasted here, I’d rather do this whole reporting and feedback with a different aircraft, and help a developer that makes me feel like my time is well-spent.
Ball’s in your court.
I hope you'll get a sincere reply to this. I see the effort you've done, and hope it's appreciated.
- 1
- 1
-
Anyone?
- 1
-
-
Just read the newest update, and wonder what the heck you are up to regarding the project management of the A330. Developing more variants of the A330, before getting one of the models to market...?
Minimum viable product anyone?All aircrafts made for MSFS show that issues needs to cleaned out and features need to be fixed or even added after initial release, to satisfy customers expectations and match the evolving competition.
How did you come to the conclusion that you should develop a series of A330's in vacuum, one of them a completely different model (NEO), before releasing at least one of them to the public and get some cash-flow and customer reactions?
Sorry, it's not my business, but I really get the feeling of a project lacking serious professional management.
-
-
On 3/15/2024 at 7:54 AM, Lars K. Rønes said:
At this point, I think the best that would happen is that a respectable developer who actually cares about the product and the customers who buys it will develop a new CRJ which will leave this Aerosoft one in the dust.
You wonder what's nonsensical? That bullshit you wrote right there. Some buying the CRJ, but for developing a new one, etc... ? Makes no sense. And adding to injury, do you have any insight into how well documented the code for the project is? No.
And you know _this_ is not true:7 hours ago, Lars K. Rønes said:but it is quite clear that Aerosoft has no interest in the CRJ. Lets be real here, we're talking about finishing an UPDATE fixing bugs, not redeveloping a complete and new complex airplane...... It is inexcusable.
And since you know the written language to some extent, you are also able to read that a quite large update is in the works.
Sorry, but people should stop writing like teenagers when they are done with their teens, preferably long before.
But we can agree on that an update to fix open issues are long overdue...- 2
-
1 hour ago, Lars K. Rønes said:
At this point, I think the best that would happen is that a respectable developer who actually cares about the product and the customers who buys it will develop a new CRJ which will leave this Aerosoft one in the dust. I will definitely not buy anything Aerosoft again, unless the current attitude towards supporting products change, as well as proper communication towards customers. Nobody wants to listen to "We're working on it, trust us, it will come when its done" for a year or more.
I really wish you could delete this rather insulting and mostly nonsensical post.- 1
- 2
-
Yes, but since I don’t run the standard driver, as I need more configurations, and belive running both external software and the driver could lead to some conflicts, perhaps mapping the features from the standard driver to external software could be a good idea?
-
Thanks, are you able to post the variables used to control the default lights? So that users of external utilities can setup their device to get LED-behavior as intended?
-
My personal experience: The Bravo requires something like Axis and Ohs or Spad.next to work optimally.
-
This is a very serious performance issue you report here. Any official word from ORBX and/or Aerosoft? I've seen a few VDGS updates by Aerosoft the last couple of months. Not sure if thats related?
-
Sim-season is almost over, spring is technically here, and once the weather is alright in the north, the FS-computer will be disconnected until next winter. No CRJ before MSFS 2024 for me?
-
Anything new here, except the usual harassment of the developer?
I keep my hopes high.- 1
-
Any chance of Queen Maud Land being developed for the Aerosoft Antarctica series?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-first-boeing-787-dreamliner-lands-in-antarctica-180983340/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Maud_Land -
Just had a little look at the video, and after a few seconds (TC 0:56), there is a quite severe animation jump. In a way ruining the illusion.
-
Is it just me, or are there some over-sized coffee machines inside that building?
ENGM great work and some very minor bugs
in Airports
Posted
What are you doing inside a terminal-building anyways?