Lep

It didn't look that way -- check out this video -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUAljcc7TvU .

I saw a video of the BM model taking off by starting up engine from an upright position rather than the usual position of one wing resting on ground. Anyone knows how this can be done? Thanks.

Thanks, Peter. Will look up on that. Lep

I've done ridge runs with the netto and am getting good kicks out of it. A question I have on the "Speed To Fly" feature of the C4 -- I understand when in strong sink, fly the speed such that the C4 "petals" are horizontal. But this way I have to practically go into a steep descent and tend to lose lots of altitude (more than a 1,000 ft sometimes). Is it wise always to use Speed To Fly? Would it be better to sit out the fast descent and emerge into lift again soon? Seems to lose less height that way.

Thanks for all that. Haven't really tried the netto for ridge runs. Will give it a go this weekend. Happy flying and have fun.

Thanks, Joachim. But I think you mean to say 5 m/s approximately = 1,000 ft/min (x2 x100), right? Quite a difference here

Thanks so much for the detailed explanation, B21. Really appreciate it. I've been flying all flyable planes/helos (from small prop to Boeing) in FS for a long time, except for glider until now. And I must say I'm amazed (and surprised) at the complexity (and simplicity) of the ideas behind the gauges that allow us humans to glide around like the way an eagle is able to do so naturally. I'm now grasping the concept better I think. I see that in still air, the netto reads zero while the TE reads a small sink (the glider's intrinsic sink). And I learn to look closely at the netto for signs of

Thanks, Joachim. Okay will try to understand that.

Have been flying the Discus for weeks and liking it more each day. I'm now putting in more time in the D-4350 model, which has an additional Netto Vario in it. I read up on that and understand it shows the actual air mass up/down movement, minus away the glider's own sink rate. However, when NV shows a rising air mass, I see that the "winter" vario shows an even higher climb rate (eg. NV shows 450, winter shows 800). Shouldn't NV always shows a higher reading that the winter gauge, since it already has the glider's sink rate subtracted? The NV gauge shows a "m/s" on its face, but my FS i

Thanks, Peter. Will get on with practicing catching the thermals. Hope to get a more powerful PC for some real clouds soaring.

Hi Peter, Thanks for your detailed reply. I tried out one flight with a wider range of ceilings with Clear Sky setting and managed to get good thermals, especially over some mountain ranges. Two questions here I hope you could help further clarify :- 1) Under User-Defined weather setting, if I set a wind but NO cloud layer, can I still get Blue Thermal? 2) When there is Blue Thermal, with no cloud, is the number of these "invincible" thermals also decided by the Thermal Coverage setting in the config? Thanks.

Have been putting in weeks of flying in teh Aerosoft Discus with registered Cx and truly love it. There was one flight where I set the weather to Clear Sky and saw that there was to be a Blue Thermal (the Auto Thermals Box was shaded Blue). After winch-launching to 3,000+ feet, I flew around for a long while but there was not one single thermal to be found. (Had set config to have thermals from 500 ft to 8,000 ft). On another occasion, I had user-set wind to 16 knots, but with NO cloud set. Cx showed Green for Auto Thermals, but again no thermal was observed throughout the flight. Hop

Gosh ... how can I missed that?! I was looking for it in the C4's setting! Thanks. Lep

Hi Joachim, I've been flying in the Discus B almost exclusively now and am enjoying a lot the "joy of flights powered by nature". For the C4, I read up the manual but couldn't figure out how I may switch from the default vario mode to speed to fly mode. I understand the "petals" stand to show the same as the mechanical "winter" gauge, though it can also shows the speed to fly values which is helpful. As for the other features of the C4, are they mostly modelled too? Lep

Hi Peter, I've been using the registered Cx for over a week now and am totally awed by the great piece of work. However, I noticed the slipstream turbulence that's turned on in registered copy seems to be rather strongly simulated. I'm comparing this to what I observed in video clips I see, where gliders seemingly fly over mountain/ridge terrains without much of any turbulence in evidence. Mostly I have wind set to about 16 knots. Hope you could share on this issue. Thanks. Lep