Andrea1

member
  • Content Count

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Good

About Andrea1

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Andrea1

    Managed RNAV does not work

    Hi Mathijs, I'm sure your hard-work it'll be a successfull one, as usual, so good luck to you and all your team... Best Regards Andrea Buono
  2. Andrea1

    Managed RNAV does not work

    Hi, the same for me: EDDM RNP RWY 08L. RNAV (FINAL APP) doesn't follow the glide path.. Ciao Andrea Buono
  3. Andrea1

    Managed Speed at Cruise

    Hi, but starting by a "cold and dark situation" I've no problem ..i.e. with a cost index= 7 I got a cruise speed of 294 kias (I can't remember the mach n.) Best Regards Andrea Buono
  4. Andrea1

    Managed Speed at Cruise

    Mee too, my cruise (and climb speed) calculated by mcdu was 204 KIAS! (I selected 290 at cruise fl 210) and I've used 1.2.1.4. a320 cfm and a "turnaround state" situation Ciao Andrea
  5. Andrea1

    Status update

    Hi, 2d panels, a realistic tekeoff performance tool, a simpler way to import wind data i.e. similar to ifly 737: there you needn't to create a "WXR file" etc.: their software can import directly the wind data from active sky also if your route (made by simbrief or pfpx) is naturally different from that made by active sky..also descent wind are directly read by AS., a feature (maybe is already implemented, I can't remember) for having a landing distance, during autobrake, according with rwy state (dry, wey, icing i.e. by using weather data taken by active sky to "approximately" define the runway state (wet/dry/contaminated etc.)). Ciao Andrea Buono
  6. Andrea1

    Vertical profile update

    Hi Mathijs, Good luck! You right: It's a very hard work (I hope that 5 flight for each model will be sufficient..but maybe you need some ones more etc..). You're right: also the real Bus is a really complex machine! But we trust in you and your team, so good luck and keep all the time necessary to update the flight dynamics...5% of difference vs real data is a wonderful thing: also level D simulators have to respect this limit!!! Incredible, on considering the limits of fsx and p3d4..so good luck!!!! Ciao Andrea Buono
  7. Hi Meyerflyer, According to my A320 FCOM "In Flight Performance - Climb" 3.05.10 Section Table in ISA condition with a weight of 62 tons at brake release and normal climb profile (250kt/300kt/0,78Mach) you should arrive at : FL100= 4min (burning 420 kg of fuel), FL200= 8 min (about 800 kg fuel), FL250= 11min and 1000 kg, FL330= 17 min and 1370kg, FL350= 19min and 1460kg, FL390= 24 min and 1720 kg. Anyway Mathijs said they have been working and tuning all flight dynamics so we must have a little more patience, I'm sure they are doing an hard and very good work "behind the scenes" and we'll have a very realistic bird ASAP Best Regards Andrea Buono
  8. Andrea1

    zoom + preselected cockpit views

    Hi, me too: I've the some problems: all wiews are zoomable by using a318/319 but not zoomable by selection a320/321. I hope in near future to be able to use zoom feature also for my a320-321... Ciao Andrea Buono
  9. Hi, Me too I was flying with Active Sky . Conditions on departure (when I had that EGT excedance): LIMC 290/4 KT temp. 31C qnh 1017, takeoff from 35L I started from a "turnaround" state using an Easyjet G-EZDE livery A319... Maybe that data can help the betatester… Ciao Andrea Buono
  10. Hi Mathis Thanks, Anyway You Great! Superb model of A318-319 Incredibly very smooth on frames! Ciao Andrea Buono
  11. Hi to all, Just finish first flight with my A319 professional "bus".. Very easy on frame! At ground LIMC (aerosoft scenery) 40-55 fps on air 60-90 fps with active sky next.. Only bad thing..in real life I'd have to overhaul both my engines (CFM 56-5B) because during my takeoff at reduced thrust assumed temp 65°C on rwy 35L (31°C 1017 qnh ) I hadan EGT of 967°C!!! and you know that CFM56-5b EGT limit is about 950°C! . I do my apologizes but I forgot to check by your "future improvement list" if EGT curves will be "adjusted" in the very near future updates...I checked also by appling full rated power and I reached 1027°C!!! (in fact the first stage HP turbine has melted...very expensive to buy!!!!) ..you know in real life (new engine) EGT at takeoff should be in the range 800-850°...(and also considering an external temp of 31 instead of isa 15 being the EGT varying according with the square root of temperature ratio in kelvin it should in the range of 830-880) no more.. The second question is about the IAE-V2500 engine: during start this engine 'sFADEC should apply a 30 sec period of "dry crank" i.e. just engine start rotation to blow out the residual fuel etc before applying ignition (as happened with the previous version of the bus) but now this not happens. Best Regards and Congratulations Andrea Buono
  12. Andrea1

    Troubles with 1.21

    Hi Shaun. I will try a complete reinstall then! Thanks a lot Ciao Andrea
  13. Andrea1

    Troubles with 1.21

    Hi, just installed v. 1.21 troubles I discovered (but, apart load manager already present in version 1.20): load manager got a dry operating weight completely wrong being the real DOW of an A320 let's say from 42 to 44 tons (depends on airline specific equpment and seats configuation) the load manager giving 37400 kg (this issue had been corrected in version 1.20 but reappared in 1.21); engine parameters are completely wrong (like the previous editions): ground idle of CFM56 real Airbus (according to real A320 FCOM) should be: (sea level 1013 mb 15°C=ISA conditions and static): N1%=18-20 N2=58-60 with 390-460 ° EGT and fuel flow of 250-500 kg/h (let's say 350): Airbus X gives: 23-25% n1 I can't remember N2 but should be 63-67% and fuel flow 1100-1150 kg/h! (this is not caused by a FSX limitations or by the fact that this simulation is "basic" another software house made a FS9 basic edition of the A320 giving the correct engine parameters...so not so difficult to simulate!) but thungs are also wrong at higher power settings: at max rated takeoff thrust airbus X gives a fuel flow (sea level 1013 mb etc) of only (about) 2560 kg/h now, considering a CFM56 rated at 27000 lbs of static thrust (12250 kg) and a static specific fuel consumption that for a "high-bypass" turbofan like the Snecma-CFM56 should be around 0,35 kg per kg of trusth I should read about 4300 kg/h on the fuel flow meter, (considering that the airplane is not static but it's moving the fuel flow should be also a little higher also if the power should be a little lower but anyway I should read a value between 4200-5000 kg/h) a 2600 kg/h would mean engines are developping about only60% of the rated static thrust! The last but the most important: after lift off when I, i.e. at 500 ft AGL, put the A/P engaged the plane goes nose down in a dive and crashes! No Working FBW! (no joystick issue having calibrated it before flying as usual) Like version 1.20 but worse than version 1.40, now the plane is unflyable! (I would check my trim settings but with version 1.40 I, without changing any trim, obtained a flyable aircraft after taking off and engagina my A/P!!! Any chanche to have soon a flyable "basic" plane, (please)? Ciao Andrea Buono
  14. Andrea1

    Some advices...

    Hi Mathijs, Anyway as soon as I'll have some ideas that maybe could helping you in make your airbus better I'll tell you. Best Regards Andrea
  15. Andrea1

    Some advices...

    Hi Mathijs, Anyway as soon as I'll have some ideas that maybe could helping you in make your airbus better I'll tell you. Best Regards Andrea