Jump to content

eefields

members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About eefields

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

519 profile views
  1. I used GDBCF, and rebooted and now all seems to be normal in airbus land! Thank you guys. You can close this now.
  2. I am using the following livery: And this one: First, I dragged the Texture files into the following location: C:\Program Files (x86)\aerosoft\Aerosoft A318-A319 Professional\SimObjects\Airplanes\Aerosoft A319 IAE Professional The texture file for both of these are as follows: [fltsim] fallback.1=..\..\Aerosoft A318-A319 Professional Base\Tex_FB_VC fallback.2=..\..\Aerosoft A318-A319 Professional Base\Tex_FB_A31X The aircraft config file located here: C:\Program Files (x86)\aerosoft\Aerosoft A318-A319 Professional\SimObjects\Airplanes\Aerosoft A319 IAE Professional Looks like this: [FLTSIM.5] title = Airbus A319 United Airlines N803UA sim = A319IAE model = PL2WINSAT panel = sound = texture = United_N803UA kb_checklists = AirbusA321_check kb_reference = AirbusA321_ref atc_id = N803UA atc_airline = United atc_flight_number = 1000 ui_manufacturer = Airbus ui_type = A319-131 IAE ui_variation = United Airlines (Blue Tulip) ui_typerole = Commercial Airliner ui_createdby = Aerosoft atc_parking_types = GATE atc_parking_codes = UAL description = Airbus A319 IAE / United Airlines (Blue Tulip) N803UA \nwww.aerosoft.com \nRepaint by Sam Wozniak [FLTSIM.6] title = Airbus A319 UNITED AIRLINES (MERGER) N813UA sim = A319IAE model = PL2WINSAT panel = sound = texture = UAL N813UA kb_checklists = AirbusA321_check kb_reference = AirbusA321_ref atc_id = N813UA atc_airline = United atc_flight_number = 1000 ui_manufacturer = Airbus ui_type = A319-131 IAE ui_variation = United Airlines (Merger) ui_typerole = Commercial Airliner ui_createdby = Aerosoft atc_parking_types = GATE atc_parking_codes = UAL description = Airbus A318/A319 - A319 IAE / United Airlines (Merger) N813UA \nwww.aerosoft.com I've tried to change the model to the PL2WINSAT, PL2WIN, DAIBA, GDBCF, and sharklet. What in the world am I doing wrong? I still have the black back half of my aircraft.
  3. Tonight I was doing the following: KORD-KDTW in the CRJ700 Route: RAYNR BRTMN DNIKA TAAYZ PETTY MKG POLAR6 - Exported this route from Simbrief Initial programming I set up everything including my take off runway 28R. BTW, this is where I notice the first problem. Not all the runways appear at KORD. However, if you select one, the rest will appear and you can select the correct runway. Also, while here, I removed the Airports from the display suing the MFD Menu. Took off from KORD on rwy 28R intersection EE with runway 28R selected. Normal climb. Between PETTY and MKG started planning my descent and arrival. Because I had imported from Simbrief, my plan had everything but the approach runway selected. So, I went in and selected 4R. However, as I got closer, I was told I would switch to 4L. So, I went in to change the runway and unlike other FMS, I can't for the life of me figure out how to change the runway. I deleted the 4R in the flight plan and then went back to DEP/ARR to select a runway. Now, none of the runways appear. I clicked the ARR Data to see if I could get any clues there and BAM, CTD. When flying, I pop out both of the Displays (MFD) and the Map (don't know the technical term). Not sure if that has anything to do with it. I'm on P3D V4.2 and 1.0.5 version of the CRJ. I'm running Windows 10, 16GB ram and a GeoForce GTX video card. I allso have Aerosoft Cities Detroit and FSDT ORD and GSX running. Behind the scenes I have Active Sky and ENVTEX and ENVSHADE running. Hopefully this will get you some more info. Glad the Nav issue is at least fixed. I'm in process of doing the flight again but I'm not going to select my runway until right before I get close on my approach. Thanks, Eric
  4. While silence means "we are doing lots of work" may be reassuring to some, I don't often find that reassuring. Think of when you fly. If they airline makes no announcements, most folks don't take that as progress. As a former airline station manager, I found customers were much more understanding when we provided frequent communication, even if we could only say "we're working on it." I've never had a problem like this with an Aerosoft product so this just seems very out of the norm. As a customer who owns a "SLEW" of Aerosoft products, I'd just like them to take that feedback and put it to good use. There are other developers that are know for releasing buggy aircraft and make no attempt to communicate or fix the issue. I certainly don't want Aerosoft to begin to earn a reputation in that category.
  5. I'm not asking for them to rush the fix. I'm asking them for them to communicate. Did you notice when the last communication was from somebody from Aerosoft? I believe it was posted back on January 4th? Another vendor recently announced a delay for their twin engine aircraft but they posted an announcement. With that I will patiently standby all day. I just want to know what's going on because in this case I've already paid the money for a product that, for me, is unflyable. And before you tell me to hand flight I wanted a hand flying aircraft I buy a DC-3. The point is is supposed to have an SMS on an autopilot that will follow a navigation. All I'm asking for is a little communication about what's going on.
  6. Another week gone by with zero information or update. I'm quite patient but this is really becoming frustrating. Some have said, you should just hand fly the plane when the issues arise. The problem is that it starts from takeoff and continues to landing. It is a serious quality issue. I've always had really good luck with Aerosoft products but for me, this calls into question their customer service. I simply can't understand why Aerosoft isn't even telling "hang on please, we are working on it." I would even be patient with "we are having a hard time fixing it and don't have an ETA." But to hear absolutely nothing is so damn frustrating. Come on Aerosoft. This is not who you guys are, is it? Do I need to reconsider each and every future Aerosoft product when it comes out?
  7. Hans, Any update on this challenge? Would really love to get this bird back in the air but the persistent LNAV issues are keeping me grounded. Eric
  8. Is there any update to the direct to and FMS tracking? Really want to fly my bird but...
  9. Thanks for continuing to work on this issue. Looking forward to getting my CRJ working perfectly! Eric
  10. Yep, direct to and basic flying NAV still is hinky as hell. I was doing the following IDA GWEDO FRNCH3 First off, could not capture the Direct to GWEDO. I disconnect the NAV and did Direct to the next waypoint and enabled NAV and the aircraft just started turning right in a never ending right hand turn. I then hand flew it back on to the path. Tried to enable again NAV and it held a straight line for some time but then started drifting off just as if NAV was not even enabled. Also, the FMS path indicator shows the aircraft is way left of the path even though the aircraft was on the path. At this point, I'm going to just have to put her in the hangar and come back much later. So sad cause I was so excited. Eric
  11. I see some chatter that indicates the issue may not be fixed in the .10 version?
  12. @nealmac, sorry, not fixing it for all of us. Waiting patiently for the update!
  13. Looking forward to getting her back in the air. However, until the FMS zig zag issue is fixed, she will have to remain grounded. Thanks for your work on getting an update out!
×
×
  • Create New...