Jump to content

Barnesy2006

Members
  • Posts

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Barnesy2006

  1. Hi Mathijs,

    I am using Vista 32bit. I have tried deactivating and then reactivating the Data Execution Prevention and i know get the following Stackhash error:-

    Problem signature:

    Problem Event Name: APPCRASH

    Application Name: fs9.exe

    Application Version: 9.0.0.30612

    Application Timestamp: 00534d69

    Fault Module Name: StackHash_586c

    Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0

    Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000

    Exception Code: c0000005

    Exception Offset: 0775056e

    OS Version: 6.0.6002.2.2.0.256.1

    Locale ID: 2057

    Additional Information 1: 586c

    Additional Information 2: c2c0012f670e367647f2f382a2e0dc6b

    Additional Information 3: 4053

    Additional Information 4: 6d464395e62f70b13caace935f0b552c

    I have searched the current error and this reuquired me to do a system file check through command promt but still no success.

    Anymore info would be hugely appreciated.

  2. Hi,

    About a week ago now i was flying in FS2004 when the application closed due to an error, i didn't think anything of it and closed the program. I tried loading up FS2004 today but the program crashes straight away with the following error codes:-

    Problem signature:

    Problem Event Name: APPCRASH

    Application Name: fs9.exe

    Application Version: 9.0.0.30612

    Application Timestamp: 00534d69

    Fault Module Name: StackHash_9d35

    Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0

    Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000

    Exception Code: c0000005

    Exception Offset: 00000000

    OS Version: 6.0.6002.2.2.0.256.1

    Locale ID: 2057

    Additional Information 1: 9d35

    Additional Information 2: e64a2cbd66b66452fa48e63966352f62

    Additional Information 3: d5b7

    Additional Information 4: 70f715ce653fe314c2f27f6207428c77

    I have tried several searches for information and rectifications of this error but with no luck.

    Has anybody else experienced this error or know a way of fixing it?

  3. Hi Mathijs,

    I have attached a screenshot after i had changed the parking to "randomize" the only way to return this to normal is to replace the file with the original untouched afcad file.

    post-10503-0-79605200-1345057849_thumb.j

  4. Hi All,

    Is there anyway to edit the afcad for Sharm El Sheikh without the scenery messing up?

    If i edit the afcad in anyway once i load HESH in FS9 there default tower and buildings appear in the middle of the apron, the only way to correct this is to copy the original afcad back into the scenery folder.

    Any help would be appreciated.

  5. I have around £500 to spend excluding money that i can get for selling the parts i will need to change.

    100fps would be nice but unfortunatley i'm not linked up to the local power station to run it :lol:

    Regards

    Steve

  6. I downloaded and tested Stockholm in FSX the other day but i only managed to get 10fps at best. Granted i did have most sliders at max, but i don't see the point in running FS9/FSX at only half its full potential. This is the first time i have downloaded an add-on scenery for FSX as i see potential for it and the fact that some developers will eventually stop producing FS9 products. My problem was though that i was only getting 10fps and at this speed i won't make the switch. My current system consists of a AMD Phenem 9600, 2x 2GB OCZ RAM, 2x Sapphire 3870, Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6 motherboard, Tagem 580w PSU. I was thinking of changing my 2 graphic cards for a single ATI 4870 x2. Would this upgrade make much difference to the framerates as i have also read that FSX requires alot of power from the CPU and if this is the case what kind of upgrades would you suggest? I like to fly complex airliners such as the PMDG, Level-d to sceneries such as Madrid, JFK with active sky and lots of AI. To be able to run all this at an exceptable FPS all your suggestions and experience would be appreciated.

    Thanks

    Steve.

  7. Could someone please help me out then as i have:-

    AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core Processor GP9600 2.3Ghz

    4GB of OCZ Ram 1333MHz DDR3 (2x 2GB)

    2X Sapphire ATI 3870 Graphic Cards

    Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 AMD 790FX (Socket AM2) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard

    And all the running on Windows Visat Ultimate edition.

    The problem is that i don't seem to be able to run FSX with good framerates. Even with sliders near the middle at St Maarten in the default Cessna i

    only get between 8-15 FPS. Surely i'm doing someting wrong but i am yet to find it? So for the mean time i'm having to stick with FS9 which gives me

    great FPS with everything maxed out.

  8. I agree that AES would enhance Garys scenery so much more. I have just purchased Birmingham Extreme and it just isn't the same arriving on stand with no activity. Has nothing more been mentioned on the possibility of a Lite version? It would be such a shame for UK2000 to lose business on a fantastic series of sceneries over Garys firm stance on not using AES. I think most simmers now only fly to AES'd airports as these are the more realistic ones, I mostly fly from Simwings Heathrow but only because of the AES facility.

  9. I tried to find a "private message" option but did not. This post is to Barnesy2006, everyone else vote for Manchester.

    Barnesy try this demo if you ever wanted to step into Sir Alex's shoes. The best football simulator out there (yes I have played PES/Winning Eleven).

    http://fm08.footballmanager.net/en/article/100/index.html

    @Paul,

    This is in no way a hijacking. As I've already voted I too would love to see EGCC but I just had to share the best football (the word "soccer" :angry: is not in my vocabulary) game out there with a fellow Man U fan if he hasn't discovered it yet.

    Thanks, i play them all the time and have had the current one from when it came out.

  10. If Gary doesn't mind using AES as long as it doesn't affect the scenery, then surely all ground feautures could be used except stands with active docking. So for example stands with active docking just have pushback feature, but all the others have everything including steps for boarding as the jetway won't move. Bristol and all remote stands throughout the Xtreme series could also use all the features??

  11. Harpsi,

    I have just tried your modified afcad and with the wind blowing from 270 the whole thing was a mess! I had aircraft back tracking down all runways for takeoff and landings? Is that because from 270 i should be using the southern afcad??

    Thanks

    Steve

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use