Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 I'm running v1.21 of PFPX with Navigraph cycle 1507. I planned a flight with the PMDG737 from EGCC to EGKK this morning. For a westerly departure on 23R I was assigned this routing:- N0429F230 LIST2R LISTO P18 UTUXA UN859 KIDLI ASTR2B The problem is that SID is restricted to non-jet aircraft and certain other aircraft which don't include a 737-800. The correct SID should have been SANBA which is for jet aircraft only. Any reason PFPX preferred the LISTO one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ln-asm 1 Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 I don't know exactly how PFPX works, but I guess it doesn't account for the selected aircraft type and just looks at the shortest/best routing with the current weather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 5, 2015 Author Share Posted July 5, 2015 I don't know exactly how PFPX works, but I guess it doesn't account for the selected aircraft type and just looks at the shortest/best routing with the current weather. It wouldn't be a very good planner if it didn't take into account the aircraft type. But it is a very good planner so hence my question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 421 Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 Currently PFPX isn't aware of type Ray, it is an intended implementation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 5, 2015 Author Share Posted July 5, 2015 Thanks Stephen. That's surprising but I can work around that for now. Any idea when it might be implemented? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 421 Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 I can only say it is the system for implementation following a support ticket Ray. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 5, 2015 Author Share Posted July 5, 2015 Thanks Stephen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torben Andersen 15 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 you can edit the airport properties and assign J or P to SID/Stars. Hopefully this would give the result you want. Torben Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 421 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Hello Torben, Currently an addition to the aircraft properties is required to make use of the filters to which you refer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 6, 2015 Author Share Posted July 6, 2015 I have to admit to being quite surprised this feature wasn't included when this program was released. The word 'professional' is bandied around a lot with products but this one really does look the business. Hence my surprise that this is a feature which needs adding a couple of years after release. Hopefully we won't have to wait too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatrickM 49 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 You can set SID/STARS for Prop/Jet only in the airport properties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 6, 2015 Author Share Posted July 6, 2015 Patrick, Did you read Stephen's reply above? A modification is required to PFPX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BW901 58 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 You can indeed already classify terminal procedures as Jet or Prop only, but you can't yet specify whether a particular aircraft type is a Jet or a Prop. I started out in the business nearly 30 years ago. We flight planned manually, First step was get the charts out and trace out a route, then hand-write into a form and find a calculator to work out time and burn calculations. When the new-fangled computer arrived in the office we still got the charts out to check what the software churned out. Roll on to 2015 and although I'm no longer involved directly in ops the lads who do the planning in our various group airlines all complain about their flight planning systems being "stupid". After 30 years the same warning remains. Never trust what comes out of the printer, always do a sanity check. Real-world automated route finder algorithms are not perfect - PFPX is more real than you may think! Jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlightSimSoft.com 283 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 PFPX v1.22 is now aware of jet/prop type and selects departures/arrivals accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NedH 6 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Very nice. However the new SID out of EGCC to EGKK goes almost all the way to Cardiff before turning back towards Gatwick! Not PFPX's fault of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 421 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Very nice. However the new SID out of EGCC to EGKK goes almost all the way to Cardiff before turning back towards Gatwick! Not PFPX's fault of course. To which SID are you referring? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 12, 2015 Author Share Posted July 12, 2015 Stephen, This is what it gave me for a 737-800... KUXE1R KUXEM P17 NOKIN N862 ERNOK L9 KENET ASTR1F As Ned say's Cardiff is not usually on this route unless it's a sight-seeing flight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 421 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Ahh, not an issue with the SID extending to Cardiff but the route. For any planning within UK airspace I would recommend consulting the Standard Route Document Jamie has also created a utility to generate the SRD/PFPX routes allowing selection from the flight planning menu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 12, 2015 Author Share Posted July 12, 2015 Stephen, Two points. That document you pointed us to is 692 pages long. I trust you're not expecting us to read through its entirety to find the solution? Second point. The link to the utility takes me to the same NATS page. I would have hoped that PFPX could integrate UK rules into the product so when we enter two UK ICAOs we get a sensible plan. If every other country has its own rules how on earth can we expect PFPX to generate logical routes? Or is it only the UK that has these 'rules'? I'm finding more often that generating a route in PFPX does introduce some dog-leg routing and it's only when I go to the Advanced option and generate it there I get a sensible routing. That is disappointing. If I go into Advanced and deselect Ignore RADs I get a sensible route... SANB1R SANBA UN859 KIDLI ASTR2B So why can't the default mode give me the same routing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 421 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Updated the second link Ray, thanks for the heads-up The SRD is easily filtered selecting the departure airport or waypoint of entry and finding the arrival or exit. Hopefully the SRD will be implemented in to PFPX at some point taking into account it updates every 28 days based on the AIRAC cycle. When you start adding in the expanding Free Route Airspace, Borealis Europe fully implemented target 2020, areas using Route Availability Document directs in place of airways it will be quite a task to keep up with Europe alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted July 12, 2015 Author Share Posted July 12, 2015 Looking at that document Stephen I don't realistically see how PFPX could keep up with all the world-wide rules. But for the EGCC-EGKK route the SRD has suggested SANBA N859 KIDLI WILLO3B which isn't too different from that in the Advanced Edit option. That option does at least provide a sensible routing. The default supplied earlier is clearly ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NedH 6 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 This is strange. For EGCC to EGKK if I go to advanced and check "Ignore RADs" I get the route that Ray got SANB1R SANBA UN859 KIDLI ASTR2B But if I go back to advanced and uncheck "ignore RADs" I get another entirely different route EKLA1R EKLAD UY53 NANTI L8 STAFA P18 TELBA UL151 KIDLI ASTR2B which is not the same as the original extremely long route. Looks like there are some inconsistencies here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted December 7, 2016 Author Share Posted December 7, 2016 Gents, I'm sorry to resurrect this thread but I've been flying Concorde most of this year and have just switched back to the 737-800. Using PFPX v1.27.3 and AIRAC 1216 if I plan a flight from EGCC to either EGLL or LFPG PFPX is still selecting the LISTO SID which is only for use by aircraft with a MTOW of 35000KG or non-jet aircraft. The correct SID for 737s and heavier is SAMBA. Is there no way PFPX is able to select the most appropriate one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs Tom A320 4915 Posted December 7, 2016 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted December 7, 2016 Hello Ray, as far as I know the nav data (NavDataPro and Navigraph) this kind of information is not included in them. So PFPX has no means to know that "by default". But you should be able to add it manually into the Restricted Departure Procedures/Waypoints configuration of the Airport Data. Please login to display this image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted December 7, 2016 Author Share Posted December 7, 2016 Thanks Tom. Although not ideal I've restricted the LISTO SIDs from Rwy 23L and 23R to Prop Aircraft only. That has resulted in me being assigned the SAMBA SID. At least there is a workaround for which I'm grateful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.