GuiLaMon 0 Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 What are the simulated weights Aerosoft used for the development of these aircraft? I'm looking for values for the following ... OEW (Empty Weight): MZFW (Max Zero Fuel Weight): MTOW (Max Takeoff Weight): MLW (Max Landing Weight): Max Fuel Capacity: Thank you, max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Reverse 344 Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 You can check yourself, by using the integrated Load- and Fuelplanner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuiLaMon 0 Posted December 29, 2014 Author Share Posted December 29, 2014 Thanks for the reply Werner. I started at that application, but wasn't sure which combination of fields I needed to play with to get the respective base values, so I turned to the forums for a bit more direction. I was hoping it would be documented somewhere, but came up blank in any documents and even on the forums (perhaps not using the right query terms). I'd like to use these values to add this aircraft to my fleet in SimBrief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedbird 25 0 Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 Hi! I just wanted to do the same thing, adding the aircraft at simbrief and I also didn't find any weights. The fuel planner does not provide any numbers on the various weight limitations. So did you find the correct numbers? Thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedbird 25 0 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Hi! The following link in simbrief lists the figures for A320: http://www.simbrief.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=415 I then figured out the figures for the A321 by playing around with the fuel and payload values. Find attached a table for both A320 and A321 weights given in lbs and kgs. Regards, Stephan airbusx_weights.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.