sdlc 5 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Hi all On the A320/321 CFM the fuel flow for medium N1 is the double of the real fuel flow (low altitude). At ~50% N1 we have 2000-2200 kg/h. This range of N1 (45-65) is used for approach and low speed fly (GD, S ect…). The result is a doubled fuel used for standard app or holding. It’s more penalizing for long approach with opposite runway like LFPO/LFPG (around 300-400 kg more). I think the gap is due to the choice of engine parameters internally calculated instead of FS standard calculation (cfg+air).With idle and toga FF in the PRF file, the FF is linearly calculated. Maybe, the simple solution to avoid a too complex PRF file is to insert only one intermediate table for mid N1 or an "balance" function in the engine gauge code. It's my humble opinion Stephane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.