CCarter 0 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 The file is being saved to the correct folder, in the .rte format, but no route exported to NGX/777 format with v1.07 has worked when I try to load it into the 777. Files from v1.06 and previous all still work. If I manually enter the Origin and Destination in the FMC and select "Route Request" the file is displayed, but when I click on it I get "Invalid Entry" as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCarter 0 Posted September 17, 2013 Author Share Posted September 17, 2013 More information: A green bar comes up along the top of FSX that says "Destination Airport Not Found in .rte File: Import Aborted" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simul8 12 Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 As a workaround. Input the DEP and DEST on the RTE page, then import the Route using the CoRTE RSK. S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCarter 0 Posted September 17, 2013 Author Share Posted September 17, 2013 As a workaround. Input the DEP and DEST on the RTE page, then import the Route using the CoRTE RSK. S If I manually enter the Origin and Destination in the FMC and select "Route Request" the file is displayed, but when I click on it I get "Invalid Entry" as well. I've tried that. I've been successful creating routes for KMLB-KLAX, KATL-KLAX, and EDDF-KLAX but unsuccessful in creating routes for EHAM-KLAX, EHAM-KSFO, and EHAM-EDDF. Dispite the fact that the error message refers to a problem with the destination airport, it appears that it is a problem stemming from EHAM. Here is the EHAMKLAX01.rte output: Generated by PFPX 17 Sep 2013 19:58 UTC 35 EHAM 1 DIRECT 1 N 52.308 E 4.764 -11 ----- 1 0 1 -11 - -1000000 -1000000 BERGI 5 UL602 1 N 52.749 E 4.359 0 0 0 0 AMGOD 5 UL602 1 N 52.975 E 3.685 0 0 0 0 SUPUR 5 UP1 1 N 53.015 E 3.564 0 0 0 0 GODOS 5 UP1 1 N 53.249 E 3.430 0 0 0 0 BINBO 5 UP1 1 N 53.402 E 3.341 0 0 0 0 ROKAN 5 UM982 1 N 53.663 E 3.189 0 0 0 0 ERLOT 5 UM982 1 N 55.287 W 0.585 0 0 0 0 ROBEM 5 UM982 1 N 55.459 W 1.021 0 0 0 0 RITSI 5 UM982 1 N 55.702 W 1.657 0 0 0 0 SAB 5 UM982 1 N 55.908 W 2.206 0 0 0 0 FINDO 5 UP58 1 N 56.369 W 3.464 0 0 0 0 NEVIS 5 UP24 1 N 56.695 W 4.545 0 0 0 0 ORSUM 5 UP24 1 N 57.052 W 5.295 0 0 0 0 NINEX 5 UP59 1 N 58.856 W 9.500 0 0 0 0 BALIX 5 DCT 1 N 59.000 W 10.000 0 0 0 0 6320N 5 DCT 1 N 63.000 W 20.000 0 0 0 0 6630N 5 NATB 1 N 66.000 W 30.000 0 0 0 0 6640N 5 NATB 1 N 66.000 W 40.000 0 0 0 0 6550N 5 NATB 1 N 65.000 W 50.000 0 0 0 0 6360N 5 NATB 1 N 63.000 W 60.000 0 0 0 0 IKMAN 5 NATB 1 N 62.500 W 63.000 0 0 0 0 FEDDY 5 SCAI 1 N 61.700 W 67.000 0 0 0 0 IRLAV 5 SCAI 1 N 57.974 W 80.000 0 0 0 0 LITRO 5 SCAI 1 N 53.363 W 90.000 0 0 0 0 FERNO 5 SCAI 1 N 51.647 W 92.872 0 0 0 0 YRL 5 V181 1 N 51.071 W 93.762 0 0 0 0 YWG 5 DCT 1 N 49.928 W 97.239 0 0 0 0 DIK 5 DCT 1 N 46.860 W 102.773 0 0 0 0 OCS 5 J107 1 N 41.590 W 109.015 0 0 0 0 URNUW 5 J107 1 N 39.134 W 112.104 0 0 0 0 MLF 5 DCT 1 N 38.360 W 113.013 0 0 0 0 LAS 5 DCT 1 N 36.080 W 115.160 0 0 0 0 HEC 5 DCT 1 N 34.797 W 116.463 0 0 0 0 KLAX 1 - 1 N 33.942 W 118.408 126 ----- 0 0 1 126 - -1000000 -1000000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Hello, There is an issue with the 777 accepting airports with negative elevation in a saved flight plan. According to the link below, it has been fixed in an upcoming update: http://forum.avsim.net/topic/418750-pmdg-777-issue-tracking-thread/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCarter 0 Posted September 17, 2013 Author Share Posted September 17, 2013 Hello, There is an issue with the 777 accepting airports with negative elevation in a saved flight plan. According to the link below, it has been fixed in an upcoming update: http://forum.avsim.net/topic/418750-pmdg-777-issue-tracking-thread/ Thank you for that link. I'm glad they're aware of it, and I'm glad it's not just something I'm doing wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Testpilot 1 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 You did it wrong!All you've first tested is EHAM from or to.When I see, EHAM -> xxxx, EHAM -> xxxy and xxxz -> EHAM does not work, I would take EHAM out!You did it and it worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCarter 0 Posted September 19, 2013 Author Share Posted September 19, 2013 You did it wrong! All you've first tested is EHAM from or to. When I see, EHAM -> xxxx, EHAM -> xxxy and xxxz -> EHAM does not work, I would take EHAM out! You did it and it worked. This is trolling, right? You're "solution" precludes using exported routes to or from EHAM. That isn't viable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCarter 0 Posted September 19, 2013 Author Share Posted September 19, 2013 This is trolling, right? You're "solution" precludes using exported routes to or from EHAM. That isn't viable. Your* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.