Jump to content

Upcoming FSGRW implementation


Recommended Posts

I have both updated progamms, PFPX and FSRGW. To use FSRGW weather we have to set the FSRGWpath: "current_weatherbylatlon.txtl" . But I don*t have this file on my system. Plaease explain this path.

We are in contact with FS Global real Weather developers to add an integration for PFPX.

Depending on when we get all required information from them, FSGRW implementation should become available soon . maybe even this week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lothar,

it is already explained her, you have to click the DATA Exchange under Genrell in FSGRW and than you can find the file in "

your drive":\FSGRW\data\exchange\common.

Regards Axel

By the way, Christian has wrote a couple of ours before your last message that FS Global STILL working on an update for winds aloft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Christian,

No, this does not work for me, I get the error: "Can't Load FS Global Real Weather (FSGRW) Weather Data"

I notice in "Configure Weather Settings" the filename in the path given to FSGRW is: "current_weatherbylation.txtl" - this has an extra character in the file extension... would this be the problem?

In FSGRW two files are in the "common" folder - "current_weather.txt" and "current_weatherbylation.txt" but only "current_ weather.txt" is being populated. Does this mean that FSGRW have not got their end working yet, or am I the only one with this problem?

Cheers,

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahmmmm, sorry to interrupt here,

but I'm a little confused now. My information (out of the FSRGW forum) is that FSGRW support for PFPX will be added in Build 15, which is not yet available for the public because of final testing. Build 14 does NOT write the current_weatherbylatlon.txt file. But PFPX still seems to read the current_weather.txt file from FSGRW.

Maybe Christian could shed a little bit more light into this. What will be the benefit of the current_weatherbylatlon.txt file, which Build 15 of FSGRW will be able to write in comparison to the current weather implementation of FSGRW? Is this file only for supporting the PMDG 777 ?

Thanks & best regards,

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did some testing and tried to route through several windchanges at FL360, this is what I got out of PFPX (1st entry) and FSGRW (2nd entry):

PFPX:

UM191 RIDAV 100 FL360 359/019 454 12 12.6 / 2.4 01 00:26

-50 456 1664 N4032.1 W00548.5 ...../.....
FSGRW:
RIDAV 36.000 ft 23 nm 00:03 97° 24°/ 20 kt -50 °C -
UM191 DIPOL 100 FL360 341/020 454 52 12.4 / 2.7 07 00:33
-50 462 1611 N4025.1 W00441.6 ...../.....
DIPOL 36.000 ft 51 nm 00:06 97° 326°/ 19 kt -49 °C -
UQ300 HAMRA 156 FL360 221/027 455 142 10.5 / 4.5 18 01:16
-DAAA -49 458 1280 N3652.3 W00001.4 ...../.....
HAMRA 36.000 ft 142 nm 00:18 155° 236°/ 28 kt -48 °C -
UA34 BAHRI 173 FL360 217/033 456 35 10.3 / 4.7 05 01:21
-48 433 1245 N3618.7 E00004.2 ...../.....
BAHRI 36.000 ft 34 nm 00:05 172° 215°/ 28 kt -48 °C -
UA604 ABLOD 154 FL360 225/051 458 116 8.4 / 6.6 16 02:06
-45 438 917 N3114.4 E00229.9 ...../.....
ABLOD 36.000 ft 117 nm 00:16 154° 229°/ 55 kt -45 °C -
Sometimes the difference in wind direction seems to be a little high (see the first two waypoints), most of the time it fits quite good.
What seems to be also very strange are the altitude jumps in FSGRW flightplan, which is based on the pln file exported from PFPX.
Chris

BER121 LPOV-DRZA.txt

document.pdf

post-78584-0-79095400-1379522017_thumb.j

LPOVDRZA01.zip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use