jeroedel 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 Hi Team, first off all thx for this creat software. I hve one smal question. How can I add speed and alt restiction in the Flightplan from PFPX so that it well be export to the CFMU valedation. If i enter the restiction here in the route section it will be delete after clicking "build" If I enter it here it will be delete automaticly after pressing "compute flight" and will also not take over to the CFMU valetation tool Here I can enter the restritions on a normal way and valedation work, but this changes will not be take over in the OFP This is an important option to calc with restriction like below BR//Jens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlightSimSoft.com 283 Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 When rebuilding a route, the entered restrictions are removed What restriction did you enter in the 'Speed/Altitude' window? The screenshot shows now restrictions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Author Share Posted August 31, 2013 Hi Christian, I select from the drop-down menu Waypoint "ERIMO" and enter FL110 as alt restriction speed I leave it blank. It will be not applied to ATC Route and also to the CFMU validation tool in my case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Author Share Posted August 31, 2013 Hi Christian, here the missing Screenshots And here you can see the result, the output in the ATC Flightplan and Valedating tool Normally it looks like this ASPIS/N0418F310 UN134 ERIMO/N0329F110 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasey 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 I have been able to reproduce this behaviour and it seems to have something to do with aircraft profile, as it only happens (to me) with 737-800 Winglets. Using B738 profile (w/o winglets) or Airbus Extended ones, restrictions are met on the OFP generated during the compute flight phase. I hope this helps to find where the problem can be (any important difference between these profiles?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Author Share Posted August 31, 2013 I have been able to reproduce this behaviour and it seems to have something to do with aircraft profile, as it only happens (to me) with 737-800 Winglets. Using B738 profile (w/o winglets) or Airbus Extended ones, restrictions are met on the OFP generated during the compute flight phase. I hope this helps to find where the problem can be (any important difference between these profiles?) Hi Christian, Kasay is correct, I change the aircraft profile to MD11 and it works well change I back to B737-800 I had the same issue. Nothing else is changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elad 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 i have the same issue BTW as LLBG`s VATSIM ATC the only restirction is FL310 Over LEDRA/ERIMO/ VELOX and not FL110 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Author Share Posted August 31, 2013 I think I found 50% of the issue. In some Aircraft Profiles is the closing tag <EROPS/> set but with out the opening tag. If you remove the closing tag, than it will be work for Routesegments like this "MAGIS UN134 ERIMO" but if you also select an Waypoint on the way on UN134 like ASPIS it didn't work. BR//Jens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Author Share Posted August 31, 2013 i have the same issue BTW as LLBG`s VATSIM ATC the only restirction is FL310 Over LEDRA/ERIMO/ VELOX and not FL110 Shalom Elad, I know this but I take this out of the real life ATC FP from AB flight 2 weeks ago. BR//Jens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elad 0 Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 ok...if u says so... it is very uneconomiclal to be FL110 in this area :-) i will chk the issue with profile does someone from the developers or beta testers has some opinion on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasey 0 Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Don't know if I have found a valid solution but in any case I'd like to share. I have seen that 737-800 winglets profile includes these two lines which are not included on 737-800 w/o winglets: <StdCruiseMode>24</StdCruiseMode> <AltnCruiseMode>20</AltnCruiseMode> I tried deleting them on 737-800 Winglets profile (so it read like the w/o winglets one) and tried your route. The result (ATC plan): (FPL-RYA-IN -B738/M-SDE1FGHIJ1RWXYZ/LB1 -EDDM0925 -N0427F350 VAVOR UM867 ABISO UY450 NERRA UL607 KEA UL52 MAGIS UN134 ASPIS/N0414F310 UN134 ERIMO/N0308F110 N134 SOLIN -LLBG0327 LLSD -PBN/A1B1C1D1L1O1S1 NAV/RNVD1E2A1 DOF/130901 REG/PRUEBA EET/EDUU0011 LOVV0012 LJLA0024 LDZO0034 LYBA0107 LAAA0114 LGGG0128 LCCC0241 RVR/200 -E/0416) Bias and performance data seem to be OK (in fact, I haven't altered any of these parameters on the txt file). I'll try some other routes to see if I can find any noticeable non-wished effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frederic29 5 Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 hi all, I've got the same problem when i try to validate a flight between LPFG and LLBG with a boeing747 i have the same error. I want to know why in the restriction page above it's write "not available for traffic" plus "above FL310"... Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elad 0 Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 for some reason this is what it doing now after tried Kasey tweek (FPL-ELY-IN -B738/M-SDE1FGHIJ1RWXYZ/LB1 -EDDM1020 -N0450F350 VAVOR UM867 ABISO UY450 NERRA UL607 KEA UL52 MAGIS UN134 ERIMO/N0487F230 N134 SOLIN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted September 2, 2013 Author Share Posted September 2, 2013 the issue is coming up again for me. some tweaks above don't work for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarkko 39 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Is there a confirmed fix for this problems? I'm having the same thing happen on route EGFF - LFQQ. When using E175, I get the following route: N0357F230 ALVI1B ALVIN L9 DVR L10 RINTI/N0328F190 B3 TRACA TRAC1A The problem is, that I can't descend from FL230 to FL190 on B3 as FL190 is the max from B3. I had FL set to OPT on the main planning tab and FL190 set as a restriction for DVR on the advanced tab, but the FL190 will not "stick" when I calculate the flight. Any ideas if I'm doing something wrong? EDIT: tested with version 1.04 and AS1309 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted September 2, 2013 Author Share Posted September 2, 2013 Hi Christian, the issue is still there. EDIT: tested with version 1.04 and AS1309 BR//Jens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted September 5, 2013 Author Share Posted September 5, 2013 Hi all, is there any news? The issue is still exists BR//Jens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlightSimSoft.com 283 Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 There was an issue deleting manual vertical revisions using 'minimum fuel' calculation. Fixed in 1.05. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroedel 0 Posted September 6, 2013 Author Share Posted September 6, 2013 Hi Christian, thx for the post. Is there an expected relase date for 1.05? BR//Jens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elad 0 Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 thanks Christian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elad 0 Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 looks like the restriction in working now after updated 1.05 thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatrickM 49 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Can someone rebuild this route? It's a small hop from Oslo to Hamburg... (FPL-NAX73O-IS -B738/M-SDE1FGHIRWXYZ/LB1 -ENGM0855 -N0454F380 TOR P615 ALS M852 ALASA P615 EKERN T905 BOGMU -EDDH0109 EDHI EDDW -PBN/A1B1C1D1L1O1S1 NAV/RNVD1E2A1 DOF/130919 REG/LNNIB EET/EKDK0023 EDVV0052 EDWW0055 RVR/200 OPR/NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE PER/C RMK/TCAS EQPT -E/0203) Normaly I should descent to FL240 after ALASA, but when I select ALASA @ FL240 in the Speed/Altitude bar it get forgotten on the computed flight, so everytime I get an CFMU error. Any advise? Thank you in advance! PS: I'm using NG1310 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elad 0 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 I think that the problem is that acording the proflile you are already in descent Stage of FLT, so it doesnt calculate the restiction I dont Know if it is suppose to be like this, anyway when i added restriction befoe TOD ( FL240 @RIDSI) CFMU pass, don't know if it is ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatrickM 49 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Strange and interesting at the same time! Thank you very much... I should be on FL240 @ ALASA and here we are now... Thank you again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.