Jump to content

Why should we be mandatorily charged with subscription when...


Recommended Posts

...we already have a weather engine? (eg ActiveSky)

I believe another package for the product should be made available, without the one year subscription. Just the application itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...we already have a weather engine? (eg ActiveSky)

I believe another package for the product should be made available, without the one year subscription. Just the application itself.

I believe PFPX is worth a lot more than it is being sold for. Seems like we are even then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...we already have a weather engine? (eg ActiveSky)

I believe another package for the product should be made available, without the one year subscription. Just the application itself.

I don't think (actually, I know) there's anything mandatory about the subscription. The subscription gives you direct access to the data, but as far as I can see you are quite able to load weather data from other providers into PFPX without the subscription. This won't give you tracks and NOTAMs (but then again, neither does Activesky...)

http://flightsimsoft.com/pricing/#subscription

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

View it this way, the one year subscription is included free of charge when buying PFPX.

Nothing is ever "free of charge".

If the subscription was not included, the product itself would have a lower price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use