Airbus339 129 Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Navigraph, 1.10+15+16b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Che. 1601 Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Under Investigation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheyenne Chief Pilot 829 Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Looks like you're too high for that approach and the FMGS is calculating orbits to lose altitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airbus339 129 Posted June 17, 2013 Author Share Posted June 17, 2013 Looks like you're too high for that approach and the FMGS is calculating orbits to lose altitude. I really don't think so ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jovabra 1 Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I'm looking at a picture in the MAP mode. How is the display in the other modes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airbus339 129 Posted June 17, 2013 Author Share Posted June 17, 2013 It was the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen_DL3FY 49 Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 hi, in order to assess the need to complete flight plan is used !cu Juergen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airbus339 129 Posted June 17, 2013 Author Share Posted June 17, 2013 Well, LAM3A is always the same ... coming from Frankfurt, Munich or Tokio. However this is the flight plan LTFE AKBUK N128 IMR UN128 PEREN UN133 EVIVI L863 OKANA UL863 RAVAK UY505 BEO UM749 TONDO UL610 BATTY UL608 LOGAN EGLL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen_DL3FY 49 Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 hi, have maked a alternate and short route from EGGW (Luton) to EGLL ... EGGW CLN7C LAM3A LAM EGLL you can see ... if have used the STAR 'LAM3A' and the transition 'LAM' for the rwy 27R. I cannot see any problem with this route ... see PIC I will fly this route too cu Juergen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airbus339 129 Posted June 17, 2013 Author Share Posted June 17, 2013 I appreciate your effort but if you check charts, it's different from your screenshot (ND screenshot). I don't see any "S-shaped" arrival Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen_DL3FY 49 Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 hi, that's right ... maybe I made ​​a mistake when I select the TRANS in the MCDU1. The aircraft actually flew as it shows the blue line (see pic) ... i will repeat this flight cu Juergen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen_DL3FY 49 Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 hello,I have since made ​​the flight again ... but there are two important events1. could not find the transition LAM (ILS27R) ... then I have simply inserted the relevant WP's in the MCDU1.The WP's are: LAM11 BNN15 BNN19 IRR10 and IRR75 2. from the WP 'LAM11' the airplane flew then to a another WP ... but with the same name 'BNN15' (see PIC) cu Juergen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheyenne Chief Pilot 829 Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Looks like you're too high for that approach and the FMGS is calculating orbits to lose altitude. TAGAS is way outside the London area (way outside ...). So it's just like Joshua stated already in his post #2: "Under Investigation." BTW, the same approach with NavDataPro looks pretty similar to the OP's approach with NaviGraph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Che. 1601 Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Just a simple recheck to look to see if the issue is resolved: Marking this as solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heidem 5 Posted August 11, 2013 Share Posted August 11, 2013 Perhaps an AIRAC issue (using Navigraph AIRAC 1308) but it looks a lot different on my flight with the 321 today. I've attached a screenshot. The flightplan is OJAI TALMI J10S BGN UH1 PURLA UH1B SUVAS UL53 KAROL UL995 RDS UL609 MES UG18 GIKAS UN133 EVIVI L863 OKANA DCT TONDO UL610 BATTY UL608 LOGAN. Arrival is LAM3A, EGLL 27L via LAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Che. 1601 Posted August 11, 2013 Share Posted August 11, 2013 Perhaps an AIRAC issue (using Navigraph AIRAC 1308) but it looks a lot different on my flight with the 321 today. I've attached a screenshot. The flightplan is OJAI TALMI J10S BGN UH1 PURLA UH1B SUVAS UL53 KAROL UL995 RDS UL609 MES UG18 GIKAS UN133 EVIVI L863 OKANA DCT TONDO UL610 BATTY UL608 LOGAN. Arrival is LAM3A, EGLL 27L via LAM. Hi, Perhaps I should have stated it more clearly, It is solved in one of our internal test build, no problems there. In other words, in the next update, you should not see the same problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heidem 5 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Thank you! I'll look forward to that update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.