Talk to the management? Here's your chance...

[WalSch 495]

vor 3 Stunden schrieb Jonas S.:

Sie sollten nun in der Lage sein den gewünschten Text zu veröffentlichen.

Übrigens, das habe ich längst getan. Und ich habe schlicht und einfach intelligente Menschen und nicht einen "dummen" Algorithmus meinen Text beurteilen lassen.

 

[Jonas S. 466]

Hallo Walter,

 

vielen Dank für deine Antworten. Kannst du versuchen die Datei(en) erneut hochzuladen? Kannst du mir, falls das nicht funktionieren sollte, Details zu den Dateien geben? Sind es mehrere? Welche Dateiendungen sind es?

 

Bezüglich des Wort-Filters schreibe ich dir gleich eine private Nachricht.

[WalSch 495]

Guten Morgen Jonas,

 

Ich hab's eben versucht, geht aber nicht. Es sind mehrere Dateien, die alle die Endung .zip haben, zwischen 20 und 80MB gross sind und mit der Software 7-Zip verpackt wurden. Ich wollte sie einzeln hochladen, da es sich um sieben liveries für verschiedene Flugzeuge handelt. Das Problem sind aber nicht meine zip-Dateien, denn in anderen Foren liessen sie sich anstandslos hochladen. Das Problem ist eure Software, die nur Dateien verkraften kann, die maximal 2MB gross sind.

 

Please login to display this image.

[mopperle 4162]

Das Problem besteht in der Tat noch. Scheint eher ein Serverproblem als ein Problem der Forensoftware zu sein.

[WalSch 495]

Am 27.3.2023 um 09:53 schrieb mopperle:

Das Problem besteht in der Tat noch. Scheint eher ein Serverproblem als ein Problem der Forensoftware zu sein.

Weisst du, dazu fehlt mir das vertiefte technische Verständnis, als dass ich die Ursache eures Problems dermassen explizit differenzieren könnte.

[Jonas S. 466]

Hallo Walter,

 

das Problem sollte behoben sein. Bitte erneut probieren. Ich bitte die Unannehmlichkeiten zu entschuldigen.

[WalSch 495]

Danke, Jonas, für die Benachrichtigung. Ich werde es bei einer mir passenden Gelegenheit mit ausreichend verfügbarer Zeit mal probieren. Was ich jedoch bei einem kurzen Blick bereits gesehen habe und darum jetzt schon sagen kann, ist, dass die

Please login to display this image.

 nicht in jedem Fall ausreichend sein wird. Denn eines meiner sieben liveries, die ich hier im DM anbieten wollte, ist gezippt 80MB gross, weil es insgesamt 13 umgestaltete Objects-Texturen enthält, inklusive einiger angepasster Normals. Und für allfällige Szenerien mit Custom Objects wären die 63MB ohnehin und von vornherein viel zu wenig, ausser man würde eine Szenerie in mehrere Zip-Dateien aufteilen. Was aber eigentlich nicht im Sinne des Erfinders wäre. Wobei noch nicht getestet wurde (zumindest nicht von mir), ob eure Software pro Upload nur eine einzige Datei ≤63MB zulässt, oder ob auch mehrere Einzeldateien ≤63MB pro Upload möglich sind. Aber ich werde mal schauen, was ich mit meinen liveries machen kann.

 

Gruss,

Walter

[Detlef Fenske 1]

Ich verstehe nicht, warum das PFPX Forum nun endgültig geschlossen wurde. Ich dachte, dies seien Community Foren, in den User auch User unterstützen. Herr Kok hat es nun vorgezogen, das Forum ganz zu schließen. Immerhin hat Aerosoft das Produkt mal hoch beworben und auch an seine bislang treuen Kunden verkauft. Herr Cooke hat sozusagen freiwillig einen Support gestellt und tat es bis Mittwoch dieser Woche auch noch. Zudem stellt er im Download-Bereich noch die aktuellen RAD Restirictions bereit. Ich habe das Produkt von Aerosoft erworben. Vielen Dank für den Support an Herrn Cooke bislang!

 

I don't understand why the PFPX forum has finally been closed. I thought these were community forums where users also support users. Mr. Kok has now preferred to close the forum entirely. After all, Aerosoft advertised the product highly and sold it to its loyal customers. Mr. Cooke voluntarily provided support, so to speak, and did so until Wednesday of this week. In addition, he provides the current RAD restrictions in the download area. I purchased the product from Aerosoft. Thank you for the support Mr. Cooke so far!

[mopperle 4162]

22 minutes ago, Detlef Fenske said:

Ich verstehe nicht, warum das PFPX Forum nun endgültig geschlossen wurde. Ich dachte, dies seien Community Foren, in den User auch User unterstützen. Herr Kok hat es nun vorgezogen, das Forum ganz zu schließen. Immerhin hat Aerosoft das Produkt mal hoch beworben und auch an seine bislang treuen Kunden verkauft. Herr Cooke hat sozusagen freiwillig einen Support gestellt und tat es bis Mittwoch dieser Woche auch noch. Zudem stellt er im Download-Bereich noch die aktuellen RAD Restirictions bereit. Ich habe das Produkt von Aerosoft erworben. Vielen Dank für den Support an Herrn Cooke bislang!

 

I don't understand why the PFPX forum has finally been closed. I thought these were community forums where users also support users. Mr. Kok has now preferred to close the forum entirely. After all, Aerosoft advertised the product highly and sold it to its loyal customers. Mr. Cooke voluntarily provided support, so to speak, and did so until Wednesday of this week. In addition, he provides the current RAD restrictions in the download area. I purchased the product from Aerosoft. Thank you for the support Mr. Cooke so far!

I think the reason is quite simple: Flightsimsoft was always responsible for supporting this product. In fact for the last 2-3 years, there came zero support from their side. Although they are still selling this product via their unsecure website, they are not showing any interest in further developing or doing a minimum of maintenance. This was the reason why Aerosoft took it off from the shop. And it was a concession from Aerosoft to leave the froum open.

But now questions came up regarding the support for NavdataPro. But instead delivering the necessary files to Aerosoft, Flightsimsoft ignored everything and only maintened another product. So now tell me why should Aerosoft keeping open a forum to support a product while the dev has zero interest in cooperation with Aerosoft? And remember the Aerosoft Forum is not a public forum, it is a company forum. But I'm sure Flightsimsoft will offer you an alternative, in case they are interested in you as a customer.

And yes, thanks a lot to Stephen Cooke for doing what should have been done by Flightsimsoft.

[Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558]

7 hours ago, Detlef Fenske said:

II don't understand why the PFPX forum has finally been closed. I thought these were community forums where users also support users. Mr. Kok has now preferred to close the forum entirely. After all, Aerosoft advertised the product highly and sold it to its loyal customers. Mr. Cooke voluntarily provided support, so to speak, and did so until Wednesday of this week. In addition, he provides the current RAD restrictions in the download area. I purchased the product from Aerosoft. Thank you for the support Mr. Cooke so far!

 

I have spoken and thanked Stephen myself, what he did was beyond what anybody could expect.

 

I made the forum read-only because without backup from the developers we simply have to withdraw fully from the project. Just think about what would happen if a Windows update makes it crash, our forum would become a sorrow pit that would make us look very bad, even though we are unable to do anything. It is time to say goodbye. If Stephen feels the need to keep offering his expertise I I am sure he will find a place where to do so, our company forum is no longer the correct location.

 

The way this fantastic product 'whimpers' out is painful, the last thing we would have liked. It is just not in our control.

[WalSch 495]

Dear leadership team,

Is Aerosoft the right place to host accounts that offer pornographic content? This is of course only a rhetorical question. But one might still come to the conclusion that this forum is the right place for it. Because I reported such a porn account to the moderators using the green help button a month ago and the answer was that my report would be forwarded to those responsible. Furthermore, considering the fact that this porn account is still active, one could come to the conclusion (only purely rhetorically, of course) that nobody at Aerosoft is responsible for it.

Perhaps this impropriety will now become the focus of those responsible at Aerosoft, since it was not done via non-public reporting. Quod erat demonstrandum.

[mopperle 4162]

14 minutes ago, WalSch said:

Dear leadership team,

Is Aerosoft the right place to host accounts that offer pornographic content? This is of course only a rhetorical question. But one might still come to the conclusion that this forum is the right place for it. Because I reported such a porn account to the moderators using the green help button a month ago and the answer was that my report would be forwarded to those responsible. Furthermore, considering the fact that this porn account is still active, one could come to the conclusion (only purely rhetorically, of course) that nobody at Aerosoft is responsible for it.

Perhaps this impropriety will now become the focus of those responsible at Aerosoft, since it was not done via non-public reporting. Quod erat demonstrandum.

Just sent you a PM

[WalSch 495]

vor 2 Stunden schrieb mopperle:

Just sent you a PM

I read your PM, but I am very sorry. I unfortunately do not have the time to do the job of the people responsible or the forum algorithm. I think I more than fulfilled my responsibility and duty as a forum user with my report. But I am sure that if you look in your help inbox you will find my report with all the information you need. I had sent it pretty much a month ago. Recognizing that it is a porn account would be child's play even for an intelligently programmed algorithm, simply by checking the URL noted in the account's contact methods. At least that's what I did a month ago and immediately came across the naked truth. Luckily I'm not American, otherwise I probably would have been so shocked by this immoral experience that I should have made an appointment with a psychiatrist immediately. 

Thanks for your attention.

[mopperle 4162]

Sorry, just wanted to offer a solution, but as I'm not Aerosoft staff, I have no access to the internal system. So you have to wait till somebody reponds earliest on Monday.

[Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558]

4 hours ago, WalSch said:

Dear leadership team,

Is Aerosoft the right place to host accounts that offer pornographic content? This is of course only a rhetorical question. But one might still come to the conclusion that this forum is the right place for it. Because I reported such a porn account to the moderators using the green help button a month ago and the answer was that my report would be forwarded to those responsible. Furthermore, considering the fact that this porn account is still active, one could come to the conclusion (only purely rhetorically, of course) that nobody at Aerosoft is responsible for it.

Perhaps this impropriety will now become the focus of those responsible at Aerosoft, since it was not done via non-public reporting. Quod erat demonstrandum.

 

 I am responsible for that but I am unable to find any report from around a month back 

 

If you tell me where to find any porn on our forums I will, of course, remove it. 

[WalSch 495]

vor 22 Minuten schrieb mopperle:

Sorry, just wanted to offer a solution, but as I'm not Aerosoft staff, I have no access to the internal system. So you have to wait till somebody reponds earliest on Monday.

Don't worry, I personally have no problem with it. It's more Aerosoft's problem in my opinion.

 

vor 13 Minuten schrieb Mathijs Kok:

I am responsible for that but I am unable to find any report from around a month back 

It was someone of your staff named Jonas who responded to my report. But to make things easier for you:

 

glogzpoynnkxe - AEROSOFT COMMUNITY SERVICES

 

Just check the noted website URL.

[Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558]

Okay, so we went from our forums hosting porn to a link in a user's profile.  Not quite the same, and we tend not to check what a user wants to show there. Having a link there to a porn site does not violate our rules.  So as long as there is no porn on our forum, I will close this issue.

 

[WalSch 495]

vor 4 Minuten schrieb Mathijs Kok:

Okay, so we went from our forums hosting porn to a link in a user's profile.  Not quite the same, and we tend not to check what a user wants to show there. Having a link there to a porn site does not violate our rules.  So as long as there is no porn on our forum I will close this issue.

 

 

OK no problem. I just don't know the subtleties of your forum philosophy. In this case everything is fine and I apologize for waking up sleeping dogs. And besides, the profile picture does indeed show pretty eyes (and even four of them).

[ahmed2003 110]

Hello Aerosoft, What about the a330 project? How is it going? no one talks about since you closed its big forum. I know you have dedicated a page for posting any new update about the a330 every week and some weeks you don't. Are we near to the release date? or it will be available in 2024?