Jump to content

Hardware poll


Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]

Your hardware (read post below poll first)  

727 members have voted

  1. 1. What's your CPU like

    • Intel Core i7 class, pretty fast
      368
    • Intel Core i5 / AMD Phenom II X4 class, more then okay
      143
    • Intel Core i3, Core 2 Quad / AMD Phenom, Athlon, Opteron
      110
    • Slower then all that
      106
    • not sure, that's the thing under the fan right?
      0
  2. 2. How much memory do you have

    • 8 GB or more
      362
    • 6 GB or more
      143
    • 4 GB or more
      170
    • 3 GB or more
      33
    • 2 GB or more
      15
    • 1 GB or more
      3
    • Not sure, for sure some!
      1
  3. 3. What's your harddisk like?

    • SSD + Storage HD
      201
    • Fast raided HD
      109
    • Standard HD
      407
    • Not sure.... that the thing that stores my documents right?
      10
  4. 4. What's your Graphics Card like?

    • Top end >$400
      160
    • High end >$250
      273
    • More then okay >$150
      220
    • More less okay >$75
      62
    • Low end / on motherboard
      10
    • No idea, do I need one?
      2
  5. 5. What OS are you using?

    • W7 / 64 bits
      596
    • W7 / 32 bits
      37
    • Vista / 64 bits
      20
    • Vista / 32 bits
      12
    • XP / 64 bits
      4
    • XP / 32 bits
      55
    • None Windows
      3
    • Not sure, looks nice though.
      0
  6. 6. How do you connect to the Internet

    • Cable / ADSL 8Mbit/s or more
      379
    • Cable / ADSL 4Mbit/s or more
      169
    • Cable / ADSL 1Mbit/s or more
      114
    • Cable / ADSL below 1Mbit/s
      38
    • Dialup
      1
    • Not sure
      26


Recommended Posts

Hello ,

Nice work on your scenery everything running on full graphics settings. CTDS only when approaching airports with AES lite, Like Germain Airports 3 and Innsbruck. (EDDW and Innsbruck ) but a workround to disable aes lite can solve the issue. You can always fix this or give me a solution to resolve it.

my specs below

I7 920 OC @ 4+ Ghz with water cooling

Nvdia GTX 580 3096 MB memory OC from Factory (recently changed my 2 x 5970) (kinda of downgrade but upgrade for FSX)

6GB ram ,

W7 Ultimate 64Bit

I am waiting for the enthusiast version of I7 next gen about to release at the end of the year

Regards

Thanasis Chatzikampouris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Core 2 Duo E7400 2x 2.80GHz Processor, 4096MB RAM, 640GB HD, NVidia GeForce GT 220, Vista 64-Bit.

This is my sytem. I see lots of great systems, but don't forget the customers with the not-so-good-systems ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently in school at the moment so that helped to generate my interest in computers along with my friends. I would have preferred to get nitty gritty with the old computer swapping out parts but that would have been like strapping a Trent 900 to the Wright brothers plane. So instead about four months ago I got my hands on the computer you see below, custom built. With great power came great responsibility and I had a rather eventful few weeks getting FSX to play nice with the new toys but as of late I have finally be spending more time in the manuals for my 737NGX rather than my motherboard, I haven't mentioned this in my sig but i also have a rather puny Saitek Cyborg X which is next on the list for replacement. The more I can bog down my system the better it seems to preform, which means its high end scenery AND aircraft, not just one or the other. So I can enjoy flying my holiday routes in amazing accuracy with Aerosoft scenery and PMDG.

I think rather than aiming your products entirely at one range of computers or another, you should allow for them to be highly customizable. For example selectively removing parts of the addon scenery (maybe one could have just the airport scenery and not the runway/taxiway textures. This way everybody gets what they want.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldn't it read "more than okay" instead of "more then okay" in your little survey?

Though I am only a light fsx simmer (Q6600 @ 3,19 GHz, 8800GT, Vista 32, 4GB Ram), I still think that FS addons should be developed with tomorrows hardware in mind (but not of that one coming up 'in the next month', if you get it). I bought Katana 4X and can fly it even with my system in ORBX australia and with REX, though I am satisfied. Keep it up. And change the spelling error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ein schönes Grüß-Gott an alle!

Diese Abstimmung finde ich sehr gut. Ein sehr großes Anliegen für mich und sicher auch für andere FS-Nutzer: Aerosoft entwickelt und veröffentlicht viele super Produkte, allerdings nicht immer für beide FS-Versionen (FS-9 und FS-X).

Ich weiß das der FS-9 schon in die Jahre gekommen ist, aber es ist immer noch ein tolles Flugsimulationsprogramm.

Es wäre schön die neuen Produkte auch noch für den FS-9 zu bekommen, natürlich bin ich auch bereit dafür etwas mehr zu bezahlen. Ich habe zwar auch den FS-X, mit allen Servicepacks, aber dieser läuft nicht besonderst gut auf meinem Computer, so das ich wie viele andere auch noch hauptsächlich im FS-9 fliege, außerdem habe ich auch im FS-9 ca. und nur an ADD-ON's (das meiste davon an Scenerien und ein paar Flugzeuge) an die 300 GB installiert und viele dieser Titeln gibt es leider nicht für FS-X, oder Updates davon. Da zähle ich noch nicht mal die, die ich aus den FS-9 in ein temporeres Lager (bzw. Festplatten-Hanger) ausgelagert habe und nur temporär im FS-9 nutze, da kommen ca. nochmals 100 - 120 GB dazu. Und so alle 4-6 Monate "wächst der FS-9" weiter. Über die Jahre kommt also so einiges an ADD-ON's dazu.

Selbst wenn es denn alle Titeln für den FS-X gäbe, bei dieser Größe alles in den FS-X zu tranferieren, und alle Lizenzschlüssel zu aktiviern, monstroeuse Arbeit, ohne dabei zu denken das da eventuelle Probleme enstehen könnten, da glaube ich, ich würde Monate dazu brauchen bis wieder alles ungefähr so installiert ist wie im FS-9, abgesehen davon das der Speicherbedarf im FS-X viel größer als im FS-9 ist.

Also vielen Dank für diese Möglichkeit der Abstimmung und des Feedbacks.

Ganz liebe Grüße aus Graz - Austria

AM

PS: PC-Daten:

Asus P5N-T

Intel Core 2 Quad CPU

Q6600 @ 2,40 GHz

RAM: 4,00 GB

Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT _ RAM: 512 MB

All HDD: ca 3,5 TB

Sound Blaster Audigy

Windows XP Prof. 32 Bit

CH-Flight Sim Yoke LE

CH-Ruder Pedals

CH-Throttle Quadrant

MS-Force Feedback 2 Joystick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flight Sim Computer

CPU-i7 975 @ 4.1GHz

6GB PC3-12800 6-8-6-24

Nvidia GTX 480

OS-Win7 Ult 64b

OS 160 GB Intel X25-M SSD

FSX-Corsair P256 SSD

Really looking forward to Antarctica X and the CRJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a little comment: I'm pretty satisfied with my current system and I hope seeing Aerosoft developing FSX native sceneries like EDDM or Zurich. Maybe a complete reworked EDDF would be very nice!

Beside this: as every big company they have their ups and down, but overall I'm very happy to have Aerosoft ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until now, I have always been very happy with Aerosoft products, so keep your quality up! Nevertheless, you should still keep an eye on the product's frame rate. Really looking forward to Dusseldorf Mega Airport X and the CRJ Series! You do a great job, so keep it running! ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also like Aerosoft. I don't have to much of your products now but I will buy some like Anchorage X.

One of your best products, I think, is your Kantana. Very nice to fly!

So keep killing that bug! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have 2 systems running....

2.8Ghz i7 - 8Gb ram - 7200 hard drive x 2 - Asus p7p55d-le - Nvidia gts450 1Gb - running fs9 and fsx accel.

3.3Ghz i5 (@ 4Ghz) - 8Gb ram - hybrid 7200 hdd - ssd (for fsx) - Asus p8p67 pro - Nvidia 550ti 1Gb - running fsx sp2.

Both windows7 64bit. and a LOT of Aerosoft scenery along with a few utilities and stuff from other vendors. All gradually upped over the years from a P75 (yep 75Mhz) running FS95... now all home built for a fraction of what that first pc cost lol.

John Ellison

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently have a AMD Phenom II x4 processor, does a good job, but hear the Intels are better for FSX, Would love to get i7, but that would mean a new motherboard and a complete reinstallation of fsx, i do not want to do that with all the add-ons i have for it. As long as i am getting more than 15fps at all times i am a happy man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

my system is quite low end, (E600) Nvidia 9600GTO 6 gig of Ram, but it runs most things reasonably well, I have the occasional scenery glitch, but nothing I can't live with. If I can find a more powerful processor to fit my mobo, that would be my next upgrade, then a better graphics card. Other than that I'm reasonably happy.

Cheers

Zebedee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use