ManuelL 71 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 Overall scores - sorry, ditched the last leg. First leg - the landing was not good admittedly and I found that the Sperry auto pilot can't handle the turbulence generated by active sky. Manuel RTWC piloting Douglas DC3PWk ended Monday, August 29, 2011 at 11:26 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 49.71 Miles Wind: 18 Knots Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: PADU TO IKO : NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 49 Mins 54 Secs Landing Score:27.39 Landing was successful in the following areas:Gentle touchdown. [676 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [67 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [237 feet]Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems:Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%]Poor alignment with runway on visual approach - line up and stay there. [0%]Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface.Touch down not aligned with the runway - let's point down the runway.Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement...Flight Score:119.04 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: [*]Steep banking - save your aerobatic flying for some other time. [*]Wings not level near ground - danger of clipping a wing. [*]Poorly coordinated turns - use your rudder correctly. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManuelL 71 Posted August 30, 2011 Author Share Posted August 30, 2011 Second leg. The landing was much better, but I still got a very low score (have a screenshot of the approach and touch down (replay)). I will try re-building the runway data base before the next flights. Manuel RTWC piloting RealAir Beech Duke N1873K Winglets Ventral ended Monday, August 29, 2011 at 13:49 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 49.71 Miles Wind: 10 Knots Aircraft: Beech ID: N1873K Airline: Flight: Flight plan: IKO TO PAAK : NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 09 Mins 50 Secs Landing Score:28.35 Landing was successful in the following areas:Gentle touchdown. [230 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [72 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [648 feet]Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems:Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [10%]Poor alignment with runway on visual approach - line up and stay there. [0%]Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. Definite room for improvement... Not sure if the reason for the low score was that I still had the Nav set to GPS - so the localizer was active (?) on final - FSFS kept telling me that I am too high re-play of the touch down. Not perfect, but not off the runway either Flight Score:114.93 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns. [*]Nice banking. [*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds. [*]Gear deployment at safe speed. [*]Comfortable G forces. [*]Smooth pitch control. [*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. [*]Gentle taxi turns. [*]Good take off steering. [*]Rotation was not late. [*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. [*]Safe taxi speed. [*]Smooth braking during taxi. [*]Smooth climb during takeoff. [*]Wings level near ground. [*]Well coordinated turns. [*]No stalls. [*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed. [*]Smooth comfortable descent rate. [*]Pitch not too high. [*]Pitch not too low. [*]Flaps down on time. [*]Approach speed not too fast. [*]Low altitude speeds not too fast. [*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManuelL 71 Posted September 11, 2011 Author Share Posted September 11, 2011 Manuel RTWC piloting Douglas DC3PWk ended Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 13:55 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 8.70 Miles Wind: 17 Knots Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: PAAK TO PADK Adak I:Adak NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 49 Mins 09 Secs Landing Score:88.34 Landing was successful in the following areas:Gentle touchdown. [187 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [68 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [701 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems:Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [10%]Poor alignment with runway on visual approach - line up and stay there. [30%] Definite room for improvement...Flight Score:121.99 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: [*]Exceeding flap speeds - your flaps may be damaged: have them checked. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManuelL 71 Posted September 11, 2011 Author Share Posted September 11, 2011 4 Legs done, quite a bit behind schedule for this phase. Manuel RTWC piloting RealAir Beech Duke N1873K Winglets Ventral ended Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 17:04 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 7.46 Miles Wind: 16 Knots Aircraft: Beech ID: N1873K Airline: Flight: Flight plan: PADK TO ATU Attu:Casco Cove CGS NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 54 Mins 33 Secs Landing Score:111.25 Landing was successful in the following areas:Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [90%]Gentle touchdown. [315 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [72 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [662 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing.Nicely handled crosswind. A splendid landing!Flight Score:111.62 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: [*]Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManuelL 71 Posted September 30, 2011 Author Share Posted September 30, 2011 Manuel RTWC piloting F1_Pilatus_PC-12 exec2 ended Saturday, September 17, 2011 at 11:45 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 32.93 Miles Wind: 4 Knots Aircraft: PILATUS ID: HB-FPA Airline: Flight: Flight plan: ATU TO UHPP Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky:Yelizovo NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:03 Hours 01 Mins 58 Secs Landing Score:93.90 Landing was successful in the following areas:Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [223 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [60 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [978 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle. Landing included the following problems:Ballooning during landing - needs practice.Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement...Flight Score:129.11 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight!Manuel RTWC piloting F1_Cessna_Mustang4 ended Saturday, September 17, 2011 at 15:05 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 42.87 Miles Wind: 4 Knots Aircraft: Citation ID: Airline: Flight: 6041 Flight plan: UHPP TO UHSS Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk:Khomutovo NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:03 Hours 08 Mins 27 SecsLanding Score:99.54 Landing was successful in the following areas:Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [148 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [69 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [752 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.With spoilers armed.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems:Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement...Flight Score:129.65 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight!Manuel RTWC piloting Douglas DC3PW ended Saturday, September 24, 2011 at 16:33 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 62.14 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: UHSS TO RJCR Rebun:Rebun NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 56 Mins 57 SecsLanding Score:118.54 Landing was successful in the following areas:Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [90%]Gentle touchdown. [85 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [68 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [339 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. A splendid landing!Flight Score:130.46 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight!Manuel RTWC piloting F1_Pilatus_PC-12 exec2 ended Saturday, September 24, 2011 at 19:03 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 49.71 Miles Wind: 10 Knots Aircraft: PILATUS ID: HB-FPA Airline: Flight: Flight plan: RJCR TO RJAH Hyakuri:Hyakuri Aero NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:02 Hours 17 Mins 36 SecsLanding Score:109.10 Landing was successful in the following areas:Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [90%]Gentle touchdown. [151 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [59 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [410 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Nicely handled crosswind. Landing included the following problems:Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%]Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement...Flight Score:126.45 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Manuel RTWC piloting F1_Pilatus_PC-12 exec2 ended Sunday, September 25, 2011 at 14:26 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 24.85 Miles Wind: 1 Knots Aircraft: PILATUS ID: HB-FPA Airline: Flight: Flight plan: RJAH TO RJBH Hiroshimanishi:Hiroshimanishi NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:02 Hours 02 Mins 19 Secs Landing Score:111.29 Landing was successful in the following areas: [*]Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] [*]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [90%] [*]Gentle touchdown. [89 FPM] [*]Good landing speed - not too fast. [62 KIAS] [*]Wings were level. [*]Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [581 feet] [*]Landed on runway surface. [*]Glideslope held until flare. [*]Good pitch control after touchdown. [*]Good pitch at landing. [*]With flaps - good job. [*]Heading aligned with runway. [*]Throttle(s) idle. [*]Good controlled final descent to touchdown. [*]Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:125.53 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns. [*]Nice banking. [*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds. [*]Gear deployment at safe speed. [*]Comfortable G forces. [*]Smooth pitch control. [*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. [*]Gentle taxi turns. [*]Good take off steering. [*]Rotation was not late. [*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. [*]Safe taxi speed. [*]Smooth braking during taxi. [*]Smooth climb during takeoff. [*]Wings level near ground. [*]Well coordinated turns. [*]No stalls. [*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed. [*]Smooth comfortable descent rate. [*]Pitch not too high. [*]Pitch not too low. [*]Flaps down on time. [*]Approach speed not too fast. [*]Low altitude speeds not too fast. [*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Manuel RTWC piloting F1_Cessna_Mustang4 ended Sunday, September 25, 2011 at 16:47 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 35.42 Miles Wind: 4 Knots Aircraft: Citation ID: Airline: Flight: 6041 Flight plan: RJBH TO ROTM Okinawa I:Futenma MCAS NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:02 Hours 07 Mins 40 Secs Landing Score:94.84 Landing was successful in the following areas: [*]Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] [*]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [80%] [*]Gentle touchdown. [315 FPM] [*]Good landing speed - not too fast. [72 KIAS] [*]Wings were level. [*]Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [483 feet] [*]Landed on runway surface. [*]Glideslope held until flare. [*]Good pitch control after touchdown. [*]Good pitch at landing. [*]With flaps - good job. [*]With spoilers armed. [*]Heading aligned with runway. [*]Throttle(s) idle. [*]Good controlled final descent to touchdown. [*]Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:126.00 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns. [*]Nice banking. [*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds. [*]Gear deployment at safe speed. [*]Comfortable G forces. [*]Smooth pitch control. [*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. [*]Gentle taxi turns. [*]Good take off steering. [*]Rotation was not late. [*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. [*]Safe taxi speed. [*]Smooth braking during taxi. [*]Smooth climb during takeoff. [*]Wings level near ground. [*]Well coordinated turns. [*]No stalls. [*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed. [*]Smooth comfortable descent rate. [*]Pitch not too high. [*]Pitch not too low. [*]Flaps down on time. [*]Approach speed not too fast. [*]Low altitude speeds not too fast. [*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Manuel RTWC piloting RealAir Beech Duke DIESG Winglets ended Wednesday, September 28, 2011 at 19:58 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 37.28 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Beech ID: DIESG Airline: Flight: Flight plan: ROTM TO RCYU Hualien:Hualien NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 47 Mins 41 Secs Landing Score:89.75 Landing was successful in the following areas: [*]Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] [*]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] [*]Gentle touchdown. [210 FPM] [*]Good landing speed - not too fast. [82 KIAS] [*]Wings were level. [*]Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [953 feet] [*]Landed on runway surface. [*]Glideslope held until flare. [*]Good pitch control after touchdown. [*]Good pitch at landing. [*]With flaps - good job. [*]Heading aligned with runway. [*]Throttle(s) idle. [*]Good controlled final descent to touchdown. [*]Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:117.21 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns. [*]Nice banking. [*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds. [*]Gear deployment at safe speed. [*]Comfortable G forces. [*]Smooth pitch control. [*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. [*]Gentle taxi turns. [*]Good take off steering. [*]Rotation was not late. [*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. [*]Safe taxi speed. [*]Smooth braking during taxi. [*]Smooth climb during takeoff. [*]Wings level near ground. [*]Well coordinated turns. [*]No stalls. [*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed. [*]Smooth comfortable descent rate. [*]Pitch not too high. [*]Pitch not too low. [*]Flaps down on time. [*]Approach speed not too fast. [*]Low altitude speeds not too fast. [*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Manuel RTWC piloting F1_Cessna_Mustang4 ended Friday, September 30, 2011 at 18:56 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 19.26 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Citation ID: Airline: Flight: 6041 Flight plan: NAV1: HCN AIRCRAFT CRASHED National Aeronautical Safety Board Findings: [*]Vertical Speed: -3793 fpm [*]AGL: 0 feet [*]Bank: 1 degrees [*]Ground Speed: 270 kts [*]IAS: 273 kts [*]Pitch: -8 degrees [*]COM1: Standard [*]Transponder: Visual flight rules [*]Gear: Up [*]AutoPilot: Off [*]Visibility: 19 nm [*]Eng1: Running [*]Eng2: Running [*]Airborne immediately prior to crash Flight Score:0.00 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds. [*]Gear deployment at safe speed. [*]Comfortable G forces. [*]Smooth pitch control. [*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. [*]Gentle taxi turns. [*]Good take off steering. [*]Rotation was not late. [*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. [*]Safe taxi speed. [*]Smooth braking during taxi. [*]Smooth climb during takeoff. [*]Wings level near ground. [*]Well coordinated turns. [*]No stalls. [*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed. [*]Pitch not too high. [*]Flaps down on time. [*]Approach speed not too fast. [*]Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: [*]Rough turns - your passengers spilt their drinks and have a pain in their necks. [*]Steep banking - save your aerobatic flying for some other time. [*]Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable. [*]Nose held too low - we're not in combat. [*]Excessive speed at low altitude - several complaints have been filed. [*]Poorly trimmed aircraft - trimmers are there to help: use them. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts