Tyrion 72 Posted June 13, 2011 Share Posted June 13, 2011 My scores spreadsheet. In yellow: the landing score which I really hate, though I don't understand why it's that low. In red, an 'off runway' score, although I landed on the runway. Both scores should normally be well above 100, as the first was done with a 737 and the second with a C130. I guess FSFS is the boss... Lars Domen piloting RealAir Beech Duke DIESG Winglets ended 13 June, 2011 at 13:11 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 62.14 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Beech ID: DIESG Airline: Flight: Flight plan: 2B2 TO KBUF Buffalo:Buffalo Niagara Intl NAV1: IBNQ Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:02 Hours 01 Mins 06 Secs Landing Score:98.25 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on ILS approach. [90%]Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [90%]Gentle touchdown. [125 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [83 KIAS]Wings were level.Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. A splendid landing!Flight Score:115.01 Flight commended in the following areas:Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: [*]Rough turns - your passengers spilt their drinks and have a pain in their necks. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 Lars Domen piloting CS CS_C130 2 ended 19 June, 2011 at 15:10 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 62.14 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Hercules ID: CH-07 Airline: BAC Flight: 07 Flight plan: KBUF TO 06C Chicago-Schaumburg:Schaumburg Regl NAV1: PMM Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 26 Mins 49 Secs Landing Score:131.09 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on visual approach. [60%]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [210 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [95 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [812 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. A splendid landing!Flight Score:126.80 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: [*]Exceeding flap speeds - your flaps may be damaged: have them checked.[*]Dangerous stalls - don't let that happen again.[*]Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 9, 2011 Author Share Posted July 9, 2011 having problems continuing the RTWC here. I've started the third flight several times now, but haven't been able to finish. I've tried to fly it 3 times now, and all 3 times I flew more than 1.5 hours, but also all 3 times, FSX crashed after that. I'll try to finish it anyway, but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 Lars Domen piloting Boeing_737_900ER_FSX_Alaskan ended 17 July, 2011 at 13:47 Aircraft: BOEING AIRCRAFT ID: N737 Airline: Alaskan Flight: 332 Flight plan: 06C TO KASE Aspen:Aspen-Pitkin Co-Sardy NAV1: IASE Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:02 Hours 28 Mins 15 Secs Landing Score:137.05 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [70%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [112 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [112 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1068 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:155.54 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 Managed to get another flight done today. Not really pleased with the scores though. Especially on landing. I was dead center on the centerline from 6 miles out, yet Smith was always complaining: "let's get on the centerline". Same with the glideslope. 2 reds, 2 whites on the PAPI from 4 miles out, yet Smith didn't think that was good enough. Well, anyway, flight's done, and the scores aren't that bad... just not good for my averages. Lars Domen piloting RealAir Beech Duke DIESG Winglets ended 17 July, 2011 at 17:06 Aircraft: Beech ID: DIESG Airline: Flight: Flight plan: KASE TO KBTF Bountiful:Skypark NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 21 Mins 48 Secs Landing Score:84.34 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [70%] * Gentle touchdown. [164 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [74 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1479 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: * Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%] Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:114.65 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Late rotation - when Vr is reached - take off. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 20, 2011 Author Share Posted July 20, 2011 Lars Domen piloting CS CS_C130 2 ended 20 July, 2011 at 14:24 Aircraft: Hercules ID: CH-07 Airline: BAC Flight: 07 Flight plan: KBTF TO KLAS Las Vegas:McCarran Intl NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 06 Mins 58 Secs Landing Score:124.54 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [70%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [80%] * Gentle touchdown. [341 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [101 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [779 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:140.61 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Exceeding flap speeds - your flaps may be damaged: have them checked. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 22, 2011 Author Share Posted July 22, 2011 Not my best flight... particularly the landing score is lower than I'd wish, but hey, better next time I hope... Lars Domen piloting CS CS_C130 2 ended 21 July, 2011 at 11:57 Aircraft: Hercules ID: CH-07 Airline: BAC Flight: 07 Flight plan: KLAS TO A34 Dayton-Carson City:Dayton Valley NAV1: PYE Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 27 Mins 18 Secs Landing Score:105.04 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [331 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [94 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Landed on runway surface. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job.£ * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: * Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%] * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [-515 feet] (short) * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:143.83 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 22, 2011 Author Share Posted July 22, 2011 Quite a good flight, with good scores for the DC-3. Lars Domen piloting Douglas DC-3 United ended 22 July, 2011 at 16:14 Aircraft: Douglas ID: Airline: Flight: £ Flight plan: A34 TO KHWD Hayward:Hayward Executive NAV1: PYE Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 02 Mins 03 Secs Landing Score:125.95 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [80%] * Gentle touchdown. [16 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [72 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1543 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:131.27 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 24, 2011 Author Share Posted July 24, 2011 Lars Domen piloting RealAir Beech Duke DIESG Winglets ended 24 July, 2011 at 14:39 Aircraft: Beech ID: DIESG Airline: Flight: Flight plan: KHWD TO KLMT Klamath Falls:Klamath Falls NAV1: ILMT Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 24 Mins 52 Secs Landing Score:95.04 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on ILS approach. [90%] * Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [157 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [75 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:118.84 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 27, 2011 Author Share Posted July 27, 2011 Lars Domen piloting Boeing_737_900ER_FSX_Alaskan ended 24 July, 2011 at 20:40 Aircraft: BOEING AIRCRAFT ID: N737 Airline: Alaskan Flight: 332 Flight plan: KLMT TO KSEA Seattle:Seattle-Tacoma Intl NAV1: ISEA Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 51 Mins 59 Secs Landing Score:120.95 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on ILS approach. [50%] * Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [90%] * Gentle touchdown. [394 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [121 KIAS] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: * Wings not level - danger of clipping the ground or damaging your gear. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:145.76 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. Flight included the following problems: * Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable. * Narrowly missed obstacles - plan your safety altitudes. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 27, 2011 Author Share Posted July 27, 2011 Smith keeps giving me bad marks about my glideslope, although I'm always quite good according to the VASI or PAPI lights along the runway... don't really understand it... Lars Domen piloting RealAir Beech Duke DIESG Winglets ended 26 July, 2011 at 16:36 Aircraft: Beech ID: DIESG Airline: Flight: Flight plan: KSEA TO CYZT Port Hardy:Port Hardy NAV1: YZT Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 33 Mins 54 Secs Landing Score:84.65 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [161 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [81 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1027 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: * Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%] Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:113.38 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Flaps not down on time - plan your landing next time. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 27, 2011 Author Share Posted July 27, 2011 This one got me really, really ####ed... the landing score, I mean. The flight was picture-perfect, nothing to improve on. As was, in my opinion the landing. The glideslope was indeed not the best, but I kept the VASI lights in check the entire final, so I really don't understand why I'm only getting 40% Same with the 'on centerline' remark: I didn't deviate the slightest bit, so I'm really wondering about that one. And then there's that terrible score... Only 50'ish points, with just those 2 remarks?? Can't grasp it with my mind... I'm not happy here... should be scoring well above 100 in the 737, even with those remarks. Lars Domen piloting Boeing_737_900ER_FSX_Alaskan ended 27 July, 2011 at 14:28 Aircraft: BOEING AIRCRAFT ID: N737 Airline: Alaskan Flight: 332 Flight plan: CYZT TO PAWG Wrangell:Wrangell NAV1: YZP Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 12 Mins 24 Secs Landing Score:56.79 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [584 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [112 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [781 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%] * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:155.99 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingsub 7 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Lars, I sympathise. That Mr Whittle is always complaining.. "you're above the glide slope, you're below the glide slope" (even though you have the PAPI lights just right) "you have damaged your flaps" (even though you never exceeded the speeds that you inputted at the start), etc etc and he keeps asking "Whats that smell"...IT'S HIM,he stinks!) .........and as for his scoring, don't get me started Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 29, 2011 Author Share Posted July 29, 2011 I know the scores aren't that bad, but I'm getting tired of these uncorrect remarks upon landing. There was hardly anything to improve on upon landing, and certainly the 'runway centerline' remark is just wrong. Anyway... Lars Domen piloting Douglas DC-3 United ended 29 July, 2011 at 11:54 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 62.14 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Douglas ID: Airline: Flight: Flight plan: PAWG TO PASI Sitka:Sitka Rocky Gutierrez NAV1: ISIT Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 55 Mins 11 Secs Landing Score:109.25 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [43 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [76 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1397 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems:Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%]Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:130.86 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns.[*]Nice banking.[*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds.[*]Gear deployment at safe speed.[*]Comfortable G forces.[*]Smooth pitch control.[*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.[*]Gentle taxi turns.[*]Good take off steering.[*]Rotation was not late.[*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.[*]Safe taxi speed.[*]Smooth braking during taxi.[*]Smooth climb during takeoff.[*]Wings level near ground.[*]Well coordinated turns.[*]No stalls.[*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed.[*]Smooth comfortable descent rate.[*]Pitch not too high.[*]Pitch not too low.[*]Flaps down on time.[*]Approach speed not too fast.[*]Low altitude speeds not too fast.[*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 29, 2011 Author Share Posted July 29, 2011 And there it is once again! Getting really, really tired now... I have a couple of screenshots from the approach this time: lined up 7 miles out, on the VASI from 4 miles out, and not deviated the slightest bit. Also have screenshots from the rollout: no problem following the centerline! Again, the points aren't that bad, but those stupid, stupid remarks... Two flights to go, should be finished by Sunday... Just hoping FSFS stops making stupid remarks. I know full well myself when I screw up a landing... This one was as good as it gets... Lars Domen piloting Douglas DC-3 United ended 29 July, 2011 at 14:22 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 62.14 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Douglas ID: Airline: Flight: Flight plan: PASI TO PAYA Yakutat:Yakutat NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 20 Mins 35 Secs Landing Score:103.04 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [80%]Gentle touchdown. [105 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [83 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1168 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems:Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%]Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:132.38 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns.[*]Nice banking.[*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds.[*]Gear deployment at safe speed.[*]Comfortable G forces.[*]Smooth pitch control.[*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.[*]Gentle taxi turns.[*]Good take off steering.[*]Rotation was not late.[*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.[*]Safe taxi speed.[*]Smooth braking during taxi.[*]Smooth climb during takeoff.[*]Wings level near ground.[*]Well coordinated turns.[*]No stalls.[*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed.[*]Smooth comfortable descent rate.[*]Pitch not too high.[*]Pitch not too low.[*]Flaps down on time.[*]Approach speed not too fast.[*]Low altitude speeds not too fast.[*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 Hi Lars, I stopped listening to the landing remarks of stupid Mr.Smith. Now, I just do it my way, and the scores have improved dramatically! Hope it helps... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 Hahaha, Smith keeps making up remarks: narrowly missed obstacles... LMAO... the entire flight (and especially the approach) was over water... Lars Domen piloting Boeing_737_900ER_FSX_Alaskan ended 30 July, 2011 at 17:10 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 62.14 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: BOEING AIRCRAFT ID: N737 Airline: Alaskan Flight: 332 Flight plan: PAYA TO PADQ Kodiak:Kodiak NAV1: IADQ Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 16 Mins 29 Secs Landing Score:136.69 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on ILS approach. [100%]Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [279 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [118 KIAS]Wings were level.Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.With spoilers armed.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. A splendid landing!Flight Score:150.23 Flight commended in the following areas:Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast. Flight included the following problems: [*]Narrowly missed obstacles - plan your safety altitudes. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 And now he's saying again: 'Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface.' Now, if he's making this remark because of the off runway part, he's just wrong. If he's making it because of the approach, well, he's again wrong lol... terrible score though... but I have screenshots of the final approach and the rollout, so I can prove neither points are valid. Shame, cause even if the 50 points are added, the score is still bad. Should be around 125 in the C-130... Anyway, phase 2 finished... still not liking FSFS, though I have become a better virtual-pilot because of it. here's the log from the final flight, screenshots coming soon. Lars Domen piloting CS CS_C130 2 ended 30 July, 2011 at 21:22 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (April 27 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 62.14 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Hercules ID: CH-07 Airline: BAC Flight: 07 Flight plan: PADQ TO PADU Unalaska:Unalaska NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 52 Mins 45 Secs Landing Score:31.29 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [374 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [97 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [318 feet]Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems:Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:148.36 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns.[*]Nice banking.[*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds.[*]Gear deployment at safe speed.[*]Comfortable G forces.[*]Smooth pitch control.[*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.[*]Gentle taxi turns.[*]Good take off steering.[*]Rotation was not late.[*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.[*]Safe taxi speed.[*]Smooth braking during taxi.[*]Smooth climb during takeoff.[*]Wings level near ground.[*]Well coordinated turns.[*]No stalls.[*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed.[*]Smooth comfortable descent rate.[*]Pitch not too high.[*]Pitch not too low.[*]Flaps down on time.[*]Approach speed not too fast.[*]Low altitude speeds not too fast.[*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion 72 Posted August 3, 2011 Author Share Posted August 3, 2011 added scores spreadsheet in first post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingsub 7 Posted August 3, 2011 Share Posted August 3, 2011 At least you have reached the end, I'm still stuck in Klamath Falls trying to keep my PC from crashing whilst I'm trying to capture the ILS at KSEA (it did it on finals twice last night). I'll crash-land if I have to finish that way, it can't make my landing scores any worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts