gmoreira 29 Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 21, 2011 Author Share Posted April 21, 2011 Gonçalo Moreira piloting PMDG Jetstream 41 Qantas Link ended 09 April 2011 at 20:14 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 19.88 Miles Wind: 10 Knots Aircraft: BAe ID: VH-NXA Airline: Air Link Flight: 4887 Flight plan: TO LFPO Paris:Orly NAV1: ORE Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 36 Mins 23 Secs Landing Score:59.50 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on ILS approach. [60%]Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [90%]Gentle touchdown. [75 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [100 KIAS]Wings were level.Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: Not near the centre line - you can do better.Without spoilers armed - arm them before landing.Flight Score:115.13 Flight commended in the following areas: Smooth turns.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Good take off steering.Rotation was not late.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: Steep banking - save your aerobatic flying for some other time.Exceeding flap speeds - your flaps may be damaged: have them checked.Dangerous taxiing turns - these cause discomfort and stress.Flaps down while taxiing - get them up.Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable.Gonçalo Moreira piloting Carenado BARON B58 METAL BLUE ended 10 April 2011 at 17:40 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 19.88 Miles Wind: 10 Knots Aircraft: BEECH ID: VH-HMU Airline: Flight: Flight plan: TO EGLC London:London City NAV1: ILSR Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 27 Mins 58 SecsLanding Score:89.95 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on ILS approach. [70%]Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [108 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [74 KIAS]Wings were level.Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: Not near the centre line - you can do better.Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line.Flight Score:109.28 Flight commended in the following areas: Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: Poor steering during takeoff - stay in the centre of the runway.Gonçalo Moreira piloting Carenado BARON B58 METAL BLUE ended 10 April 2011 at 19:56 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 19.88 Miles Wind: 10 Knots Aircraft: BEECH ID: VH-HMU Airline: Flight: Flight plan: TO ELLX Luxembourg:Luxembourg NAV1: ILW Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:02 Hours 16 Mins 05 SecsLanding Score:82.65 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on ILS approach. [80%]Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [367 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [69 KIAS]Wings were level.Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown.Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: Not near the centre line - you can do better.Flight Score:108.93 Flight commended in the following areas: Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Rotation was not late.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too high.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: Steep banking - save your aerobatic flying for some other time.Narrowly missed obstacles - plan your safety altitudes.Gonçalo Moreira piloting Douglas DC3PWU ended 11 April 2011 at 21:35 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 19.88 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: TO EHLE Lelystad:Lelystad NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 17 Mins 06 SecsLanding Score:123.45 Landing was successful in the following areas: Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%]Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%]Gentle touchdown. [108 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [74 KIAS]Wings were level.Gentle touchdown. [40 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [67 KIAS]Wings were level.Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [482 feet]Landed on runway surface.Glideslope held until flare.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown. A splendid landing! Flight Score:130.89 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns.[*]Nice banking.[*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds.[*]Gear deployment at safe speed.[*]Comfortable G forces.[*]Smooth pitch control.[*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.[*]Gentle taxi turns.[*]Good take off steering.[*]Rotation was not late.[*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.[*]Safe taxi speed.[*]Smooth braking during taxi.[*]Smooth climb during takeoff.[*]Wings level near ground.[*]Well coordinated turns.[*]No stalls.[*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed.[*]Smooth comfortable descent rate.[*]Pitch not too high.[*]Pitch not too low.[*]Flaps down on time.[*]Approach speed not too fast.[*]Low altitude speeds not too fast.[*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Gonçalo Moreira piloting PMDG Jetstream 41 Qantas Link ended 17 April 2011 at 23:57 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 27.96 Miles Wind: 1 Knots Aircraft: BAe ID: VH-NXA Airline: Air Link Flight: 4887 Flight plan: TO EDDT Berlin:Tegel NAV1: ITLW Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 16 Mins 41 Secs Landing Score:110.54 Landing was successful in the following areas: [*]Good glideslope on ILS approach. [80%][*]Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [100%][*]Gentle touchdown. [148 FPM][*]Good landing speed - not too fast. [106 KIAS][*]Wings were level.[*]Landed on runway surface.[*]Glideslope held until flare.[*]Good pitch control after touchdown.[*]Good pitch at landing.[*]With flaps - good job.[*]Heading aligned with runway.[*]Throttle(s) idle.[*]Good controlled final descent to touchdown.[*]Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: [*]Without spoilers armed - arm them before landing.Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:132.95 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns.[*]Nice banking.[*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds.[*]Gear deployment at safe speed.[*]Comfortable G forces.[*]Smooth pitch control.[*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.[*]Gentle taxi turns.[*]Good take off steering.[*]Rotation was not late.[*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.[*]Safe taxi speed.[*]Smooth braking during taxi.[*]Smooth climb during takeoff.[*]Wings level near ground.[*]Well coordinated turns.[*]No stalls.[*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed.[*]Smooth comfortable descent rate.[*]Pitch not too high.[*]Pitch not too low.[*]Flaps down on time.[*]Approach speed not too fast.[*]Low altitude speeds not too fast.[*]Good clearance of obstacles. A smooth flight! Gonçalo Moreira piloting PMDG Jetstream 41 Qantas Link ended 18 April 2011 at 21:39 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 49.09 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: BAe ID: VH-NXA Airline: Air Link Flight: 4887 Flight plan: TO ENGM Oslo:Gardermoen NAV1: OBW Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 52 Mins 45 Secs Landing Score:119.44 Landing was successful in the following areas: [*]Good glideslope on ILS approach. [70%][*]Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [100%][*]Gentle touchdown. [89 FPM][*]Good landing speed - not too fast. [102 KIAS][*]Wings were level.[*]Landed on runway surface.[*]Glideslope held until flare.[*]Good pitch control after touchdown.[*]Good pitch at landing.[*]With flaps - good job.[*]Heading aligned with runway.[*]Throttle(s) idle.[*]Good controlled final descent to touchdown.[*]Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:121.11 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns.[*]Nice banking.[*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds.[*]Gear deployment at safe speed.[*]Comfortable G forces.[*]Smooth pitch control.[*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.[*]Good take off steering.[*]Safe taxi speed.[*]Smooth braking during taxi.[*]Smooth climb during takeoff.[*]Wings level near ground.[*]Well coordinated turns.[*]No stalls.[*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed.[*]Smooth comfortable descent rate.[*]Pitch not too low.[*]Flaps down on time.[*]Approach speed not too fast.[*]Low altitude speeds not too fast.[*]Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: [*]Dangerous taxiing turns - these cause discomfort and stress.[*]Late rotation - when Vr is reached - take off.[*]Flaps down while taxiing - get them up.[*]Nose held too high - spilt drinks and worried expressions.Definite room for improvement... Gonçalo Moreira piloting Feelthere A320 CFM TAP Portugal ended 21 April 2011 at 18:08 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 38.53 Miles Wind: 11 Knots Aircraft: AIRBUS ID: CS-TNJ Airline: TAP Portugal Flight: 320 Flight plan: NAV1: MF Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 27 Mins 08 Secs Landing Score:34.20 Landing was successful in the following areas: [*]Gentle touchdown. [-23 FPM][*]Good landing speed - not too fast. [132 KIAS][*]Wings were level.[*]Good pitch control after touchdown.[*]Good pitch at landing.[*]With flaps - good job.[*]With spoilers armed.[*]Heading aligned with runway.[*]Throttle(s) idle.[*]Good controlled final descent to touchdown.[*]Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: [*]No glideslope information was available on visual approach.[*]No runway alignment information was available on visual approach.[*]Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface.[*]No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope.[*]Nowhere near the centre line - get lined up and keep it that way.Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:142.82 Flight commended in the following areas: [*]Smooth turns.[*]Nice banking.[*]Correct matching of flaps to speeds.[*]Gear deployment at safe speed.[*]Comfortable G forces.[*]Smooth pitch control.[*]Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.[*]Good take off steering.[*]Rotation was not late.[*]Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.[*]Safe taxi speed.[*]Smooth braking during taxi.[*]Smooth climb during takeoff.[*]Wings level near ground.[*]Well coordinated turns.[*]No stalls.[*]No flying dangerously close to stall speed.[*]Smooth comfortable descent rate.[*]Pitch not too high.[*]Pitch not too low.[*]Flaps down on time.[*]Approach speed not too fast.[*]Low altitude speeds not too fast.[*]Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: Dangerous taxiing turns - these cause discomfort and stress.Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 21, 2011 Author Share Posted April 21, 2011 Gonçalo Moreira piloting Carenado BARON B58 METAL BLUE ended 21 April 2011 at 20:39 Aircraft: BEECH ID: VH-HMU Airline: Flight: Flight plan: NAV1: IES Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 34 Mins 27 Secs Landing Score:18.87 Autopilot used. Landing was successful in the following areas: * Gentle touchdown. [279 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [77 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * No glideslope information was available on visual approach. * No runway alignment information was available on visual approach. * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:72.87 Autopilot used. Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable. Definite room for improvement... This is frustrating. Autopilot was turned on after selecting cruise and off before landing mode, respecting the 1000 ft AGL rule. I dont understand the bad rating on landing. For the procedure I was supposed to have the NAV1 tuned to IES (ILS for rwy 4), to get DME readings for an NDB/DME RWY22 approach. I corrected the OBS to the correct QFU of the runway I was landing at, made a fine approach and landing and yet the worst landing score I ever got. :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 21, 2011 Author Share Posted April 21, 2011 Another gruesome flight... :excl: Gonçalo Moreira piloting Carenado BARON B58 METAL BLUE ended 21 April 2011 at 22:10 Aircraft: BEECH ID: VH-HMU Airline: Flight: Flight plan: NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 11 Mins 33 Secs Landing Score:27.35 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Gentle touchdown. [223 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [52 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * No glideslope information was available on visual approach. * No runway alignment information was available on visual approach. * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. * Touch down not aligned with the runway - let's point down the runway. * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:83.04 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Pitch not too high. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Sickening G forces - your passengers feel rather unwell. * Poor steering during takeoff - stay in the centre of the runway. * Poorly coordinated turns - use your rudder correctly. * Dangerous stalls - don't let that happen again. * Rapid descent - dangerous and uncomfortable. * Nose held too low - we're not in combat. * Excessive speed at low altitude - several complaints have been filed. Definite room for improvement... Well, the thing with it not knowing which runway I'm landing at is really a pain in the neck. As for the rest, it was my fault, or even better, the weather's... Jesus! BIVM 211800Z 13029G40KT 100V000 8000 SCT010 OVC025 08/05 Q0997 RMK MISVINDA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 22, 2011 Author Share Posted April 22, 2011 Iceland is beatiful, but REALLY FRUSTRATING WITH FSFS! :angry: Gonçalo Moreira piloting Douglas DC3PWU ended 22 April 2011 at 13:30 Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 00 Mins 13 Secs Landing Score:27.64 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Gentle touchdown. [161 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [72 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * No glideslope information was available on visual approach. * No runway alignment information was available on visual approach. * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. * Touch down not aligned with the runway - let's point down the runway. * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:113.66 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Loss of altitude during takeoff - climb smoothly. * Wings not level near ground - danger of clipping a wing. * Poorly coordinated turns - use your rudder correctly. * Nose held too high - spilt drinks and worried expressions. * Nose held too low - we're not in combat. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 22, 2011 Author Share Posted April 22, 2011 And once again.... :angry: :excl: Gonçalo Moreira piloting Douglas DC3PWU ended 22 April 2011 at 14:50 Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 04 Mins 04 Secs Landing Score:27.39 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Gentle touchdown. [259 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [67 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * No glideslope information was available on visual approach. * No runway alignment information was available on visual approach. * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. * Touch down not aligned with the runway - let's point down the runway. * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:115.89 Flight commended in the following areas: * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Rough turns - your passengers spilt their drinks and have a pain in their necks. * Steep banking - save your aerobatic flying for some other time. * Poorly coordinated turns - use your rudder correctly. * Nose held too high - spilt drinks and worried expressions. * Nose held too low - we're not in combat. Definite room for improvement... Don't understand it! Dead on the centre of the runway, nice stable approach... Well, you should be able to hold your stomach if you're flying at these Latitudes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 25, 2011 Author Share Posted April 25, 2011 One more flight, and the next leg is outta Iceland. I must say Iceland X is fabulous, and will be sorely missed for the time being. What won't be missed is that ridiculous OFF the runway. :excl: At least this time Mr. Smith held his stomach! Gonçalo Moreira piloting Douglas DC3PWU ended 25 April 2011 at 21:21 FSFlyingSchool 2011 (Jan 21 2011) Using: FSX Visibility: 45.36 Miles Wind: 0 Knots Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 28 Mins 36 Secs Landing Score:27.25 Landing was successful in the following areas: Gentle touchdown. [69 FPM]Good landing speed - not too fast. [64 KIAS]Wings were level.Good pitch control after touchdown.Good pitch at landing.With flaps - good job.Heading aligned with runway.Throttle(s) idle.Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: No glideslope information was available on visual approach.No runway alignment information was available on visual approach.Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface.No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope.Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line.Flight Score:120.76 Flight commended in the following areas: Smooth turns.Nice banking.Correct matching of flaps to speeds.Gear deployment at safe speed.Comfortable G forces.Smooth pitch control.Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit.Gentle taxi turns.Good take off steering.Appropriate position of flaps during taxi.Safe taxi speed.Smooth braking during taxi.Smooth climb during takeoff.Wings level near ground.Well coordinated turns.No stalls.No flying dangerously close to stall speed.Smooth comfortable descent rate.Pitch not too low.Flaps down on time.Approach speed not too fast.Low altitude speeds not too fast.Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: Late rotation - when Vr is reached - take off.Nose held too high - spilt drinks and worried expressions.Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 26, 2011 Author Share Posted April 26, 2011 Gonçalo Moreira piloting Feelthere A320 CFM TAP Portugal ended 26 April 2011 at 22:26 Aircraft: AIRBUS ID: CS-TNJ Airline: TAP Portugal Flight: 320 Flight plan: NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 40 Mins 25 Secs Landing Score:33.75 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Gentle touchdown. [75 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [123 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: * No glideslope information was available on visual approach. * No runway alignment information was available on visual approach. * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. * Throttle(s) forward - should be idle. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:141.62 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Exceeding flap speeds - your flaps may be damaged: have them checked. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManuelL 71 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Hi, just looked at your table. Kudos for planning to land on Plum Island with a Jetstream. Might be the largest plane they have seen there in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 27, 2011 Author Share Posted April 27, 2011 Hi Manuel, I know... It's ridiculous... But I have the faith that i'll be able to nail it! From my studying, i guess the problem would have been to fly it out of 2B2. So, I intend to arrive very lightweight (no pax or cargo), with very low fuel (FAA won't be there right?) and with my nose held up in the air. Moreover, I will use a technique that I learned at Flying school, namely to land at a local airfield (checkout photos of LPIN - Espinho), where you use the WHOLE runway (that meaning the grass before it too!) Since 2B2 has good clearways and hopefully a little headwind, i'm feeling confident! And obviously Mr. Smith will whine and moan, and complain that it was OFF the runway... (but doesn't he do that all the time anyway?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul G 13 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Hi Manuel, I know... It's ridiculous... But I have the faith that i'll be able to nail it! From my studying, i guess the problem would have been to fly it out of 2B2. So, I intend to arrive very lightweight (no pax or cargo), with very low fuel (FAA won't be there right?) and with my nose held up in the air. Moreover, I will use a technique that I learned at Flying school, namely to land at a local airfield (checkout photos of LPIN - Espinho), where you use the WHOLE runway (that meaning the grass before it too!) Since 2B2 has good clearways and hopefully a little headwind, i'm feeling confident! And obviously Mr. Smith will whine and moan, and complain that it was OFF the runway... (but doesn't he do that all the time anyway?) And don't forget to land with the reversers at full and slam the breaks when the wheels hit the ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 27, 2011 Author Share Posted April 27, 2011 And don't forget to land with the reversers at full and slam the breaks when the wheels hit the ground WILCO! And add also the Spoilers and anything that can be sticked out to induce drag or reverse thrust! I'll try to film the feat! I think it deserves... Worst case scenario: zero points and a crash! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 28, 2011 Author Share Posted April 28, 2011 Gonçalo Moreira piloting Feelthere A320 CFM TAP Portugal ended 28 April 2011 at 09:24 Aircraft: AIRBUS ID: CS-TNJ Airline: TAP Portugal Flight: 320 Flight plan: NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 48 Mins 03 Secs Landing Score:33.75 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Gentle touchdown. [-13 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [123 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: * No glideslope information was available on visual approach. * No runway alignment information was available on visual approach. * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:139.08 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Dangerous taxiing turns - these cause discomfort and stress. * Airspeed too low - you are risking stalls. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Share Posted April 29, 2011 Gonçalo Moreira piloting Feelthere A320 CFM TAP Portugal ended 29 April 2011 at 21:10 Aircraft: AIRBUS ID: CS-TNJ Airline: TAP Portugal Flight: 320 Flight plan: TO CYHZ Halifax:Halifax Intl NAV1: IJG Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 40 Mins 18 Secs Landing Score:140.00 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on ILS approach. [80%] * Good alignment with runway on ILS approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [52 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [122 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Flight Score:140.61 Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Appropriate position of flaps during taxi. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Airspeed too low - you are risking stalls. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 30, 2011 Author Share Posted April 30, 2011 Last flight of Part 1. A very lousy score due to an Autopilot screw-up! I forgot to enabre cruise mode before setting the autopilot, even despite being at 9.000ft... The landing score was very poor also, but that has an explanation. I needed a perfectly hard docking in order to get that JS41 stopped on time. I NAILED IT!!!! Video of the feat will be posted on the screenshots post. :) Still got the off runway thing, but it was my fault. I didn't "make runways" after installing the great "Hundred Dollar Burger" addon! Gonçalo Moreira piloting PMDG Jetstream 41 Qantas Link ended 30 April 2011 at 17:52 Aircraft: BAe ID: VH-NXA Airline: Air Link Flight: 4887 Flight plan: TO 2B2 Newburyport:Plum Island NAV1: LEB Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:01 Hours 27 Mins 45 Secs Landing Score:19.86 Autopilot used. Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] * Gentle touchdown. [436 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [95 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [335 feet] * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * Poor alignment with runway on visual approach - line up and stay there. [0%] * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Flight Score:84.22 Autopilot used. Flight commended in the following areas: * Smooth turns. * Nice banking. * Correct matching of flaps to speeds. * Gear deployment at safe speed. * Comfortable G forces. * Smooth pitch control. * Flown within aircraft's maximum speed limit. * Gentle taxi turns. * Good take off steering. * Rotation was not late. * Safe taxi speed. * Smooth braking during taxi. * Smooth climb during takeoff. * Wings level near ground. * Well coordinated turns. * No stalls. * No flying dangerously close to stall speed. * Smooth comfortable descent rate. * Pitch not too high. * Pitch not too low. * Flaps down on time. * Approach speed not too fast. * Low altitude speeds not too fast. * Good clearance of obstacles. Flight included the following problems: * Flaps down while taxiing - get them up. Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManuelL 71 Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Congratulations for completing the first phase. Looks like you are the first one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul G 13 Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Looks like you are the first one Actually I was, last flight of the last leg was April 22nd in the King Air (Check my scores thread.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 30, 2011 Author Share Posted April 30, 2011 Congratulations for completing the first phase. Thank you Manuel! The video link will come soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted April 30, 2011 Author Share Posted April 30, 2011 Aircraft: AIRBUS ID: CS-TNJ Airline: TAP Portugal Flight: 320 Flight plan: TO EKVG Vagar:Vagar NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 15 Mins 05 Secs Landing Score:135.00 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [60%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [90%] * Gentle touchdown. [72 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [122 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [394 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Aircraft: BEECH ID: VH-HMU Airline: Flight: Flight plan: TO BIEG Egilsstadir:Egilsstadir NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 04 Mins 20 Secs Landing Score:47.10 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [489 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [70 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1091 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Aircraft: BEECH ID: VH-HMU Airline: Flight: Flight plan: NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 04 Mins 32 Secs Landing Score:28.35 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Gentle touchdown. [180 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [72 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * No glideslope information was available on visual approach. * No runway alignment information was available on visual approach. * Landed without a proper approach OR off runway surface. * No glideslope - could not compare flare to glideslope. * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: TO BIGR Grimsey:Grimsey NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 03 Mins 55 Secs Landing Score:112.95 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [70%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [141 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [75 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [982 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: TO BITE Thingeyri:Thingeyri NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 04 Mins 58 Secs Landing Score:107.34 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [80%] * Gentle touchdown. [217 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [72 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [541 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. A splendid landing! Aircraft: Douglas ID: DC3 Airline: Flight: Flight plan: TO BIRF Rif:Rif NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 03 Mins 58 Secs Landing Score:103.34 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good glideslope on visual approach. [50%] * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [90%] * Gentle touchdown. [197 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [65 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [224 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. Landing included the following problems: * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Aircraft: AIRBUS ID: CS-TNJ Airline: TAP Portugal Flight: 320 Flight plan: TO BGBW Narsarsuaq:Narsarsuaq NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 03 Mins 51 Secs Landing Score:142.25 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [7 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [120 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1214 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Nicely handled crosswind. Landing included the following problems: * Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [20%] * Poor steering after landing - stay on the centre line. Definite room for improvement... Aircraft: AIRBUS ID: CS-TNJ Airline: TAP Portugal Flight: 320 Flight plan: TO CYYR Goose Bay:Goose Bay NAV1: Failure(s): None at landing Failure Event(s) (Zulu Time): None Failure Bonus:0% Flight Duration:00 Hours 06 Mins 15 Secs Landing Score:130.65 Landing was successful in the following areas: * Good alignment with runway on visual approach. [100%] * Gentle touchdown. [-39 FPM] * Good landing speed - not too fast. [115 KIAS] * Wings were level. * Distance from runway threshold (visual approach): [1751 feet] * Landed on runway surface. * Glideslope held until flare. * Good pitch control after touchdown. * Good pitch at landing. * With flaps - good job. * With spoilers armed. * Heading aligned with runway. * Throttle(s) idle. * Good controlled final descent to touchdown. * Good steering after landing. Landing included the following problems: * Poor glideslope on visual approach - you can do better. [40%] Definite room for improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts