Denzel 9 Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 Yes, it is. See here: http://www.forum.aer...showtopic=33897 Bests, Sascha Great news Thanx for replying sascha Best regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robinn 4 Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 Are these crosses supposed to be there? Check Attachments Cheers, Robin2010-4-11_0-5-45-810.BMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasa 921 Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Are these crosses supposed to be there? Yes, don't ask me what they mean though... Bests, Sascha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qatsi58 6 Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 yes the A/C is a add on, but that should result in sinking luggage cars into the tarmac... Besides that, the sunken wheels are shining through everything, including buildings and standard A/C. Anyone has the same little problem? cheerio Jan Jan, search the AVSIM or FlightSim library for: FSX Bagcart Fix. It's a little FSX glitch, that seemingly survived two SP's best, Gerrit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qatsi58 6 Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Congrats on the EHRD scenery, i like it a lot! Purchased Sunday morning, and at 12 o'clock ready installed... Dinggg Donggg One question or request i still have. Will there be a update for the DX10 compatibility. I have other airports (Aerosoft's also) which don't have this bleeding tarmac problem in DX10. Not the biggest problem btw, i can very well accept it the way it is (just minor flickering). I would rather bring the ground/apron at night to your attention, which (together with the lights on the poles) doesn't appear in DX10 preview. Regards, Gerrit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted April 13, 2010 Aerosoft Share Posted April 13, 2010 Congrats on the EHRD scenery, i like it a lot! Purchased Sunday morning, and at 12 o'clock ready installed... Dinggg Donggg One question or request i still have. Will there be a update for the DX10 compatibility. I have other airports (Aerosoft's also) which don't have this bleeding tarmac problem in DX10. Not the biggest problem btw, i can very well accept it the way it is (just minor flickering). I would rather bring the ground/apron at night to your attention, which (together with the lights on the poles) doesn't appear in DX10 preview. Regards, Gerrit Sorry Gerrit, not possible. DX10 is not able to display the high resolution used. Making a complete version with lower resolution textures just for DX10 seems to be counterproductive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasa 921 Posted April 13, 2010 Share Posted April 13, 2010 Congrats on the EHRD scenery, i like it a lot! Purchased Sunday morning, and at 12 o'clock ready installed... Dinggg Donggg Little side note: If you fly by the church east of the airport you'll hear a "Ding Dong" between 12:00 and 13:00 local time. Bests, Sascha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qatsi58 6 Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 Yes, very nice touch Gerrit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartjefsx 0 Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 I am missing a charts pdf-file? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
737FREAK 9 Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 I've solved the ILS frequency-issue. EHRD ILS is now 110.90 and I deleted the EHVB ILS, so now it's an orphan Localizer (glide slopes can be deleted). I did this with Airport Design Editor 9x. So for people who don't use EHVB and want use the real frequencies for EHRD, then this is the perfect solution. Otherwise, you can use the default files You can download the modified here (with a README): http://www.megaupload.com/?d=MJKLL98D I hope it's okay with the copyrights and stuff… EDIT: Corrected the download link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtualstuff 76 Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Little side note: If you fly by the church east of the airport you'll hear a "Ding Dong" between 12:00 and 13:00 local time. Bests, Sascha Question Sascha does the scenery interact with simconnect ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasa 921 Posted April 28, 2010 Share Posted April 28, 2010 Question Sascha does the scenery interact with simconnect ? No. Bests, Sascha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasa 921 Posted April 28, 2010 Share Posted April 28, 2010 I hope it's okay with the copyrights and stuff… I didn't check it, but as long as you only use my edited AF2 file an no other files from my scnery it's ok. Thanks a lot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
737FREAK 9 Posted April 28, 2010 Share Posted April 28, 2010 Yes Sasa, I've only edited your AF2-file (and the default APX49130.bgl-file) No problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasamicke 1 Posted April 29, 2010 Share Posted April 29, 2010 Hi there! There seems to be some warehouse autogen buildings missing on short final to runway 24. This is just a minor thing but it would be nice to have the 3D structures that close to the runway. Best regards Mikael. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7neophyte7 2 Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 I think so too: are you perhaps using the popular freeware AFCAD for EHAM by Jim Vile (downloaded from AVSIM)? My taxisigns and service vehicles were all over the place since this AFCAD for EHAM also includes one for EHRD (and also other Dutch airports). Using Airport Design Editor you can delete the EHRD part in this AFCAD so that it won't interfere with the Rotterdam X scenery. I also use the Jim Vile AFCAD. Now I had the same problem, I want to keep the EHAM part an want to delete the EHRD part in ADE. Unfortunatly i'm not ver familiar with this program. Can someone tell me how to do this? Thx already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
737FREAK 9 Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 You can use my AFCAD for EHAM, it is better and more up-to date than Jim's. Download it here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=C9RD9G83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7neophyte7 2 Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 You can use my AFCAD for EHAM, it is better and more up-to date than Jim's. Download it here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=C9RD9G83 Will try this one tnx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
driver101 8 Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 I've solved the ILS frequency-issue. EHRD ILS is now 110.90 and I deleted the EHVB ILS, so now it's an orphan Localizer (glide slopes can be deleted). I did this with Airport Design Editor 9x. So for people who don't use EHVB and want use the real frequencies for EHRD, then this is the perfect solution. Otherwise, you can use the default files You can download the modified here (with a README): http://www.megaupload.com/?d=MJKLL98D I hope it's okay with the copyrights and stuffÂ… EDIT: Corrected the download link Hi 737freak, I have downloaded the files and the ILS in the FSX Map is now showing 110.90 but I am not able to receive it via the radios. Any ideas? Cheers Jan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndewinter 0 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 Hi, First I would like to say, an very great scenery!! But I am having trouble about AI-planes. I am using the program from World of AI for add AI-planes to my scenery. This always works good. But in my scenery from Rotterdam, I don't see any AI-planes. I am also using FSC8, and this shows me, I am having AI-planes on the ramp. I add an screenshot, with FSC8 and FSX on my both sreens. On the left, the shot from FSC8 and on the right, the shot on the ramp from Rotterdam. Can you help me with the problem? Many regards, John de Winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted May 14, 2010 Aerosoft Share Posted May 14, 2010 Hi, First I would like to say, an very great scenery!! But I am having trouble about AI-planes. I am using the program from World of AI for add AI-planes to my scenery. This always works good. But in my scenery from Rotterdam, I don't see any AI-planes. I am also using FSC8, and this shows me, I am having AI-planes on the ramp. I add an screenshot, with FSC8 and FSX on my both sreens. On the left, the shot from FSC8 and on the right, the shot on the ramp from Rotterdam. Can you help me with the problem? Many regards, John de Winter There is nothing in a scenery that can 'hide' AI Traffic as far as we know. So we are almost 100% sure the problem is caused by the AI aircraft that are not fully FSX compatible. Try disabling Aircraft Shadow and see if that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted May 14, 2010 Aerosoft Share Posted May 14, 2010 Hi 737freak, I have downloaded the files and the ILS in the FSX Map is now showing 110.90 but I am not able to receive it via the radios. Any ideas? Cheers Jan Check page 6 of the manual ("Important note about the ILS Frequency"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Considero 0 Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 Yesterday I bought the Rotterdam X scenery and I have very mixed feelings about it. It looks fine but I am not happy with some of the decisions that were made. For instance the fact that it is not compatible with the DX10 preview modus. Yes, the texture for the taxiways are great, but now I have to switch DirectX10 preview off. While most of the time FSX gives higher frame rates with DX10 preview checked. I can understand the decision, but I am not happy with it. I tried to use the scenery with DX10 preview checked but in that case the PAPI lights are not visible. The same is true for the choice for a non real ILS frequency. I can understand the choice but I am not happy about it. I also don't like the fact that cars are 'painted' on the textures of the highways. I know it is a photo. I fly a lot of VFR and like the moving cars in FSX. It brings life to the scenery and adds to the feeling you are actually flying. But now it looks strange. The same is true for the containers and cranes in the harbour area. I can understand the decision but I am not happy with it. I know I can restore things as described in the manual. I don't write this because I want to write bad about a product. I have a good life and don't need to vent my frustrations by writing bad about flightsim products. But I just want to let you know I am not happy about the product and I am considering to deinstall it. Things would be a lot better if the product was delivered with a tool that would give me the possiblility to make my own choices. With kind regards, Arjen The Netherlands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Fletcher 570 Posted May 21, 2010 Author Share Posted May 21, 2010 Hello Arjen, As the name suggests its only a preview mode and was of things to come. The main primary DirectX mode for FSX is DX9 and as long as scenery and aircraft comply to this mode alone then there is no fault with the product. I dont care much for the DX10 Preview Mode as its just so buggy and airports have flickering issues on taxiways and runways. Therefore we have a disagreeing opinion, so what may be fine to some is not for others, but because its not made to suit the DX10 Preview Mode in no way reflects the quality of a product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Considero 0 Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 Hello Arjen, As the name suggests its only a preview mode and was of things to come. The main primary DirectX mode for FSX is DX9 and as long as scenery and aircraft comply to this mode alone then there is no fault with the product. I dont care much for the DX10 Preview Mode as its just so buggy and airports have flickering issues on taxiways and runways. Therefore we have a disagreeing opinion, so what may be fine to some is not for others, but because its not made to suit the DX10 Preview Mode in no way reflects the quality of a product. Hi Shaun, I agree with you Shaun, that there is no fault with the product. I just wanted to let you know that I am not happy with some of the decisions that were made with this product. That's all I wanted to let you know. Just feedback from a client. With kind regards, Arjen The Netherlands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts