John Dow 1 Posted December 17, 2021 Share Posted December 17, 2021 HI Can anyone shed light on whether the CRJ can recognise the FSUIPC7 interface? I have my throttles for twin jets mapped as 'send to FSUIPC calibration' but there's no response from the aircraft. this is the only aircraft in the hangar that seems to have this problem. Anyone got it working or have suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft SimWare 730 Posted December 17, 2021 Aerosoft Share Posted December 17, 2021 Hi John, We don't recommend to use FSUIPC for the CRJ. Instead use the standard MSFS assignments. Please check this post. It can be use with any standard throttle with analog axes. Best regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesOReilly 314 Posted December 17, 2021 Share Posted December 17, 2021 11 hours ago, John Dow said: HI Can anyone shed light on whether the CRJ can recognise the FSUIPC7 interface? I have my throttles for twin jets mapped as 'send to FSUIPC calibration' but there's no response from the aircraft. this is the only aircraft in the hangar that seems to have this problem. Anyone got it working or have suggestions? Don't use the legacy simconnect throttle you need to use the ones that have _EX1 next to them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dow 1 Posted December 18, 2021 Author Share Posted December 18, 2021 OK if this can be looked at for a future update it would be appreciated. The reason is, once the sim is set up for FSUIPC controls, it's not practicable to have to go into the controls menu every time I want to fly the CRJ and set the throttle axis. It's the only plane in my entire hangar with this problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabby 28 Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 On 12/18/2021 at 2:56 AM, John Dow said: OK if this can be looked at for a future update it would be appreciated. The reason is, once the sim is set up for FSUIPC controls, it's not practicable to have to go into the controls menu every time I want to fly the CRJ and set the throttle axis. It's the only plane in my entire hangar with this problem. Actually, it is practical because you CAN do that. You CAN set up a different controller profile in MSFS for each aircraft you want to fly. You CAN remember to swap out the profiles before flying each plane. You CAN do all that, so it is practical. Or, you CAN get Axis and Ohs or SpadNext, set up profiles for each aircraft once while at the same time unlocking more feature rich control capabilities and then let AAO or SpadNext do the remembering for you when you select an aircraft to fly and load in the aircraft specific profile. They work with all aircraft and you will save yourself a ton of time and headaches. Both options are practical, one is just more sensible and time saving in the short, mid and long-term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesOReilly 314 Posted December 22, 2021 Share Posted December 22, 2021 On 12/18/2021 at 3:56 AM, John Dow said: OK if this can be looked at for a future update it would be appreciated. The reason is, once the sim is set up for FSUIPC controls, it's not practicable to have to go into the controls menu every time I want to fly the CRJ and set the throttle axis. It's the only plane in my entire hangar with this problem. FSUIPC supports profiles for planes as well and will auto swap ... msfs is the one that added the additional _EX1 versions of these commands... so it really is what is being documented to be used with the SDK going forward... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft SimWare 730 Posted December 30, 2021 Aerosoft Share Posted December 30, 2021 As addition I would say that having to switch profiles in MSFS can be seen as a sim checklist. We use complex planes with dozen of checklist steps. Having to switch profile in MSFS should not be overwhelming ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.