Jump to content

Aerosoft Aircraft A320/A321, A318/A319, A330


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, SpeedbirdSimulation said:

 

Good morning Mathijs, any more updates for us yet, i'm enjoying the FBW teams mod of the 320, but very much looking foward to Aerosoft rendition!

 

kind regards

A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Okidoki, so I am sure you won't mind if we remove you from this topic for 36 months. 

We have to start a preview post about our Airbus Microsoft Flight Simulator projects at some time, so why not now?   As most people will know we have three aircraft projects for MFS in devel

I can confirm the A330 has priority at this moment. 

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Car147 said:

A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present.

not taken the wrong way, as said i enjoy the FBW, but im just looking forward the aerosoft version.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/29/2021 at 5:42 AM, Car147 said:

A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present.

 

Hmm, I personally have less problem with the FMS of the CRJ than the A32NX .. You cannot compare the ILS of the CRJ and an Airbus ..

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sébastien Marleau said:

 

Hmm, I personally have less problem with the FMS of the CRJ than the A32NX .. You cannot compare the ILS of the CRJ and an Airbus ..

I take it your not upto speed with recent developments of the A320NX or it's systems

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Root Admin
13 minutes ago, Car147 said:

I take it your not upto speed with recent developments of the A320NX or it's systems

 

Do not get me wrong, we love what the people do with it and have supported them every way possible.

 

But it remains a NEO model with panels of a CEO IAE.

Link to post
Share on other sites
vor 23 Stunden , Mathijs Kok sagte:

 

Do not get me wrong, we love what the people do with it and have supported them every way possible.

 

But it remains a NEO model with panels of a CEO IAE.

You are absolutely right, but it is only a matter of time until that changes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/29/2021 at 11:42 AM, Car147 said:

A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present.

Can it properly do SIDs, STARs and approaches now? It's been far off the quality of the CRJ FMC up to recently at least, and until the USR and lack of flyable/editable approaches, this statement is a bit weird.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

Sorry, all the work done at this moment in on porting C++ code from P3D to MSFS.

Which means a lot of testing will need to happen before adapting to MSFS and building new features to leverage the platforms capabilities - this is a lot of hard work. Taking a wild guess, we may see it by end of this year, on an optimistic note.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, pchitkara said:

Taking a wild guess, we may see it by end of this year, on an optimistic note.

Mathijs has already said he's got one planned for released at the end of the year. But that could always change depending what happens.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/29/2021 at 10:42 AM, Car147 said:

A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present.

Thanks for the childish down vote.... grow up lol

  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Mathijs Kok,

Please, the whole community who enjoy long haul need of the A330 fast as possible!

The Aerosoft started with the right foot very well into MSFS releasing the CRJ, now it's time of the A330!

 

PLEEEAASSE

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/3/2021 at 7:54 AM, Mathijs Kok said:

Sorry, all the work done at this moment in on porting C++ code from P3D to MSFS.

so this is not from scratch, like the CRJ? 

as im sure i read all code was from scratch, or has the SDK come a little further where porting can take place?

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Rafael Souza said:

Hi @Mathijs Kok,

Please, the whole community who enjoy long haul need of the A330 fast as possible!

The Aerosoft started with the right foot very well into MSFS releasing the CRJ, now it's time of the A330!

 

PLEEEAASSE


The question is, does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first?
This is just my opionion, but I believe the vast majority of flightsim flights are "standard" ones. And again Im only speaking for myself, but I would truly welcome the A319/20/21 before anything else. FBW has improved alot, but its not enough for me to make the switch to MSFS. Im looking forward to Aerosofts A319/320.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Deputy Sheriffs
36 minutes ago, SpeedbirdSimulation said:

so this is not from scratch, like the CRJ? 

as im sure i read all code was from scratch, or has the SDK come a little further where porting can take place?

The model will be from scratch. The code will not be from scratch. It would take years to rewrite the complete code from scratch. But the port to MSFS does also take some time. It’s not only copy paste.

During this phase and the Alpha/ beta testing will be of course improvements and further bugfixing.

And the same goes for the CRJ if I remember correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Root Admin
1 hour ago, SpeedbirdSimulation said:

so this is not from scratch, like the CRJ? 

as im sure i read all code was from scratch, or has the SDK come a little further where porting can take place?

 

Some parts are reused, but everything has to be changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Brittanix said:


The question is, does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first?
 

 

I believe so

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Brittanix said:

does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first?

 

I think the majority prefer short to mid over long hauls, I do like a good long haul (I get more jobs/work done in the cruise ;)) I am desperate for a long hauler in MSFS, so much so I would pay a 500% price increase for it now. Hopefully we see the A330 or another long hauler sooner rather than later

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
vor 10 Stunden , Nicolas AUGUSTE sagte:

I hope aerosoft will be released first A318 and A319 

I think they said first the A320 and a321.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Til1986 said:

I think they said first the A320 and a321.

I think you're right. based off FSX and P3D the A320/A321 came before the A318/A319

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2021 at 12:56 PM, Brittanix said:


The question is, does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first?
This is just my opionion, but I believe the vast majority of flightsim flights are "standard" ones. And again Im only speaking for myself, but I would truly welcome the A319/20/21 before anything else. FBW has improved alot, but its not enough for me to make the switch to MSFS. Im looking forward to Aerosofts A319/320.
 

 

You could fly most A320/A321 routes with an A330 as well. You just have to convince yourself that there's so much passenger traffic it made economic sense. 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/7/2021 at 5:24 PM, ktomais said:

 

You could fly most A320/A321 routes with an A330 as well. You just have to convince yourself that there's so much passenger traffic it made economic sense. 

 

Not if one is flying for Virtual Airlines, which is what I do ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...