Car147 70 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 30 minutes ago, SpeedbirdSimulation said: Good morning Mathijs, any more updates for us yet, i'm enjoying the FBW teams mod of the 320, but very much looking foward to Aerosoft rendition! kind regards A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedbirdSimulation 73 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 hour ago, Car147 said: A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present. not taken the wrong way, as said i enjoy the FBW, but im just looking forward the aerosoft version. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sébastien Marleau 5 Posted April 30, 2021 Share Posted April 30, 2021 On 4/29/2021 at 5:42 AM, Car147 said: A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present. Hmm, I personally have less problem with the FMS of the CRJ than the A32NX .. You cannot compare the ILS of the CRJ and an Airbus .. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Car147 70 Posted April 30, 2021 Share Posted April 30, 2021 5 hours ago, Sébastien Marleau said: Hmm, I personally have less problem with the FMS of the CRJ than the A32NX .. You cannot compare the ILS of the CRJ and an Airbus .. I take it your not upto speed with recent developments of the A320NX or it's systems 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted April 30, 2021 Author Aerosoft Share Posted April 30, 2021 13 minutes ago, Car147 said: I take it your not upto speed with recent developments of the A320NX or it's systems Do not get me wrong, we love what the people do with it and have supported them every way possible. But it remains a NEO model with panels of a CEO IAE. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Til1986 36 Posted May 1, 2021 Share Posted May 1, 2021 vor 23 Stunden , Mathijs Kok sagte: Do not get me wrong, we love what the people do with it and have supported them every way possible. But it remains a NEO model with panels of a CEO IAE. You are absolutely right, but it is only a matter of time until that changes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PilotTimo 9 Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 Any new progress updates? Maybe some pictures to share...? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted May 3, 2021 Author Aerosoft Share Posted May 3, 2021 Sorry, all the work done at this moment in on porting C++ code from P3D to MSFS. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldhaulfield 20 Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 On 4/29/2021 at 11:42 AM, Car147 said: A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present. Can it properly do SIDs, STARs and approaches now? It's been far off the quality of the CRJ FMC up to recently at least, and until the USR and lack of flyable/editable approaches, this statement is a bit weird. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pchitkara 54 Posted May 4, 2021 Share Posted May 4, 2021 22 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said: Sorry, all the work done at this moment in on porting C++ code from P3D to MSFS. Which means a lot of testing will need to happen before adapting to MSFS and building new features to leverage the platforms capabilities - this is a lot of hard work. Taking a wild guess, we may see it by end of this year, on an optimistic note. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternT3 402 Posted May 4, 2021 Share Posted May 4, 2021 3 hours ago, pchitkara said: Taking a wild guess, we may see it by end of this year, on an optimistic note. Mathijs has already said he's got one planned for released at the end of the year. But that could always change depending what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Car147 70 Posted May 4, 2021 Share Posted May 4, 2021 On 4/29/2021 at 10:42 AM, Car147 said: A strange statement as currently the A320NX handles navigation better than the CRJ at the moment. No zig zag following the route, ILS hit everytime now, and even auto land. Please don't take this the wrong way, but is the current state at present. Thanks for the childish down vote.... grow up lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanHard StyleCoreRaw 0 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 it's the release of the 320 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Souza 12 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Hi @Mathijs Kok, Please, the whole community who enjoy long haul need of the A330 fast as possible! The Aerosoft started with the right foot very well into MSFS releasing the CRJ, now it's time of the A330! PLEEEAASSE 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedbirdSimulation 73 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 On 5/3/2021 at 7:54 AM, Mathijs Kok said: Sorry, all the work done at this moment in on porting C++ code from P3D to MSFS. so this is not from scratch, like the CRJ? as im sure i read all code was from scratch, or has the SDK come a little further where porting can take place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brittanix 12 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 7 hours ago, Rafael Souza said: Hi @Mathijs Kok, Please, the whole community who enjoy long haul need of the A330 fast as possible! The Aerosoft started with the right foot very well into MSFS releasing the CRJ, now it's time of the A330! PLEEEAASSE The question is, does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first? This is just my opionion, but I believe the vast majority of flightsim flights are "standard" ones. And again Im only speaking for myself, but I would truly welcome the A319/20/21 before anything else. FBW has improved alot, but its not enough for me to make the switch to MSFS. Im looking forward to Aerosofts A319/320. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs masterhawk 799 Posted May 6, 2021 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted May 6, 2021 36 minutes ago, SpeedbirdSimulation said: so this is not from scratch, like the CRJ? as im sure i read all code was from scratch, or has the SDK come a little further where porting can take place? The model will be from scratch. The code will not be from scratch. It would take years to rewrite the complete code from scratch. But the port to MSFS does also take some time. It’s not only copy paste. During this phase and the Alpha/ beta testing will be of course improvements and further bugfixing. And the same goes for the CRJ if I remember correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted May 6, 2021 Author Aerosoft Share Posted May 6, 2021 1 hour ago, SpeedbirdSimulation said: so this is not from scratch, like the CRJ? as im sure i read all code was from scratch, or has the SDK come a little further where porting can take place? Some parts are reused, but everything has to be changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Souza 12 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 3 hours ago, Brittanix said: The question is, does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first? I believe so 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternT3 402 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 10 hours ago, Brittanix said: does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first? I think the majority prefer short to mid over long hauls, I do like a good long haul (I get more jobs/work done in the cruise ) I am desperate for a long hauler in MSFS, so much so I would pay a 500% price increase for it now. Hopefully we see the A330 or another long hauler sooner rather than later 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicolas AUGUSTE 1 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 I hope aerosoft will be released first A318 and A319 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Til1986 36 Posted May 7, 2021 Share Posted May 7, 2021 vor 10 Stunden , Nicolas AUGUSTE sagte: I hope aerosoft will be released first A318 and A319 I think they said first the A320 and a321. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternT3 402 Posted May 7, 2021 Share Posted May 7, 2021 1 hour ago, Til1986 said: I think they said first the A320 and a321. I think you're right. based off FSX and P3D the A320/A321 came before the A318/A319 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktomais 56 Posted May 7, 2021 Share Posted May 7, 2021 On 5/6/2021 at 12:56 PM, Brittanix said: The question is, does a large enough part of the community fly long haul, to justify a possible A330 as the plane to be released first? This is just my opionion, but I believe the vast majority of flightsim flights are "standard" ones. And again Im only speaking for myself, but I would truly welcome the A319/20/21 before anything else. FBW has improved alot, but its not enough for me to make the switch to MSFS. Im looking forward to Aerosofts A319/320. You could fly most A320/A321 routes with an A330 as well. You just have to convince yourself that there's so much passenger traffic it made economic sense. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brittanix 12 Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 On 5/7/2021 at 5:24 PM, ktomais said: You could fly most A320/A321 routes with an A330 as well. You just have to convince yourself that there's so much passenger traffic it made economic sense. Not if one is flying for Virtual Airlines, which is what I do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts