AlleUsai 0 Posted August 25, 2020 Share Posted August 25, 2020 Hi, just bought Aerosoft Mega Airport Rome v1.4 on SimMrket web site. I use P3D v4.5 HF3 on W10 (10.0.19041 Build 19041) and I see all gates and parking are designed RAMP_GA except parking 101, 102 and 103 that are RAMP_CARGO. Is this correct? I think not but may be I'm going wrong. Please login to display this image. Any hint? Thanks in advance, Alessandro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
data63 421 Posted August 26, 2020 Share Posted August 26, 2020 that's somehow ok as it is a way to get rid of the default service vehicles that are present at "Gates" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlleUsai 0 Posted August 27, 2020 Author Share Posted August 27, 2020 11 hours ago, data63 said: that's somehow ok as it is a way to get rid of the default service vehicles that are present at "Gates" Hi Jurgen, thank you. I know this way but Aerosoft Support said "this does not appear to be correct". Waiting for AS Support early news. Have a nice day, Alessandro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
data63 421 Posted August 27, 2020 Share Posted August 27, 2020 I checked the AFCAD for Rome 1.04 dated 23.08.17 - the parkings are alle RAMP_GA - just the 3 Cargos are different. I think if you set airport traffic to ZERO (which you should do if using GSX or something like that) - you can change the type to GATE_ (e.g. with ADE) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlleUsai 0 Posted August 27, 2020 Author Share Posted August 27, 2020 27 minutes ago, data63 said: I checked the AFCAD for Rome 1.04 dated 23.08.17 - the parkings are alle RAMP_GA - just the 3 Cargos are different. I think if you set airport traffic to ZERO (which you should do if using GSX or something like that) - you can change the type to GATE_ (e.g. with ADE) Hi Juergen, I'm quite sure that your suggestion could be valid. I want to test original AFCAD with ProAtc X (arrival gate assignment, etc) and with AI Traffic (UTL) for any issues. Alessandro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
data63 421 Posted August 27, 2020 Share Posted August 27, 2020 UTL should work as lang as the airline codes are ok - ProATC should also work as if no "Gates" are resent it will go with the radius of the spots and their order in the AFCAD (may send you on remotes ;-)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlleUsai 0 Posted August 28, 2020 Author Share Posted August 28, 2020 Hi Juergen, I'll check both on the next weekend. AS support notified me that this will be fixed in a future update. Have a nice day, Alessandro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.