Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dear friends, we are really sorry this message is released later then we hoped.   We are excited to announce that the Aerosoft CRJ 550/700 for the Microsoft Flight Simulator will be released

I will add my support to Mathijs sentiment here.  One of the things we constantly try to snuff out is this popular meme that developers are all in competition with one another like newspaper barkers o

My sincerest apologies for this situation - it was a couple members of our team who exercised rather poor judgement, and they have been spoken to. I assure you this won't happen again. We have the hig

Posted Images

1 hour ago, thokle said:

@Mathijs Kok
I found a small typing error in the manual. Page 9 -> Basic Facts -> Metric units - the range of the CRJ700 is in "kg" instead of "km". I know it is not finished yet, but I saw it and wanted to let you know. :)

 

Quote

If anybody has any comment, do send it to Mathijs.Kok@aerosoft.com. If you like to help translating, please do. We intend to share this manual in 8 languages.

regarding the manual.

Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Robert Xones said:

I am the creator of this airport. However I already was advised to not go offtopic with this here so for any further questions send a pm. Back on track with the crj

Oh! Sorry sir, thanks for answer! btw. looking amazing!!🤩

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Mathijs Kok said:

I wish I could say (or even know). We are still working on showstoppers with Asobo. Will be a long evening again.

 

 

Aside from purchasing products you guys (if you haven’t already). Should set up a donation system. Honestly everyday I come here and get my questions answered. I would be happy giving something like a donation so the devs can have a beer on me! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Root Admin
12 minutes ago, Surfwarrior said:

Aside from purchasing products you guys (if you haven’t already). Should set up a donation system. Honestly everyday I come here and get my questions answered. I would be happy giving something like a donation so the devs can have a beer on me! 

 

Not needed. I will buy them that beer on my expense account. Cheap supermarket beer though.  

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one question to the updated manual. Is this version only for the CRJ 550/700 or also for the 900 and 1000 version?

 

Background is simply that you talk so often about the CRJ 700 and 900 which is not part of the base package and also the manual title is "CRJ 550/700".

Just want to make sure this is how it should be :D

 

Just a few examples: Also the headline for the CRJ500/700 add-on is in this case "Transitioning to the Bombardier CRJ 700 and 900" 🤔

image.thumb.png.dab607ac69fed12d477c7c26d5084e6e.png

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

image.thumb.png.8a2424e89587a285c5e50cfdcdc2afc3.png

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Hans Hartmann said:

Not in the initial version. May be later. And I would prefer to do this once there's a way to use TCP or UDP communications in WASM (from inside the sandbox). I don't have any information about when and how network commucation will be available so far.

 

Yep, currently the only way to accomplish network communication, as far as I know, is through JavaScript fetch requests through HTML gauges (which is what we currently do). But based on Mathijs's comments on the great performance of the CRJ running solely with WASM gauges, that definitely seems the way to go in the long run. Hopefully proper in-sim weather (and terrain) SDK support comes soon.

 

Has there been any news regarding some SDK issues - for example the corrupted pContext parameter in SimConnect_CallDispatch? I'm curious as to whether those are impacting the progress of any other third-party developers.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

but to the 1.2 million users who installed MFS

 

Personal curiosity, is this Aerosoft's estimate, Asobo's, or something they actually announced and I happened to miss? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

Now we just got to deliver. We did with scenery. I think some of the best MFS scenery is done by us and I think our Paderborn airport that is free is the best value for money on airport scenery.

In my unbiased personal opinion Aerosoft certainly makes THE best sceneries for MSFS. Paderborn was my introduction to the fabulous standards of Aerosoft. I was bowled over that it was graciously offered for free! This proved to me that Aerosoft may be a business concern but it is also kindhearted.

 

Cologne/Bönn was my first purchase from Aerosoft and I was so awestruck by the stunning attention to fine details and the quality of every bit of artifacts. The bonus was of course the VDGS. Then came Trondheim. Another masterpiece by my most admired developer, Jo Arlend. I will unabashedly admit that I am his fan.

 

There are no other airport offered by anyone else where one can exit the aircraft door, walk through the jetway looking out at the aircraft, and into the terminal, take the working escalator down and exit the terminal!

 

To me every airport development by Jo is a masterpiece and a collector’s item.

 

I did purchase another European airport by another developer and I can see and feel  the difference in standards straight away. The magic just isn’t there. But no regrets because Aerosoft is also said to be developing the same airport and I will just purchase it and replace what I have currently.

 

So yes! Definitely Aerosoft makes THE best scenery for MSFS. Anyone who haven’t yet experienced this level of quality and development skills is without doubt missing out.

 

Looking forward to more and more sceneries ... Aerosoft sceneries that is!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Abriael said:

Personal curiosity, is this Aerosoft's estimate, Asobo's, or something they actually announced and I happened to miss? 

There was an announcement made but I can’t recall the source now. I believe MSFS forum also has also discussed this when it passed the 1M mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Deputy Sheriffs
3 hours ago, Abriael said:

 

Personal curiosity, is this Aerosoft's estimate, Asobo's, or something they actually announced and I happened to miss? 

One million by three weeks after launch, per Microsoft head of MFS here. I don't know where the 1.2 million number came from or its reliability, but given the time since the 1 million milestone and the number of "wait-and-see" types in various forums that decided to go for it, I don't find 1.2 million at all unrealistic.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Herman said:

One million by three weeks after launch, per Microsoft head of MFS here. I don't know where the 1.2 million number came from or its reliability, but given the time since the 1 million milestone and the number of "wait-and-see" types in various forums that decided to go for it, I don't find 1.2 million at all unrealistic.

 

Oh yeah, I wasn't doubting the estimate at all. Was just wondering about where it came from :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...