Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I will add my support to Mathijs sentiment here.  One of the things we constantly try to snuff out is this popular meme that developers are all in competition with one another like newspaper barkers o

My sincerest apologies for this situation - it was a couple members of our team who exercised rather poor judgement, and they have been spoken to. I assure you this won't happen again. We have the hig

Your wish, our command.    

Posted Images

  • Root Admin
14 hours ago, ArcticMarkus said:

I suppose there's always the possibility for users to create their own mods by editing the cockpit texture files? Gotta have that ultra pink cockpit mod

 

Yes, in January we'll work on the paintkit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Root Admin
3 hours ago, M4V3R1CK said:

Microsoft announced another (small) update for tomorrow or actually today? (I'm confused by the time zones :D)

https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/news-another-update-coming-tomorrow/333484

 

Maybe there we will get something for the CRJ? :)

 

No as far as we know this was to sort out issues for Carenado and BBS.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Root Admin

As I am waiting for a download... why not insert and image one of the internal testers send me.... We are a long way from FS2004 are we not? 

 

image_2020_12_09T09_54_40_364Z.png

 

As the forum tends to compress images a bit too much I will also add the image in full 4k zipped format so you can see it in full glory.

 

 

image_2020_12_09T09_54_40_364Z.zip

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

As I am waiting for a download... why not insert and image one of the internal testers send me.... We are a long way from FS2004 are we not? 

[...]

 

As the forum tends to compress images a bit too much I will also add the image in full 4k zipped format so you can see it in full glory.

 

 

image_2020_12_09T09_54_40_364Z.zip 17.27 MB · 13 downloads

Hi Mathijs, testing has already started?

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Mathijs Kok said:

As the forum tends to compress images a bit too much I will also add the image in full 4k zipped format so you can see it in full glory.

 

I think this shows that you're not just thinking about the commercial success of this product, but also how proud you are of it! It really shows and gives confidence to us future customers!

 

Keep up the great work. fingers crossed the (Asobo) stars align and you get beta testing completed, and everything cleared up FS wise before Christmas :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mathijs Kok said:

Of course most of the core code has been running on P3D for a few years.

 

This may have been answered previously, or is too long for a forum post, but what is the process to converting code to FS2020. Having played a small part in the A32X project, using JS and html on the screens was a really interesting experience. Is it a complete conversion of code, or can you still take lots from the previous version?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

4K is a magic thing, that's right and MSFS takes full advantage of it, Mathijs are fully right. Here is an example from the pedestal of the A32NX-mod; I hope, this picture will be allowed. It is 4k and hopefully the upcoming airbusses will come in this quality or even better too. For the CRJ there's no doubt about that.

Screenshot (225).png

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

 

Try the default navdata of MFS, it is up to date and contains more data the Navigraph as far as we know. I do not fully understand why an external paid navdata set makes sense at this moment.  I say _this_ moment as we are unable to access the build in data of MFS right now and will deliver an up to data Lufthansa Data Systems data set with the CRJ. We rather would not, but we have no option at this moment.

OK, thank you. I am going to do the same flight without Navigraph and see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Developer
1 hour ago, NHAviator99 said:

Are the 900/1000 versions at the same development stage or behind? The 900 is my favorite version of this jet so ill be flying that the most when they release. 

From the programming side, at the same stage. Models and flight dynamics need more work.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

 

Try the default navdata of MFS, it is up to date and contains more data the Navigraph as far as we know. I do not fully understand why an external paid navdata set makes sense at this moment.  I say _this_ moment as we are unable to access the build in data of MFS right now and will deliver an up to data Lufthansa Data Systems data set with the CRJ. We rather would not, but we have no option at this moment.

What does this mean when you do the flightplan in MFS? How is it inserted into the FMS?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Galax17 said:

What does this mean when you do the flightplan in MFS? How is it inserted into the FMS?

suspect it will be much like the previous sims; you’ll have to either import a flight plan file directly in the MCDU/FMC/FMS manually, or directly program every step of the route in by hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like many here I’m really excited about the CRJ, and I have even said that multiple times over the week! MSFS is my first flight simulator but I already love it and will be investing so much time and money into it. Seeing how the CRJ looks has made me amazed by what aerosoft is capable of and makes me even more excited to see what you guys are able to do in the years to come! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Root Admin
9 minutes ago, Jeremy Walcott said:

@Mathijs Kok OMG stop the torture now 

 

Nope. Here are some images of the displays we have not shown yet (sorry for the sloppy pictures, had a bit of a fight with my MFS today, it won).

Some things might still change but all you see here should simply behave as it does on the real aircraft. 

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

 

 

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Mathijs Kok changed the title to Aerosoft Aircraft: CRJ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...