Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dear friends, we are really sorry this message is released later then we hoped.   We are excited to announce that the Aerosoft CRJ 550/700 for the Microsoft Flight Simulator will be released

I will add my support to Mathijs sentiment here.  One of the things we constantly try to snuff out is this popular meme that developers are all in competition with one another like newspaper barkers o

My sincerest apologies for this situation - it was a couple members of our team who exercised rather poor judgement, and they have been spoken to. I assure you this won't happen again. We have the hig

Posted Images

  • Root Admin
1 hour ago, Jeroen Doorman said:

It’s so clean 😎


Squeakyy clean. But that's where we start. we add bad paint and dirt on top of that. Again, we are modeling paint imperfections these days, how crazy is that?

  • Like 9
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

Noen flere bilder ... ingenting virkelig nytt å se, men sammenlign dette med standardfly, og du ser at vi lærer noen nye triks .... Fortsatt mye mangler, men vi kommer dit! Som du vil se er den nåværende modellen en helt ny og svært polert. Det må fortsatt få skitt og malingsfeil. Kan du tro at vi nå snakker om ufullkommenheter i et malingslag? Da jeg begynte med Flightsim var Paris en enorm uniformspolygon med 7 hjørner. London var kult ettersom det hadde en elv og 15 hjørner.


Og som sagt, vi vil ikke gjøre billige porter fra P3d V4, alt dette er helt nye ting. Klikk og åpne for å se full størrelse ...





Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Hans Hartmann said:



I made a short (and crude) video about how things currently look. After removing a major roadblock, it felt like the right time to share.


Those screens don't look flat! Is that a CRT curvature that's modelled into these screens? Or are my eyes deceiving me?

EDIT: This one in particular, looks a little "bubbled":


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks great, can't wait to purchase this and give it a spin.
a point tho, has been discussed in relation to aircraft for p3d in the past, but i think it shows even more here.

This could use higher resolution textures on the exterior, looking at the screenshots:
The red text in the second last screenshot is already quite a bit blurry, and the same goes for the top of the lufthansa letters in the last screenshot.

Has the texture resolution been increased compared to the p3d version or the same resolution? Increasing it would really make it 'pop' so much more.
Of course i can understand the concerns for performance, but maybe giving the livery painter the option to use high res textures would be possible?




Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Hans Hartmann said:

Yes, there is a curve in the glass, but it has been there in the CRJ Pro already. So nothing new.

Ah I’ve only ever used the FSX version, which wasn’t curved if I remember correctly. 

Nice to see all these little details, it keeps reminding me that this is a living and breathing product line!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • CRJ Forum Moderator

Will the FMS database still be based on Navigraph or Aerosoft AIRAC data as it is in FSX/P3D? The default MSFS NavBlue nav data is of poor quality (especially in the US). There are many missing or obsolete procedures. I am using the new Navigraph beta replacement for the default MSFS nav data and it is much better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...