Microsoft Flight Simulator Aerosoft Aircraft: CRJ

[Mathijs Kok 39277]

Some more images... nothing really new to see but do compare this to default aircraft and you see we are learning some new tricks.... Still a lot missing, but we are getting there! As you will see the current model is one that is brand new and highly polished. It still needs to get its dirt and paint imperfections. Can you believe we are now talking about imperfections in a paint layer? When I started with Flightsim Paris was one huge uniform polygon with 7 corners. London was cool as it had a river and 15 corners.

 

And as said, we will not do cheap ports from P3d V4, this is all brand new stuff.  Click and open to see full size...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Jeroen Doorman 1735]

It’s so clean 😎

[The Dude 6435]

It has the wrong livery. 😎

[Mathijs Kok 39277]

1 hour ago, Jeroen Doorman said:

It’s so clean 😎

 

Squeakyy clean. But that's where we start. we add bad paint and dirt on top of that. Again, we are modeling paint imperfections these days, how crazy is that?

[amahran 434]

3 hours ago, Jeroen Doorman said:

It’s so clean 😎

Cleaner than aircraft I've seen off final assembly lines 😎

[generale84 157]

awesome!

btw, I suppose that the work for adapt the EFB in MSFS2020 will be arduous

[Pit Petersen 1]

Wow!! That looks good. This is my idea of a new airplane. How I am looking forward to the release.

 

[Jude 186]

I am really trying hard not to buy MS2020, but you are making it difficult for me  

 

[PWS Plane 10]

21 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

Noen flere bilder ... ingenting virkelig nytt å se, men sammenlign dette med standardfly, og du ser at vi lærer noen nye triks .... Fortsatt mye mangler, men vi kommer dit! Som du vil se er den nåværende modellen en helt ny og svært polert. Det må fortsatt få skitt og malingsfeil. Kan du tro at vi nå snakker om ufullkommenheter i et malingslag? Da jeg begynte med Flightsim var Paris en enorm uniformspolygon med 7 hjørner. London var kult ettersom det hadde en elv og 15 hjørner.

 

Og som sagt, vi vil ikke gjøre billige porter fra P3d V4, alt dette er helt nye ting. Klikk og åpne for å se full størrelse ...

[...]

 

 

excellent

[Mathijs Kok 39277]

10 hours ago, generale84 said:

awesome!

btw, I suppose that the work for adapt the EFB in MSFS2020 will be arduous

 

Not so much as we feared.

[leo03000 22]

This absolutely stunning! I cannot wait for the release. Awesome job everyone!

[Akki 2]

Fantastic work, as usual. Thanks Aerosoft

Åke

[Pauleti68 1]

I can not wait anymore ! Congratulations to you !

[alsummers 2]

Stunning work.  Though I'm more of a propeller pilot, so am looking forward to getting hold of the Twin Otter sometime further down the line.

 

Thanks for your efforts.

[Martin "MO" 6]

That looks very, very good, great job !!

... I'm already looking forward to the first practical test flight... 😉

[Eduard Gasull 258]

On 9/1/2020 at 7:20 PM, Mathijs Kok said:

Some more images... nothing really new to see but do compare this to default aircraft and you see we are learning some new tricks....

 

Aerosoft modelers are simply stunning. Amazing job.

[Jude 186]

Well I bit the bullet and bought the basic version of MS2020. Looking forward to a decent aircraft for it. 

[janda 3]

ok, but if you show pictures of Crj then don't show them in the MSFS hangar because the models in the simulator don't look at the same level as there ok?

[Hans Hartmann 3113]

https://youtu.be/ni8Xpei7nv8

 

I made a short (and crude) video about how things currently look. After removing a major roadblock, it felt like the right time to share.

[DaveCT2003 2521]

58 minutes ago, Hans Hartmann said:

https://youtu.be/ni8Xpei7nv8

 

I made a short (and crude) video about how things currently look. After removing a major roadblock, it felt like the right time to share.

 

 

Very nice!

 

 

[amahran 434]

5 hours ago, Hans Hartmann said:

https://youtu.be/ni8Xpei7nv8

 

I made a short (and crude) video about how things currently look. After removing a major roadblock, it felt like the right time to share.

 

Those screens don't look flat! Is that a CRT curvature that's modelled into these screens? Or are my eyes deceiving me?

EDIT: This one in particular, looks a little "bubbled":

[Hans Hartmann 3113]

Yes, there is a curve in the glass, but it has been there in the CRJ Pro already. So nothing new.

[niels95 13]

It looks great, can't wait to purchase this and give it a spin.
a point tho, has been discussed in relation to aircraft for p3d in the past, but i think it shows even more here.

This could use higher resolution textures on the exterior, looking at the screenshots:
The red text in the second last screenshot is already quite a bit blurry, and the same goes for the top of the lufthansa letters in the last screenshot.

Has the texture resolution been increased compared to the p3d version or the same resolution? Increasing it would really make it 'pop' so much more.
Of course i can understand the concerns for performance, but maybe giving the livery painter the option to use high res textures would be possible?

 

Thanks!
Niels.

 

[amahran 434]

6 hours ago, Hans Hartmann said:

Yes, there is a curve in the glass, but it has been there in the CRJ Pro already. So nothing new.

Ah I’ve only ever used the FSX version, which wasn’t curved if I remember correctly. 
 

Nice to see all these little details, it keeps reminding me that this is a living and breathing product line!

[JRBarrett 501]

Will the FMS database still be based on Navigraph or Aerosoft AIRAC data as it is in FSX/P3D? The default MSFS NavBlue nav data is of poor quality (especially in the US). There are many missing or obsolete procedures. I am using the new Navigraph beta replacement for the default MSFS nav data and it is much better.