VHOJT 57 Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 Hi all (and Stephen ), I am just wondering - with the default RB211 747-400 file, I NEVER see any difference between NO optimisation and MIN Fuel. I do see MIN TIME changes things. Any idea of why this might be the case? Is there something else I need to set? Cheers, Rudy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VHOJT 57 Posted August 24, 2019 Author Share Posted August 24, 2019 Hello chaps, any ideas on this matter? Never get any variation, with any aircraft for that matter between min fuel and "no optimisation". Can anyone else confirm this? Especially with the default 747 RR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 422 Posted August 25, 2019 Share Posted August 25, 2019 Hello Rudy, I was planning the QFA9 Perth-London route for a friend and tried all four options in the aircraft selection box for each route find resulting in the following fuel load; No optimization: 90865kg Min Cost: 90167kg Min Fuel: 90167kg Min Time: 97267kg The no optimization option resulted in a different route to the other three. Min Fuel/Cost resulted in the same fuel load in this example as there is unlikely any benefit in routing through different airspace or I don't have the required data in PFPX. The profiles were similar also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.