APbjoern 2 Posted May 17, 2019 Share Posted May 17, 2019 Hi, even with lowest scenery settings with the tool my frames are down to 12 FPS. Any idea? tnx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jude 190 Posted May 17, 2019 Share Posted May 17, 2019 What is your spec? Logfile might be useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APbjoern 2 Posted May 17, 2019 Author Share Posted May 17, 2019 Log.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jude 190 Posted May 17, 2019 Share Posted May 17, 2019 Hi, I have the same CPU, but overclocked to 4.6 Ghz, and my GPU is the 1070 with 8GB RAM. It might help to try overclocking your CPU, but you also might be approaching the limit for your graphics card too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APbjoern 2 Posted May 18, 2019 Author Share Posted May 18, 2019 @Jude my CPU is overclocket to 4.4 GhZ, flying many addons in XP but no situation with that result on FPS like this airport here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jude 190 Posted May 18, 2019 Share Posted May 18, 2019 The requirements recommend an 8GB graphic card. What is your X-Plane settings? Have you also tried the 3jfps script https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/files/file/43281-3jfps-wizard11/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APbjoern 2 Posted May 18, 2019 Author Share Posted May 18, 2019 GPU: 1 GB VRAM, DirectX 11 is the reqierement not 8GB my friend...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Heinz Flichtbeil 1609 Posted May 19, 2019 Administrator Share Posted May 19, 2019 Hello, I cannot recreate it here. I have a GTX 1080 (8GB) and I have better Framerate with our payware Köln Bonn as with payware Frankfurt XP (EDDF) for example. With Köln Bonn here between 30 and 44 FPS (depends on the aircraft used) without any changes done with the settings tool. There must be another problem. You (APbjoern) are using an older GTX 980 but so big differences are a little bit strange I think... But you are using many Plugins: ASXPConnect, AutoGate, AviTab, BetterPushback, DataRefEditor, FlyWithLua (Scipts? ...), Gizmo, GndHandling, HeadShake, SPAD.neXt, TerrainRadar, UltraWeatherXP2.5, WorldTraffic, WorldTrafficRadar, X-ATC-Chatter, X-Camera, LibRain, ... Also X-Europe and many Ortho texures are installed. And you are using many AI-Aircrafts. About 20 if I read the Log.txt correct... May be this all is a problem (RAM and VideoRAM). I think the GTX980 has 4 GB or lower VideoRAM. Greets Heinz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jude 190 Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 X-Plane uses OpenGL, not DirectX. The new Vulan API might help with your framerate, but take the advise of Heinz, and remove (delete from the plugins folder) some of your plugins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APbjoern 2 Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 @Heinz Flichtbeil did all of that u suggested with no success. yes, GTX980 has only 4GB but I do not have any issue with massive addons like ORBX True Earth GB / Aerosoft London. I assume, the moving doors and passengers are impacting. Any option to disable those? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Heinz Flichtbeil 1609 Posted May 20, 2019 Administrator Share Posted May 20, 2019 Hello Bjoern, that is strange, because I have tested with the big Frankfurt XP Airport, Berlin, HDMesh V4.... No difference in Frames with Köln Bonn. What do you have done exactly with your installation? Can you send the new Log.txt to us here. Delete at first the Log.txt from the installed X-Plane 11 folder. Then start X-Plane 11, load Köln Bonn and close X-Plane 11. Then send the new Log.txt file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer FlyAgi 396 Posted May 20, 2019 Developer Share Posted May 20, 2019 vor 3 Stunden , Heinz Flichtbeil sagte: No difference in Frames with Köln Bonn. Some users told me EDDK is GPU heavy when the aircraft is close to the terminal or standing directly in front of it - otherwise they got normal FPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Heinz Flichtbeil 1609 Posted May 21, 2019 Administrator Share Posted May 21, 2019 Hello FlyAgi, ok, I have tested it also because of APbjoerns text (passengers...). But with my system there are only about 4 - 5 FPS difference. For example: B12 = 31 FPS and A11 = 35 FPS. But I think, that depends on the Hardware used. I use a i7 6700K (32GB) and a GTX1080 (8GB). I think, I send an Info to our prod.-Manager. I don't know if you can disable the passengers in the terminal... and also the moving people... Greets Heinz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APbjoern 2 Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 @Heinz Flichtbeil thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer FlyAgi 396 Posted May 22, 2019 Developer Share Posted May 22, 2019 vor 16 Stunden , Heinz Flichtbeil sagte: But with my system there are only about 4 - 5 FPS difference. For example: B12 = 31 FPS and A11 = 35 FPS. But I think, that depends on the Hardware used. I use a i7 6700K (32GB) and a GTX1080 (8GB). Well... as I don't own the new EDDK I can't test myself but this is what I was told by two experienced users with pretty powerful systems (compared to my own specs), one of the graphics cards was a GTX 1070 which is close to a 1080 so this possibly depends on other settings or addons bringing the gpu to its limits even without EDDK and if you add some more load the FPS suffer (the grass definitively has some impact on an airport this large). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jude 190 Posted May 22, 2019 Share Posted May 22, 2019 I used the default settings for EDDK with a 1070 With VR, I'm gettings 23 fps using Zibo 737 There is a configurator described in the documentation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APbjoern 2 Posted May 22, 2019 Author Share Posted May 22, 2019 today I changed my GTX980 to the GTX 1070 ti. Same result, 15- maximum 21 FPF lowest setting on stand D12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Heinz Flichtbeil 1609 Posted May 22, 2019 Administrator Share Posted May 22, 2019 Hello APbjoern, that is strange. There must be another problem. This must work. With my GTX 1080 (about the same performance than the 1070 Ti) i have on Stand D12 about 35 FPS. And that with high settings with the X-Plane 11 grafics Menu. See screenshot. How are your settings? With the EDDK Tool and important with your X-Plane 11 - Settings- Grafic Menu. Also your installed Plugins, AI-Aircrafts ... are important to know.... Antivir program active? Will this check also the X-Plane 11 folders at realtime? This can be also the reason for framerate problems. You have build in a new grafic card 1070 Ti. So please reset your preferences. And please delete the shadercache (X-Plane 11 not running!): Goto ...x-plane 11 folder.../Output/shadercache. There delete the included folder. Its a folder with a name like this "f1c26bbcfe...." And please send us your actual Log.txt if you want as an attachement. Delete the old Log.txt , then start X-Plane 11 with your settings, load EDDK... then close X-Plane 11 with the menu. Then send the new Log.txt .... Greets Heinz Please login to display this image. Please login to display this image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APbjoern 2 Posted May 23, 2019 Author Share Posted May 23, 2019 @Jan Depenbusch @Heinz Flichtbeil due to cange of my GPU GTX980 to GTX1070ti and shadercash refreshment, I do reach 20-40 FPT in average. see log as well tnx Log.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartson 3 Posted May 23, 2019 Share Posted May 23, 2019 I'm running a lower spec PC (e.g. 1060) and the frame rates have been pretty good (25-30) given the complexity However the scenery does take a minute or so to settle when you load it up. Initial frame rates are very low. Again, as is seeming becoming the norm it's a huge download. The documentation I think is poor. In the past sceneries haven't had a huge level of complexity and therefore the documentation hasn't always been critical. In this case between the orthos, the seasons and the configuration tool there are a lot of variables in the set up. Personally I think it could have been made a lot clearer. Generally on performance issues once you have the basic game settings and then add to it performance for the scenery life can get complex. For some the challenge of getting the right balance will be interesting, for others it could be less enthralling. One other issue is the large numbers of marshallers touting for business at ever empty gate (in the cargo area in places it looks like a dance party) which looks anything but realistic. If there's a setting to thin them out I've yet to find it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jude 190 Posted May 24, 2019 Share Posted May 24, 2019 That's good news. X-Plane 11 is more graphic hungry than X-Plane 10 was, so I would say that 4GB RAM is not really enough anymore. My 1070 usually shows 6GB RAM in use (With VR). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.