Developer metzgergva 210 Posted February 19, 2019 Developer Share Posted February 19, 2019 Hi, I ran into an issue at EDDK of having installed FSaerodata to provide actual nav data for the G1000 in the Diamond DA62 by Vertx. As EDDK is using the new P3D installation routine it is automatically at a higher priority than the FSaerodata files. EDDK contains an ADE file which unfortunately only contains the default Nav data which are incorrect and contain no approches nor departures. Deactivating this ADE file brings back the FSaerodata as per attached images but of course ruins all stand positions. Could you provide and update that includes the actual nav data for EDDK. Thank you for looking into this and hopefully provide a solution. Please login to display this image. Please login to display this image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer Hans Hartmann 3694 Posted February 19, 2019 Developer Share Posted February 19, 2019 You should be able to change the priorities since P3D 4.4. That was one of the new features if I remember correctly. Or simply add the FSaerodata stuff via add-ons.cfg. If I understand you right and they store their navdata as a scenery, it should be easy to create an add-on.xml file and add it to the scenery library the new way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer metzgergva 210 Posted February 20, 2019 Author Developer Share Posted February 20, 2019 In P3D v4.4 I cannot move the senery entries installed via add-on.xml. So I tried to develop an add-on.xml (see attachment) and put it into the FSaerodata folder. P3D asked me to install FSaerodata, but the 4 scenery elements did not show up in the scenery listing. So I made something wrong here... I think the best way would be to ask the developer of EDDK if he could update his ADE file with all procedures for the airport. Then they would show up in the default GPS as it is done with many aerosoft airports I checked. And a sophisticated G1000 simulation based on default plus FSaerodata would see them too. add-on.xml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs mopperle 4161 Posted February 20, 2019 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted February 20, 2019 While airport addons have some navaids inlcuded I'm not aware of any addon having procedures included. That's why you have dataproviders like NavdataPro (Lido) or Navigraph (Jepessen). So I highly doubt that it will be done for EDDK. And with tools like the Lorby_SI Organizer you can also move entries installed via add-on.xml. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer metzgergva 210 Posted February 20, 2019 Author Developer Share Posted February 20, 2019 I understand the tools but that should not be needed for a standard installation. I have no issues with otjer airports like LEMD whixh is also in the upper grey area. It is oarticulsrily EDDK which rolls back to old default and it goes away when deleting the ADE file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted February 20, 2019 Aerosoft Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 hour ago, mopperle said: While airport addons have some navaids inlcuded I'm not aware of any addon having procedures included. That's why you have dataproviders like NavdataPro (Lido) or Navigraph (Jepessen). So I highly doubt that it will be done for EDDK. And with tools like the Lorby_SI Organizer you can also move entries installed via add-on.xml. According to Hans it IS possible that a scenery contains procedures so the AI traffic can fly it. Trying to get to the bottom of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveCT2003 2553 Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Mathijs Kok said: According to Hans it IS possible that a scenery contains procedures so the AI traffic can fly it. Trying to get to the bottom of this. That is VERY interesting! I thought AI Aircraft only followed the Traffic.bgls, so this is really neat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted February 20, 2019 Aerosoft Share Posted February 20, 2019 I asked Jo to take a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer Jo Erlend 2116 Posted February 20, 2019 Developer Share Posted February 20, 2019 Hi, The issue will be addressed in the next update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
data63 421 Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 vor 5 Stunden , DaveCT2003 sagte: That is VERY interesting! I thought AI Aircraft only followed the Traffic.bgls, so this is really neat! it's not the complete procedures (SID/STAR) but only the approaches (in some way...) There was a freeware "AI Controller" that "took over" the AI some dozens of mile before the airport and made them follow SID/STAR's but it seems to be abandoned and it used navdata converted from the PMDG format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted February 21, 2019 Aerosoft Share Posted February 21, 2019 There is now an update available via the Updater tool that addresses this issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs masterhawk 799 Posted February 23, 2019 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted February 23, 2019 Best solution would be if you ask fsaerodata to add their addon via add-on.xml or you will run with another addon into the same problem. I added it via add-on.xml myself. Will later upload the file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs masterhawk 799 Posted February 24, 2019 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted February 24, 2019 Attached my add-on.xml for fsaerodata. I use a high layer number, so it is always highest prio in sim. add-on.xml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.