Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 When I bought Dublin for FSX it had many advanced features that made it a very attractive package. Clearly an awful lot of work had been put in by the developer. So it seems an awful waste of effort that the airport cannot be converted to work seamlessly with P3D v4. The underlying simulator - ESP - is the same for both FSX and P3D. So why wouldn't it be a relatively quick job to convert the scenery? A few years ago I bought Thessaloniki and the author / Aerosoft has provided a version that is 100% compatible with P3D v4. That is very much appreciated especially with no extra charge. My question is this. Do Aerosoft rely on the author of their airports to provide updates without any pressure or do you request authors to provide updates? I appreciate you have a huge amount of products but from a customer point of view it is disappointing to lose an airport that with a relatively small amount of effort could be made compatible. It benefits the author and Aerosoft too because new P3D customers can then buy the product. To have so many not available for P3D v4 is very disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs Herman 1591 Posted January 4, 2019 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted January 4, 2019 There's no change since this thread last summer. To your other point, it's up to the author whether he/she/it wants to do it and if there'll be a charge. Aerosoft can only suggest, and there's every reason to believe that's happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Proudfoot 231 Posted January 4, 2019 Author Share Posted January 4, 2019 With respect Herman there’s no definitive statement in the linked thread or answer to my very specific question. Only Mathijs or the developer of Dublin can answer and in all probability it’s going to be Mathijs. I wouldn’t have a problem with a modest charge for the update. What I’m trying to establish is how these P3D v4 updates get started. I would have thought it would be in both the developer’s and Aerosoft’s interest for the product not to effectively die with FSX when there’s a huge P3D customer base waiting and probably willing to pay a modest fee for a compatible version. P3D is here for the long term. We need quality airports like Dublin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs Herman 1591 Posted January 4, 2019 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted January 4, 2019 That's fine Ray. Simply trying to get you the most recent on this scenery from Aerosoft. I'd be surprised though to see a difference in Mathijs' fourth answer to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
data63 421 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 vor 15 Stunden , Ray Proudfoot sagte: When I bought Dublin for FSX it had many advanced features that made it a very attractive package. Clearly an awful lot of work had been put in by the developer. So it seems an awful waste of effort that the airport cannot be converted to work seamlessly with P3D v4. The underlying simulator - ESP - is the same for both FSX and P3D. So why wouldn't it be a relatively quick job to convert the scenery? you may - in parts - answered your question by youselve. EIDW had many advanced features in FSX, most of the time that means the dev programmed at the edge of the SDK (or slighly over it.. - in the first versions there where a lot of problems as far as I remember the forum in that time) At the same tme - yes FSX and P3D share the same ancestor, but P3D v4 is 64bit and broke with many old FSX compatibilies to allow new features, so there may be no "easy way" to just recompile the old sources (I bet if it where "easy" AS and the dev would grap that money) As another point there where lot's of changes in EIDW since the FSX release and I can hear the laments of a 2018 released (updated) scenery not reflecting the current situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted January 5, 2019 Aerosoft Share Posted January 5, 2019 At this moment we have no news on a possible new version. We can only handle a number of projects at any given time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted January 5, 2019 Aerosoft Share Posted January 5, 2019 Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.