hsors 4 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Gentlemen, Downloaded new released cycle 1611 for PMDG and X-Plane this morning. From a few differences I was aware off from AIPs, seems nothing changed and 1611 is strictly identical to previous one (1610) both for PMDG and X-Plane data Is it a cache problem I could have on my NavDataPro (1.0.3.4) installer (although it is stipulated update installation overwrite existing NAV-data) or another (server) problem on your side? Thanks for the support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted October 13, 2016 Aerosoft Share Posted October 13, 2016 I'll ask the project manager to check on it. Anybody else can also noticed this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Sheriffs Tom A320 4915 Posted October 13, 2016 Deputy Sheriffs Share Posted October 13, 2016 1 hour ago, hsors said: seems nothing changed and 1611 is strictly identical to previous one (1610) How have you done the compare? Have you used a file compare tool which is capable of a compare on binary level? As I use Navigraph, so I can't check NavDataPro myself. In Navigraph the files are definitely not identical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsors 4 Posted October 13, 2016 Author Share Posted October 13, 2016 Yes that's finally what I've done since I had some doubts looking at the data (and I always keep a copy of the previous cycle data for security) For x-plane earth_nav_dat file: header 810 Version - Aerosoft NavDataPro AIRAC cycle : 1610 Revision : 1 Valid (from/to): 15/SEP/2016 - 12/OCT/2016 length: 2 173 247 bytes 810 Version - Aerosoft NavDataPro AIRAC cycle : 1611 Revision : 1 Valid (from/to): 13/OCT/2016 - 09/NOV/2016 length: 2 173 247 bytes and identical on a text editor compare tool Same for PMDG files That's for NavDataPro (we are on their forum) So, sure there is a problem..I presume everybody can see (at least if you have copies of the previous cycle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Guenter Zehnel 77 Posted October 14, 2016 Administrator Share Posted October 14, 2016 Hello, we used the navdat as we got them from our provider. However, we will check it again. best regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan-Paul Schuchna 24 Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Hi, indeed its true, 1611 is actually 1610. Made some cross checks with procedures that should have changed. Regards Jan-Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Guenter Zehnel 77 Posted October 17, 2016 Administrator Share Posted October 17, 2016 Hello, we are just checking where the problem was. We will offer a new cycle release soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Guenter Zehnel 77 Posted October 18, 2016 Administrator Share Posted October 18, 2016 Hello, we are just released revision 2 of cycle 1611. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 83 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 I just installed the 1611 v2 cycle, however all installs are still marked with v1 and the "exclamation mark". The downloads in the NavDataPro directory are apparently v2, but the NavDataPro UI shows still v1 (and all cycle-info files are also still showing v1, hence the v1 indication in the UI). Please check again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Guenter Zehnel 77 Posted October 18, 2016 Administrator Share Posted October 18, 2016 Hello Oskar, sorry again, but now it should work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 83 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Hi Günter, Thanks for your efforts. Now checked and all ok. Have a nice evening ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.