Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by keenrw

  1. It's one of these bugs which is very hard to track down sadly which i guess is why no fix has been found, ..... I had it a few time the other day, a workaround i use is to go to selected speed then using the MCDU go direct to the next fix (even the one you are already doing to) using the DIR function then I find i can get back into managed speed mode. Rich
  2. Does this mean we will be seeing less and fewer updates/bug fixes for the Airbus in P3D? This is a little upsetting if its true as P3D (as well as Xplane) is my sim of choice atm, … I tried MSFS and although the graphics are fantastic the flight models and performance in some areas not so,..so i have gone back to P3D and Xplane ,as a long time Aerosoft Airbus user this news is upsetting... i may have to bite the bullet and save for the completers Airbus. Rich
  3. Im not sure to be honest, but this issue hasn't shown up since and I've done about 5 flights after that one so im at a loss as to what it could have been.
  4. Quick update, just completed my first flight into Aerosofts LSGG with the above file disabled while leaving the Autogen and Scenery draw distance slider set to High (get a CTD with that setting normally) and I was able to do the full STAR, Approach and Land on runway 22 without any issues so for me at least i can confirm that renaming the Orbx Land Class file fixes the CTD issue, it's a temp fix at least..... I have not done a flight into the default LSGG with that file enabled. So the Issue looks like It's ... 1) An Issue with that one Orbx file, Which hopefully will get fixed 2) That Orbx file is conflicting with Aerosofts LSGG causing on some users PC a CTD Rich
  5. Looks like this is an Orbx Land class issue and not Aerosofts LSGG ... have a look at this thread over at Orbx .... appears to be related to this file …OLC_EU_REG_L_French.bgl file. https://orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/207596-openlc-europe-terraindll/
  6. 2nd flight done, exactly same weights and route ... this time no issues with the TOC/TOD predictions... so I'm at a loss as to what could have caused my above issue, but i will keep an eye on it for future flights just in case.
  7. Sadly, i just finished the flight before i saw your post , i will try and do the flight again for you in the next few hours to see if it happens again
  8. Hi first flight with the new update for the A320 in P3D5.2 .. i noticed some odd TOC estimations during a flight from EGPH to EGKK GOSAM P600 FENIK UL612 DCS UN864 SUBUK KEPAD L151 DISIT at FL310 ZFW 60.8 fuel 6.0 Thanks Rich
  9. Hi Aerosoft team hope you are all well, firstly thanks for the new updates and looking forward to trying them out .... now I understand that they are new builds so will need a full uninstallation and reinstall but I just wondered what the best way to go about it is?... i normally install a new build or update then re boot but as i have the full range of A318-A330 in both V4 and V5 this can get time-consuming...for future reference would it be fine to install all of them than do one reboot after or is it still best to reboot after each and every install (how i did it)? Thanks, Rich
  10. I have just done two flights in the A320 using V5.2 ... no issues that i saw,… Although to be fair the Aerosofts Airbuses have always worked with each new P3D interim versions
  11. Doing a flight to Gatwick now .. My mate is in front .. I'm at FL400 he's 4000 feet below me and there is another flight 5000 feet below me, but they are showing -39 and -49
  12. Hi I have noticed that the TCAS targets can be 100feet below the correct Alt … For example .. im flying to LEPA ..a friend of mine is behind me ... im at FL400 in the Aerosoft A330, and he is at FL380 in the FSLABs A320 ... .. On my ND he is showing -19 not 20 as i would expect… On his ND its showing me at the correct +20 above him. Thanks Rich
  13. Just wondering if there are plans on a new update for the Airbus series soon? Thanks Rich
  14. Hi Aerosoft Can i draw your attention to this post on the Fs2CREW forum please as i have an issue .. IM not sure if it's your Airbus or FS2CREWs new V4.2 update ... all i know is i do not get it when i don't use FS2CREW and never had an issue with the last 4.1... im using the Button version of FS2CREW and the lasted A320 update .. Sorry not tried the other Airbus versions . https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/597394-new-update-issue/ Thanks Rich
  15. What do you have for your Autogen and scenery draw distance slider?.. Me and a mate found that setting this one slider to Medium helps if we fly into LSGG, and we have not had a CTD since when we fly there..even routing overhead SOVAD, regarding flying online you still can … Ask the controller via PM if you can avoid SOVAD due to a CTD issue and im sure he will be ok with it, in fact you will more than likely get radar vectored off the STAR anyway. Rich
  16. If I don't insert the Transition then up to WILLO it's fine with a disco after WILLO, that's how i had to fly it tonight for the Gatwick event on Vatsim , the issue as you say seems to be how the Airbus reads the data from WILLO with a left turn to D114V it just draws a direct too which is wrong, i use Navigraph for all my add-ons, and they fly that part fine bar the Aerosoft Airbus, saying that i sometimes use an A321 in Xplane from another developer and that has issues with that part as well.. and will miss WILLO out completely (at least the Aerosoft Airbus gets to WILLO lol ) ... Just wondered if anyone from Aerosoft can fly this using Navigraph and confirm the issue please ... DISIT or KIDLI 1G STAR then put in the 26L transition from WILLO. Thanks Rich
  17. Quick pic on how it should be drawn on the ND
  18. The Airbus as a slight issue in drawing the Transition from WILLO to 26L at EGKK ... after HOLLY it should route WILLO then left turn to D114Y then dct to MAY but as you can see it's not doing it and has drawn it wrong, its drawn the track from HOLLY to WILLO parallel then its turned left to WILLO then dct to D114V ... the left-hand curve should be after WILLO and should not be parallel to it Was using the latest Airbus A320 update and an up to date Navigraph data set...... an easy test... use the DISIT or KIDLI 1G STAR and select the Transition from WILLO for 26L Thanks, Rich
  19. Im sorry to report that with EA on from the start the 319 still looks fine, i even went through all levels of Anti Aliasing just to see if that made any change but nope ...... as far as what can cause it on your PC im out of ideas now, have you deleted your shader folder just to check if its a shader issue? Rich
  20. OK give me a few secs i will load up P3D with EA on then load up the Airbus just to test and post the result
  21. Before i posted my pic above i did turn on EA just to see if that made any difference, but it still looked normal to me... I don't use any 3rd party shaders if that helps
  22. Sadly I don't see this striped paint effect in V5 with the latest HF installed, ... this repaint is from the Aerosoft download site. All I did have to do was remove the VC file as the shadows looked odd in the VC so it's using the default VC textures, it displays fine on the outside, but it may look a little dull due to the refection issues as noticed above, I've come to live with it thou and turn off dynamic refections. Rich
  • Create New...