Recently we have seen a lot of codes used to unlock our products being offered for discounted prices. Almost all of them are bought using stolen credit cards. These codes will all be blocked by our systems and you will have to try to get your money back from the seller, we are unable to assist in these matters. Do be very careful when you see a deal that is almost too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.

Jump to content

2302ts

members
  • Content Count

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About 2302ts

  • Rank
    R. S.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hello, could you please do something like this for the A320 professional? Would be great!
  2. Just wanted to report the same porblem, unable to release a flight. Found the NOTAM-Checkbox solution in here and it works for me as well, thanks for the heads up!
  3. Thanks for your reply I'm aware of the fact that a larger screen with the same resolution means less pixel per inch; I just wanted to get feedback from guys using a 27" at 1920x1080, (or have used both a 24" and a 27") how they like it, if you will. My choice is the Samsung C24FG73 or its larger brother, the C27FG73; my understanding is that they use the same panel and differ in size only.
  4. Hey there! I'm about to upgrade from my old 22" monitor to a larger one and wanted to ask for your recommendations. After long considerations my choice comes down to FullHD (1920x1080), either 24" or 27". Anything larger simply doesn't fit on my curent desk, any higher resolution I feel would simply put to much strain on my current hardware. Now, I would lean towards the 27", but have heard it said that FullHD on 27" is already somewhat grainy. I have been running my 22" with a 1680x1050 resolution. What are your experiences with FullHD on 24" or 27" screens, what are your preferences? Any input is highly appreciated Tanks, Raffael
  5. Too bad, but thanks for the fast reply
  6. I see, thanks for the clarification :)
  7. Dear Aerosoft-Team, just wanted to ask if there are any news as to FS Flight Keeper getting an update for P3Dv4 compatibility? Thanks, Raffael
  8. Hey guys, Austrian repaints for the 330-200 would be great, old colors and very old colors eg OE-LAM, OE-LAN https://www.planespotters.net/photo/331555/oe-lam-austrian-airlines-airbus-a330-223 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:117aa_-_Austrian_Airlines_Airbus_A330-223,_OE-LAN@ZRH,17.11.2000_-_Flickr_-_Aero_Icarus.jpg
  9. Hi there, could someone point me towards a manual or a tutorial where the HUD/HGS of the CRJ is covered? Can't seem to find it in the docs, and a forum search just came up with bug reports. A "how to use the HUD" would be very helpful Thanks!
  10. I also second that. I have used FK for a long time and logged quite a few flights with it. What's more, I simply didn't come across a real alternative logging software yet... of the available things I know of nothing comes close. For example, none of the other programs can log sim times (only real world utc). In short - FSFK ftw! Would gladly pay for an updated P3D version (could even be less bloaty)
  11. According to this post by Mathijs there is at least some communication with the developer of FSFK going on :-) Is there anything you guys can tell us about the status or future of FSFK (in limbo, might get worked on, is being worked on...)? Anything would be greatly appreciated.... love FSFK! Best regards Raffael
  12. I would also love to see an updated version of FSFK, I would pay for it. FSFK has been the one and only addon that I used for every flight since it came out. Like flight4 I am interested in the logging functionality "only" (times!, fuel weights, flightpath). It doesn't have to have all the details logged (like ADF1, 2 and 3 frequencies, oil quantity...), and things like AirTV or the map gauge I never used. So basically a slim version of FSFK for P3D would be much much much loved
  13. Liebes aerosoft-Team, nach längerer Zeit hab ich die GAP3 (3.10) wieder installiert. Leider fehlen die Texturen "zwischen" den Rollwegen und Landebahnen. Sieht so aus: In EDDT sieht interessanterweise alles normal aus: Wäre dankbar für Ideen zur Behebung dieses Problems Dankeschön, R. Schmidt PS: Im Downloadshop unter den Supporteinträgen zu GAP3 gibt es einen link zu einer terrain.cfg datei, der nicht (mehr) funktioniert. Der Link sollte aktualisiert werden. Dank eines anderen Users habe ich die "neue" terrain.cfg hier im Forum bereits gefunden, diese behebt das Problem aber leider nicht. Weiters läßt sich das Update auf 3.2 nicht installieren, verabschiedet sich mit folgender Fehlermeldung:
×
×
  • Create New...