Jump to content

EasternT3

Members
  • Posts

    351
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by EasternT3

  1. Although I don't see a PMDG aircraft stopping the release of an Aerosoft Airport, I would agree EBBR isn't within an immediate release timeframe, based of Mathijs's "not far off" I still think EBBR is probably 3-6 weeks off
  2. I agree with LFPG, we need a good CDG, (MSFS already has a LEBL that does the job, I would rather companies focus on airports not on the market, rather than re-doing airports, unless they have a contract as Mathijs was talking about the other day)
  3. Also it's been stated and I can confirm, detail like this doesn't have a noticeable performance hit even in low-mid range PCs. So have an extra detail while keeping performance is a good thing imo.
  4. I’m sorry I didn’t take your Wednesday’s thread into account when writing my response, I thought your vacation quip was about your post 11 hours earlier which my point is still valid about the weekend and overnight, however the same sort of thing applies to your Wednesday thread. I say that because you started the thread at 06:06 PM on Wednesday evening and by 0930 AM Thursday morning you announced the issue had sorted itself, potentially (and this is my guess) I think the Aerosoft team would have logged on Thursday morning and saw a new issue but then saw it was fixed so therefore felt it wasn’t needing an official response and closing the thread was inevitable as that’s how AS track issues. I’ve noticed from other support queries that most of the support comes from the people that worked on the CRJ so certain deputy sheriffs may not have the right knowledge to assist. Sorry again for not taking the full situation into account, hopefully you get it sorted ASAP, with it being Saturday if you don’t hear anything today or tomorrow, hopefully @Mathijs Kok or @Hans Hartmann will see this on Monday
  5. No, it's called the weekend and even though Aerosoft do sometimes post stuff at the weekend you can't automatically expect it, and secondly you posted 11 hours ago, Aerosoft is a German company which means in the 11 hours since your first post, it has been night time in Europe and people will have been in bed
  6. That'll keep us busy for a while! and as always the progress looks amazing
  7. I second LFPG and LFLL for MSFS, not sure about the others as we already have LEBL, and the other 2 are already in the works
  8. Having spent my entire flight sim career flying mostly FMC aircraft I can't disagree with you (well I didn't take screenshots ), that being said now I am older and MSFS in perfect for lower altitude flying, I am defiantly going to do a lot more older-school flying with the twotter/DC6/any older school aircraft that may come our way.
  9. Ari, for the record, there's numerous articles stating Majestic are working on the 100/200/300 series, albeit they are currently not focused on them whilst they evaluated the newer MSFS platform, although this was as of 2020, which I think they are now developing for. That being said we are on Aerosoft's forum, and more specifically, the twin otter, so it's not fair to Aerosoft to detract from the twin otter by talking about another dev. If you think Majestic won't come through on their word that they will create the 100-300, then I suggest posting on the thread below, requesting that Aerosoft think about developing it.
  10. I'm sure the last Mathijs said was he hopes/has planned one of the airbuses for late 2021, but it's software development so could always change
  11. I think you're right. based off FSX and P3D the A320/A321 came before the A318/A319
  12. I think the majority prefer short to mid over long hauls, I do like a good long haul (I get more jobs/work done in the cruise ) I am desperate for a long hauler in MSFS, so much so I would pay a 500% price increase for it now. Hopefully we see the A330 or another long hauler sooner rather than later
  13. Mathijs has already said he's got one planned for released at the end of the year. But that could always change depending what happens.
  14. I can on see one other payware for Hamburg? flight simulator is like any other market where competition drives down prices otherwise airports would be a lot more expensive, plus different developers offer different levels of detail/better quality for money etc. Another thing to bear in mind is airports like these take months/years to build, and are not announced until release/quite far on, therefore developer A and B could have started work at the same time and don't know that each other are on the same project until one is announced by which point in 99% of cases, it makes more financial sense for both projects to continue
  15. The answer is on the bottom of the last page, quote "Release is more or less linked to some simupdates as we do need a better turbine and propeller model."
  16. (sorry for speaking english in a german thread, I can read German but still learning to write it ). I'm having a lot of CTDs, for aerosoft's products, is it just the CRJ that has WASM modules or do airports have them as well?
  17. That’s really great to hear, hopefully that continues for the 900/1000, Airbuses and Otter, I for one will buy everything you guys release
  18. Hopefully we may see see an event now and again specifically in favour of the CRJ
  19. Sorry, what I meant was there’s nowhere near the amount of CRJ’s (and operators) to be comparable against the A320 of 737NG families (and operators), also for example with COVID the statistics from Fllghtaware are more favourably to the CRJ, for example what I noticed on flightradar24 is during COVID, US domestic travel hasn’t really declined compared to Europe it’s basically now 20% of what it was before, here in the UK it’s pretty deserted and easyjet/Ryanair alone have basically there entire fleets grounded, which they have 500+ A320s and 737s between them thus if they were airborne the 1 CRJ for 5 A320/737 would become 1 for 15 etc, but yes there’s definitely more opportunities for the A320 and 737 etc Also to note is Europe has a different network to NA and we have don’t have the regional airports the US have so for example in the UK we have Doncaster Sheffield airport which is probably the same size as Burbank (Burbank may even be bigger in some aspects) yet Burbank only has the major airports as destinations where from Doncaster you can fly to a lot of the same destinations as Gatwick for example. Therefore regional jets are not as common in Europe compared to the US. Sorry if I sound argumentative, I’m not trying to be at all. I just mean there’s a lot of factors to answer the OP’s question, one being the time of day, like if you were to log onto VATSIM at 1900z most traffic would be in Europe and therefore not many CRJs, but if you log on at 0300z the traffic will have shifted to the US and you’re more likely to see CRJs
  20. I'm sure if they could they would, re-reading what Mathijs said and the way I see it, the issue is they haven't found official data for the CRJ takeoff and landing speeds for airports over 6000ft. therefore if they could make the EFB work for higher airports, it would give the wrong speeds and that's where issues happen
  21. Personally I see a few on VATSIM every time I'm on, like today I did 4 sectors in the CRJ7 and bumped into 4 or 5 other CRJs. Another thing is the CRJ is not commonly used in the real world and I have seen over many years that VATSIM tends to mirror this, what I mean is the majority of people on VATSIM use the A320 and 737 as they are the most common types/there's a lot more routes possible followed by the 747/777/A330 and jump into the CRJ/DH8D adhoc for a change of pace, and when a new aircraft is released everyone flies that then after a week it falls into the same pattern.
  22. I've just had a voiceattack as i've not heard of it but it looks like you can only add voice commands like gear up etc, where FS2Crew is custom built for each aircraft and basically you have a virtual First Officer next to you who does all everything a first officer would do irl, and then reads out checklists for you to respond to (if you have the voice control edition), FS2Crew adds a multi-crew expirience
  23. Just to clear my first post up, I should have put now the 550/700 is out, Bryan said as of yesterday "FS2Crew for the Aerosoft CRJ (MSFS – Voice and Button control): Working on it! Expect full integration and a true CRJ crew simulation" from the looks of it they're trying to get the FBW A32NX out first
  24. No, Bryan (FS2Crew) said he we waiting for the CRJ to release to finish to project, it's still going on. He posts weekly updates on Saturdays over at Avsim
×
×
  • Create New...