Jump to content

EasternT3

Members
  • Posts

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About EasternT3

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

EasternT3's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

309

Reputation

  1. It is, (I've posted on that thread a couple times), it's very similar to a bug that was in FSX, I think although the temp is an issue, there's a wider issue with the weather system as a whole, as I noticed QNHs are off too
  2. I only noticed it starting yesterday, and only flown the 320nx yesterday and today and is massively affected, i.e 0 rate of climb/no ability to increase speed, hopefully asobo fixes the issue soon,
  3. According to Asobo, they should be improving turboprop engine logic, over SU5, 6 and 7
  4. Another idea, are you using real weather, if so there's an issue with it today where as you climb the OAT rises instead of decreases (reminds me of the FSX bug), although this issue is noticed right from take-off, well for me anyway
  5. Jarred's point does some the situation up, however to add a few points, MSFS is not exclusively, CTRL E pilots, people like me who have been around since FS2002 and even earlier have made the transition (although my situation is a bit different). Also the reason for the low quality products is the time it takes AS/PMDG/A2A to develop for a new sim, and you have devs taking advantages of the market as much as they can before the proper addons arrive. I agree about the FBW32NX, not being amazing but is a tie-over until AS/Fenix get their A320s in sim and personally is a load better than the default but has a hell of a lot more work needed. The sim is capable of good aircraft already, as seen with the CRJ, DC6 and JF PA28s, MSFS as it stands will have all 3 PMDG jets in sim by Q2 2022, and QW/A2A/JF etc and new devs like Fenix are solely focusing on MSFS. Jarred's final 2 lines sum it up beautifully. MSFS is looking extremely likely to be the future but doesn't mean you have to change, but can't expect developments for platforms that are not viable.
  6. Jori, you have a wildly misconception of how the current swimming world is. Firstly if people leave MSFS the user base will still be higher than P3D ever was, a lot of hardcore simmers have already transitioned to MSFS, also it's been out 1 year...if the sim had any chance of dying, it would have already done, how do you know P3D will always be here, where's the guarantee? Don't forget P3D is a COMMERCIAL sim that was abused by many over the years and overlooked by LM, all it takes is LM for v6 (if there is one) to stop selling academic licences and it's no longer a sim for the general public. Also it's not just Aerosoft who are no longer developing for P3D, many other dev's are leaving P3D for MSFS. Aerosoft know what's happening, they didn't make the jump on a whim, they've been in business over 20 years, so they know what they are doing. You sure? Mathijs/Aerosoft doesn't think so, go look at other forums/fselite etc and look at how many hardcore P3D users are going, "I'm still using P3D but not spending anymore money, once the equivalent add ons are in MSFS, I'm uninstalling P3D". Look, use any sim you want, but don't be mad because the market isn't in your favour and is very much unlikely to change
  7. Maybe Mathijs can confirm but I read this as it's more than just icing issues
  8. Hi. That's, as you said, the default Ibiza, I'm not that great at support, but as you say, try re-installing it, hopefully that works,
  9. Looking good, things like these defiantly make it easier to buy/install/maintain products
  10. I can concur I have Ibiza and it's perfect, looks exactly like the screenshots, sounds like a file may have corrupted, as mopperle says screenshots will help, I have run Ibiza at both Medium and Ultra settings and obviously get better results on Ultra, but medium worked fine. Another idea is you may have a conflicting mod in your community folder, have you tried loading Ibiza with only that in your community folder Just a fyi, Heathrow is a handcrafted airport by Asobo so that's why it looks better than the other default airports, but still needs a big upgrade tbh to be the best it could be.
  11. I can concur with this, I have/had both for P3D (AS and FSL). And it be the same in MSFS should Fenix reach the market, as it currently stands the Aerosoft Airbus’s will have one major advantage on Fenix, the fact Aerosoft’s will have all 4 A320 family models (yes Fenix could have at some point as well) Is there a reason that can be said public? Maybe to do with licensing?
  12. I get your point, it’s really good for the sim but I’ve never seen multiple devs/aircraft as competition, there isn’t a limit on how many aircraft you can have, the more aircraft variety we have, the better
  13. This doesn’t really need discussing imo, and I’m sure will be shut down by the admins, but I wouldn’t call them competitors, they’re different aircraft completely and different ‘depth’ levels, if anything Fenix is competing with Aerosoft’s A320 family, of which I think are not truly competitors, again due to the depth levels, therefore probably different customer bases
×
×
  • Create New...