Jump to content

KAPTEJNLN

Members
  • Posts

    1433
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by KAPTEJNLN

  1. Indeed!!! :dumb_me_s:

    Yes, it is running outside FSX but ProcessExplorer shows it as a "child" as it was run from the FSX.

    Wrote a simple test executable just allocating 3GB of memory (which proves it runs its own VAS) and run it via exe.xml.

    Here is how it looks in the Process Explorer.

    attachicon.gifVAS_Test.JPG

    Well ofcause it would run outside FSX when you lunch it like a EXE file insted of DLL file.. its the same as i have Goflight driver running as it run outside FSX (EXE file) and have 4 gb for it self

  2. well the so called program for registration of the airports has as far as i remember A section of settings dont know if that can be a clue as there you can edit stuff directly in the FSX.cfg as well as some other stuff.. so i wounder if there is something there that might beable to have a effect. now that i see you run that dll. By the way never my favor program of registration any way...

    I just wounder if there could be a conections about settings

  3. I don´t say you should say anything. I self helped this way, But whit what there has been said in here and the other tread. it´s the combination that developer try to help and some come say our system runs grate and such, it can be but something is causing the main oom. We testers and developers, Aerosoft aswell according the post. try to find a cause but quite hard as we dont experince it. in the end we can try advise and such but we can´t always tell whats on your mashine that might be a problem in the combination. But keep reducing is not the way forward as said the work is just waste of time and no fun for customers we cant do the work for the costumers we can advise.

    now the developer tryeid several things to help the users, but little luck and then I can turn it around is it the Project that is the problem even he keeps reducing? at some point it might start to help but perhaps for a limited time..

  4. I am sorry but I feel this is not fair.. we have been working so much for you, developer´s have too (them most ofcause in developing it). Some of the request´s you set, would make us wounder do you only want the airport, as it could be cut down to this only.. But whats the point then in the project..

    We have tryeid to provide data from our test that´s normaly not published, for the general public. And tryeid to make it clear what add-ons it was tested whit, but for some reason some still ask if it was tested..

    What do you wan´t developer and us to provide.. we have tryeid to help you and point in areas we know could help if some settings are set to high. we even have a tester that gave you input for Activesky next, as he was tester on that project aswell..

    The developer try to ask you for something, and a new reply came up, and then here it goes. I am sorry but we can´t help you, aslong as you don´t try what developer has to say.

    Thats the basic we can expect in order to Help.. I know the developer has been working on those updates, that errase some of his work, but you still keep sayeing do this and that, how fustrating do you self think it is.. right after release he worked at all kind of day to help thos affected and just get a door in the head.. in the end I said to him take a brake. now i have been open to share what goes on behind the public stage.

    As reminder all you say here, would you be able to say all that, face to face to the developer? As it seems like a SMS, where there is a psychological difference, as you don´t stand face to face..

    Said in another way, if you had spend lot of time in a project, and just hear remove this. All your work would be removed, and in the end how do you think the motivation would be, to create such a nice project in the future.

    We can agree that there can be problems for some users, I tryeid it myself and it is fustrating. But remember to se it from the other side.. we spend lot of time in testing to try to prevent it.. but we all know some would have problems.

    I never seen a project that diden´t need a polish in some way.

    Often it´s combinations of add-ons and such, we testers try whit what we have on our side, but you can´t expect that we have all add-ons in the world.

    • Upvote 10
  5. so you have the same result on this side of the runway ? as i could understand on the other side as there all would se it goes down hill but not on this side... but i dont think i can reproduce it whit what i have installed at the moment as i dont have FSGlobal Ultimate i have the version from 2008 but im not able to test it now... mabee i had a way you could try but it would be a good way as i cant tell what side effects you might see if any..

  6. this works on both vista and win7 if you have english version instaled of wondows. press start button type run in the search then open run enter the following: %appdata% then it opens a new folder click on microsoft -> FSX -> then you find fsx.fcg

  7. well as note i dident say it wasent posible just that the route could be shorter as vroute tels that in direct line there is around 4,782NM so it is 18% over i think i could build a route at around 5000nm by flyeing to the east insted to join the strong winds to EU. but lets stop it here this has nothing to do whit the airport..

    -edit-

    here is an alternate route i just made:

    PAFA FYU DCT POTAT M454 SINVU DCT EDURA P621 AAL M725 CDA M602 SONAL UM602 BINKA M602 CHO L996 DENKO L616 DESEN UL616 KEROP UP192 OKLOP UL617 TSL UB1 SKP UN132 KEA UL607 GENDO L607 ERITI T514 XAVIS LGIR

    around: 5014nm

  8. As note Sids and Star pro is not active at the moment as there is some work down there as i can understand:

    real world notam:

    A0197/12 - SID,STAR (RNAV) FOR RWY 22R,22L,04R AND 04L SUSPENDED.

    IAP RNAV AVBL. 25 JUN 11:03 2012 UNTIL 31 DEC 08:00 2012 ESTIMATED. CREATED:

    25 JUN 11:04 2012

  9. Nun, um Dinge zu systematischer ich diesen Beitrag geschrieben Whit aditional info.

    Für weitere Unterstützung plz besuchen FSDG Support-Forum, da es den Job easyer für den Entwickler tun würde, so müssen sie nur einmal geben Informationen ..

    Hier ist ein Link zum german Forum: http://forum.flightsimdevelopmentgroup.com/viewforum.php?f=4

    Dort begann ich in 2 posts 1 für jede Version .. (FS9, FSX)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use