-
Posts
1433 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by KAPTEJNLN
-
-
Dam I think Holgi needs more hands like a squid to keep track of all those request´s sorry I could resist...
- 2
-
Indeed!!!
Yes, it is running outside FSX but ProcessExplorer shows it as a "child" as it was run from the FSX.
Wrote a simple test executable just allocating 3GB of memory (which proves it runs its own VAS) and run it via exe.xml.
Here is how it looks in the Process Explorer.
Well ofcause it would run outside FSX when you lunch it like a EXE file insted of DLL file.. its the same as i have Goflight driver running as it run outside FSX (EXE file) and have 4 gb for it self
-
well the so called program for registration of the airports has as far as i remember A section of settings dont know if that can be a clue as there you can edit stuff directly in the FSX.cfg as well as some other stuff.. so i wounder if there is something there that might beable to have a effect. now that i see you run that dll. By the way never my favor program of registration any way...
I just wounder if there could be a conections about settings
-
I don´t say you should say anything. I self helped this way, But whit what there has been said in here and the other tread. it´s the combination that developer try to help and some come say our system runs grate and such, it can be but something is causing the main oom. We testers and developers, Aerosoft aswell according the post. try to find a cause but quite hard as we dont experince it. in the end we can try advise and such but we can´t always tell whats on your mashine that might be a problem in the combination. But keep reducing is not the way forward as said the work is just waste of time and no fun for customers we cant do the work for the costumers we can advise.
now the developer tryeid several things to help the users, but little luck and then I can turn it around is it the Project that is the problem even he keeps reducing? at some point it might start to help but perhaps for a limited time..
-
I am sorry but I feel this is not fair.. we have been working so much for you, developer´s have too (them most ofcause in developing it). Some of the request´s you set, would make us wounder do you only want the airport, as it could be cut down to this only.. But whats the point then in the project..
We have tryeid to provide data from our test that´s normaly not published, for the general public. And tryeid to make it clear what add-ons it was tested whit, but for some reason some still ask if it was tested..
What do you wan´t developer and us to provide.. we have tryeid to help you and point in areas we know could help if some settings are set to high. we even have a tester that gave you input for Activesky next, as he was tester on that project aswell..
The developer try to ask you for something, and a new reply came up, and then here it goes. I am sorry but we can´t help you, aslong as you don´t try what developer has to say.
Thats the basic we can expect in order to Help.. I know the developer has been working on those updates, that errase some of his work, but you still keep sayeing do this and that, how fustrating do you self think it is.. right after release he worked at all kind of day to help thos affected and just get a door in the head.. in the end I said to him take a brake. now i have been open to share what goes on behind the public stage.
As reminder all you say here, would you be able to say all that, face to face to the developer? As it seems like a SMS, where there is a psychological difference, as you don´t stand face to face..
Said in another way, if you had spend lot of time in a project, and just hear remove this. All your work would be removed, and in the end how do you think the motivation would be, to create such a nice project in the future.
We can agree that there can be problems for some users, I tryeid it myself and it is fustrating. But remember to se it from the other side.. we spend lot of time in testing to try to prevent it.. but we all know some would have problems.
I never seen a project that diden´t need a polish in some way.
Often it´s combinations of add-ons and such, we testers try whit what we have on our side, but you can´t expect that we have all add-ons in the world.
- 10
-
so you have the same result on this side of the runway ? as i could understand on the other side as there all would se it goes down hill but not on this side... but i dont think i can reproduce it whit what i have installed at the moment as i dont have FSGlobal Ultimate i have the version from 2008 but im not able to test it now... mabee i had a way you could try but it would be a good way as i cant tell what side effects you might see if any..
-
well you could try turn off FS Genesis mesh as i haven´t seen that before...
-
then just delt FSX.cfg as FSX would then rebuild the file when it starts again as its build to re-create a new file
-
you could try create a back up of all 3 files the active is FSX.cfg and have to be delt to create a new file the other is as it says backups...
-
this works on both vista and win7 if you have english version instaled of wondows. press start button type run in the search then open run enter the following: %appdata% then it opens a new folder click on microsoft -> FSX -> then you find fsx.fcg
-
well how should a develper remove some thing microsoft added. it is auto maticaly done as fs might read the files and place them by default. only by turn it off would prevent fs from placing them. or as Emilios told yesterday witch isent the best way to go..
-
-
Start your Engines and get ready for take off in a few Hours / minuts hehe
-
It is the same way i se it on my system...but i checked it and depending on whitch way the plane is pointing if you take parking East 10 for ga planes at some of the spots other is as you say another place in the airport
-
well as note i dident say it wasent posible just that the route could be shorter as vroute tels that in direct line there is around 4,782NM so it is 18% over i think i could build a route at around 5000nm by flyeing to the east insted to join the strong winds to EU. but lets stop it here this has nothing to do whit the airport..
-edit-
here is an alternate route i just made:
PAFA FYU DCT POTAT M454 SINVU DCT EDURA P621 AAL M725 CDA M602 SONAL UM602 BINKA M602 CHO L996 DENKO L616 DESEN UL616 KEROP UP192 OKLOP UL617 TSL UB1 SKP UN132 KEA UL607 GENDO L607 ERITI T514 XAVIS LGIR
around: 5014nm
-
lol i think that route is to long.. + you have to fly in the headwind and would cost extra fuel..
-
As note Sids and Star pro is not active at the moment as there is some work down there as i can understand:
real world notam:
A0197/12 - SID,STAR (RNAV) FOR RWY 22R,22L,04R AND 04L SUSPENDED.
IAP RNAV AVBL. 25 JUN 11:03 2012 UNTIL 31 DEC 08:00 2012 ESTIMATED. CREATED:
25 JUN 11:04 2012
-
Fairbanks X is out soon i think
-
well im quite sure that FS9 Screenshots isen´t posible at the moment as all work have been about FSX version at the moment...
-
Nun, um Dinge zu systematischer ich diesen Beitrag geschrieben Whit aditional info.
Für weitere Unterstützung plz besuchen FSDG Support-Forum, da es den Job easyer für den Entwickler tun würde, so müssen sie nur einmal geben Informationen ..
Hier ist ein Link zum german Forum: http://forum.flightsimdevelopmentgroup.com/viewforum.php?f=4
Dort begann ich in 2 posts 1 für jede Version .. (FS9, FSX)
-
Well to get things more systematic i posted this post whit aditional info.
For futher support plz visit FSDG Support forum as it would do the job easyer for the developer so they only have to give informations once..
Here is a link to the English forum: http://forum.flightsimdevelopmentgroup.com/viewforum.php?f=3
In there i started 2 posts 1 for each version..(FS9, FSX)
-
select full editor and use the attache funktion. but try disable crash detection then i think it stops..
-
This is just a guess that sounds logic i think. the codes could be used to identify if the light dosent work then its faster and easyer to have a number to refer to also that way its easyer to find
-
Just keep in mind there is many factors to take care of as some data for airports or acces is posible but other things isent and then you might not be able to start...
Repaint request
in Tweaking, repaints, SDK
Posted
eh is it just me or isen´t it here: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/files/file/2908-airbus-a319-iae-luftwaffe-1501/