[PFPX Profiles By FlyPrecisely]

Thank you, Mr. Snow. I understand your idea. Let me explain my position.

First of all, I have not only documentation (still, loads of it too though), but some data more that allows me to do the job. It's the credit to people who think the same way as I do and are interested in improvement of the atmosphere in FS.

Second. You are right. Some types are absolutely identical, but in real life some of them are as well. Renaming the headers gives users an opportunity to add the required aircraft types and specifications separately (pax and cargo), different thrust ratings on 737CL and NG families etc. But the performance data is very precise, I daresay even for real life.

Third. I don't need an insertion of my profiles into the programme. I do these profiles as a voluntary job and I am up to help all people who are interested in the improvement.

As I said earlier, I am open for any help and cooperation. That's why I share my profiles as widely as I can, so people can examine them very closely.

I am certain about my work and its results. Just because I do it so carefully as I usually do it for myself.

+1! Really appreciate your big work!

[PFPX Profiles By FlyPrecisely]

They are only in general there. Here is what I plan with them (the crossed out aircrafts are already done):

Boeing 747-400 PW4056

Boeing 747-400 CF6-80C2B1F

Boeing 747-400 RB211-524G

Boeing 747-400 RB211-524H

Boeing 747-400F PW4056

Boeing 747-400F CF6-80C2B1F

Boeing 747-400F RB211-524G

Boeing 747-400F RB211-524H

Boeing 747-400BCF PW4056

Boeing 747-400BCF CF6-80C2B1F

Boeing 747-400BCF RB211-524G

Boeing 747-400BCF RB211-524H

Boeing 747-400ER CF6-80C2B5F

Boeing 747-400ER PW4062

Boeing 747-400ERF CF6-80C2B5F

Boeing 747-400ERF PW4062

Boeing 747-400BDSF PW4056

Boeing 747-400BDSF CF6-80C2B1F

Boeing 747-400BDSF RB211-524G

Boeing 747-400BDSF RB211-524H

Boeing 747-400M PW4056

Boeing 747-400M CF6-80C2B1F

Boeing 747-400M RB211-524G

Boeing 747-400M RB211-524H

Really good job!

[All outstanding issues: Mega Airport Amsterdam X]

Recently the new GA terminal opened at Schiphol Oost. It would be nice to see this reflected in the scenery as well.

http://www.airliners.net/photo//1950983/L/&sid=99cfc3530ca15b0ae100161384059867

[Mega Airport Schiphol: Initial Release Issues.]

Hello Everybody,

First of all I want to say that is still a pity that there are still some issues at Amsterdam. I thought maybe I can get a look at the real aiport EHAM, I was there 10 weeks internship

I've saw many things in & around EHAM. So I've something to show you what I saw at Amsterdam Schiphol in real life and what I had compared with the Mega airport scenery.

this I really something about my opinion. I just wan't to help the aerosoft team and maybe they can do something about it.

Runway 18L-36R doesn't have touch Lines on therunway 18L side.

This is because runway18L is not a landing runway, only in a case of emergency they'll use it from the north.

This going about gate D2 & D3, When you approaching those gates for stand, the uses 2 guidelines. For example at D2, onthe ground assigns D2AB, that means that you can follow line A,or B. guideline A is the line for al the small-medium aircraft. Like B737-700/800/900A319/A320. The B line shows a wide curve. The B767-200/300 B757-200/300 &A321 will use the B guideline.

On the ground you Will see D2A/B and when the line spreads you'll see Line D2B and D2A. for D3 it's the same. At E3 you have it in the scenery as well. only D2 & D3 doesn't have 2 lines.

About the Taxiways at EHAM,

It's hardly to say, but some of the placed taxiway designators are still incorrect.

At home I've a document that shows me all the taxiway designators even the coordinates that you can simply convert to the Aerosoft EHAM, but I'll comeback on that later on.

w'll be coninuted...

Again! This is really not the complain about thisscenery, because Amsterdam Schiphol is still a beauty.

It's a pity that this scenery still missingsome issues. I'm not talking about the FPS, because we already know that issueoff course.

The only thing I mean to say is that I hope that Aerosoft can take a look at those issues. We can't only complain about the issues. In my opinoin the best thing we can do is help them out a bit like this.

I wish you all a goodday!

grtz

Tiago